I thought the question itself was answered fully by the second post. The third was really awesome though, by adding "why the question gets asked" in the first place.
The premise is "underpowering a speaker CAN (or can't) blow a speaker", not "underpowering a speaker WILL blow a speaker."
Post #2 uses facts to show the latter is incorrect (which it obviously is). Post #3 addresses the former which is a much different statement.