I've seen quite a few computer motherboards with bulging or leaking electrolytics, but I'd agree they were likely lower quality.If they were the actual problem, it was because of either really poor caps or really poor design.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I've seen quite a few computer motherboards with bulging or leaking electrolytics, but I'd agree they were likely lower quality.If they were the actual problem, it was because of either really poor caps or really poor design.
The capacitors might have failed prematurely, but it’s equally likely that your friends tried to run the pedals at a higher voltage, or accidentally plugged a power supply into the pedal that supplied AC instead of DC.I've fixed quite a few old pedals of my friends and in most cases the electrolytic caps were the culprit
I have been accused of being ignorant, a dummy, and a moron
Not specifically.Interesting info here, are there components that commonly fail while simply sitting in storage unplugged? I put a class d head away in a closet in my house that was functioning, then maybe 6-7 years later I pulled it out and it's just putting out a sort of electrical pulsing noise and I was afraid it was going to blow my cab so I shut it off right away. Even the power light was pulsing. I imagine that's not much to go on but any ideas?
I keep hearing the "all electrolytic capacitors" go bad preaching, the pundits stating that this varies from 10 years to 30 years yet in my experience on quality products 50+ years is a fairly easy metric to achieve. I have been accused of being ignorant, a dummy, and a moron because I don't agree with the mythology of old wive's tales.
I have provided some example calculations taking the data right off of capacitor data sheets and have arrived at calculated lifespans well in excess of 50 years, but these numbers simply aren't understood by the superstitious among us.
Here's the reliability numbers for a small power supply I was looking at, the mean time before failure is 3 million hours. There are several electrolytic caps in this power supply and 3 million hours is well beyond 200 years of continuous operation.
In general, probably 95% of all electrolytic caps replaced are perfectly good and will continue to be good for decades.
View attachment 5326378
Like anything, a cap can go bad in a day or 50 years. But changing them as a matter of routine is silly. Apparently you didn’t, so not pointing fingers at you. But for those who do change them after a certain amount of time whether they’ve gone bad or not, hey, spend your money foolishly if you want.And yet on many things i have to repair (not only audio) there is caps loosing their values or leaking.
For example, I repaired a Koch amp which had a bad set of caps resulting in wind noise in the speaker.
Or my actual Daikin AC/heater is failing when it's too cold outside because of bad MKP caps degrading the comm between out unit and in unit.
Life span? 4 years.
I'm not saying it's always the capacitors but i always check them quickly.
My check routine is in this order:
Isolation/ground
Connectors / cables
relays
capacitors
... and the rest.
I'm not saying it's always the capacitors but i always check them quickly.
My check routine is in this order:
Isolation/ground
Connectors / cables
relays
capacitors
... and the rest.
This question kinda reminds me of the discussion about necks not being under tension (Warmoth necks are made and shipped with no tension on them, and it doesn't seem to hurt them). Is there any functional difference between a new capacitor that has been sitting on a shelf for years before being installed on anything, and that same capacitor being in a piece of gear that hasn't been powered up for years?what about the idea of long-unused equipment maybe being more prone to the caps going bad once it is fired up again?
What really "stresses" caps (note the quotation marks) is power cycling. Not saying this to discount whatever you said, hey?Heat management, as well as ripple current management and proper design/derating techniques go a long way to minimize these issues.
Yes, choosing a quality manufacturer that doesn't play games is part of the design process. Understanding the parameters surrounding the parts is a big part of this. Not sourcing the lowest bid, shady off shore vendors is another part. Then, there's designing the part so that you know exactly how it's going to behave in that application. (I had some Sony CRT CAD monitors that were on 24/7 for about 10 years, never had any issues with them other than the white plastic housing yellowing some.
Actually, for products that conform to any of the mil specs have to show test data and calculations. They can't pull these numbers out of their rear ends because the penalties are generally a disqualification as a supplier for a significant period of time. This power supply is a qualified assembly, so I expect the numbers to be a reasonably accurate predictor.
As a data point, I have a test amp in the shop that has been running for 14 years non-stop, that's ~125k hours on the original caps and the amp is perfectly fine. This test amp is to validate MY aging calculations where I intend for ~50k minimum lifespan on caps, I expect the test to end up somewhere around 200k hours or 4 times my target goal. That gives me good confidence that my math model is conservative.
If they were the actual problem, it was because of either really poor caps or really poor design.
Heat management, as well as ripple current management and proper design/derating techniques go a long way to minimize these issues.
Yes, choosing a quality manufacturer that doesn't play games is part of the design process. Understanding the parameters surrounding the parts is a big part of this. Not sourcing the lowest bid, shady off shore vendors is another part. Then, there's designing the part so that you know exactly how it's going to behave in that application. (I had some Sony CRT CAD monitors that were on 24/7 for about 10 years, never had any issues with them other than the white plastic housing yellowing some.
Actually, for products that conform to any of the mil specs have to show test data and calculations. They can't pull these numbers out of their rear ends because the penalties are generally a disqualification as a supplier for a significant period of time. This power supply is a qualified assembly, so I expect the numbers to be a reasonably accurate predictor.
As a data point, I have a test amp in the shop that has been running for 14 years non-stop, that's ~125k hours on the original caps and the amp is perfectly fine. This test amp is to validate MY aging calculations where I intend for ~50k minimum lifespan on caps, I expect the test to end up somewhere around 200k hours or 4 times my target goal. That gives me good confidence that my math model is conservative.
I am no expert by any means, but I've fixed quite a few old pedals of my friends and in most cases the electrolytic caps were the culprit. I'd take anything you say seriously though!
If they were the actual problem, it was because of either really poor caps or really poor design.