• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Caring for a Maple/Maple EBMM Neck

What is the best procedure to maintain the maple/maple neck on my 2001 Ernie Ball Music Man Stingray 5H (other than wiping it down)? Is it a gloss or satin finish? Is sanding and applying Tru Oil really necessary? Are there any products/steps to specifically avoid? The EBMM FAQ is a bit confusing so I thought I would post here.
 
images.jpeg


Sorry for the horrible picture, but you can see the line just below the headstock where the finish on the back of the neck changes from poly on the headstock to oil on the neck. Yes, it is oil, just follow the instructions on the EBMM website and you should be good.
 
Well, that line in the finish is the transition between the two. That line, AFAIK, is not on any MM basses without an oil neck.
This still doesn't tell me how to tell which type of neck I have on this particular bass.
Again, from the Ernie Ball FAQ:

CATEGORY #1: GLOSSY OR MATTE POLYESTER FINISH
Ernie Ball FAQs said:
Some of our instruments have necks that are finished with a glossy or matte polyester finish.

CATEGORY #2: TRU-OIL & GUNSTOCK WAX
Ernie Ball FAQs said:
Many of our necks are not finished that way. They are finished with tru-oil and gunstock wax

So my question is how do I tell which of these two categories does my particular bass belong? Because until I answer that question, I cannot follow the directions because the directions are different for each of the two categories.
 
This still doesn't tell me how to tell which type of neck I have on this particular bass.
Again, from the Ernie Ball FAQ:

CATEGORY #1: GLOSSY OR MATTE POLYESTER FINISH


CATEGORY #2: TRU-OIL & GUNSTOCK WAX


So my question is how do I tell which of these two categories does my particular bass belong? Because until I answer that question, I cannot follow the directions because the directions are different for each of the two categories.

Do you have the line below your headstock? If you do, it is oil. If you don't, it is poly and you should be able to tell the difference between matte and gloss.
 
Attached is an image of the reverse of the neck where it meets the headstock. It sure looks like there could be a dividing line between one region and the other (suggesting it's an oil finish) but it is hard to tell for sure because I don't have a polyester neck to which I can compare it.

N.B., The red arrows show where I think the finish changes.
 

Attachments

  • headstock_reverse_joint_detail.jpg
    headstock_reverse_joint_detail.jpg
    293.4 KB · Views: 48
Last edited:
Attached is an image of the reverse of the neck where it meets the headstock. It sure looks like there could be a dividing line between one region and the other (suggesting it's an oil finish) but it is hard to tell for sure because I don't have a polyester neck to which I can compare it.

N.B., The red arrows show where I think the finish changes.

You don't need a neck to compare it to. You should be able to feel the difference between the two areas. Regardless, you have an oil neck, follow the MM instructions for them.
 
Ya, didn't say that before...I thought it, just didn't say it. How do I know, this one I did say before, AFAIK, the only necks that have that line between the neck and the headstock are oiled necks.
It's perfectly valid to point out that the difference between the finish on the shaft and the finish on the headstock can be felt in the tactile sense; however, until you mentioned that I was relying solely on visual data. And when I said that I don't have the poly neck to compare it to and you disputed that idea by talking about texture/feel, that's not really fair because you only now introduced that idea into the discussion. Do you see my thought process here?

So in your opinion, my neck is an oiled neck? I am leaning in that direction also.
 
Last edited:
It's an oil/wax neck for sure. I think the most pertinent fact is the model and year of manufacture - since the mid-90s the oil/wax neck finish has been standard on 'regular' Stingrays. You'd only have a poly finished neck on a Stingray Classic (which wasn't made then) or on one of the cheaper lines like the SUB (which I don't think was made then) or the SBMM instruments (which definitely weren't made then). Hope that helps.
 
  • Like
Reactions: selowitch