TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Whew, its nice to come back to a thread where people like Carvins
Still digging my new fretless SB5001. I put some DR Fatbeams on it and it really brought the mwah out.
I might try some Sunbeams next, but happy with them right now.
, i'll pay shipping and all...how much for it?I do, and while there is a noticeable gain drop when I go to passive mode, I don't think that's because it's VB vs VV. I have other basses that have passive bypass and they do it too (to varying degrees depending on specific pickups/preamps of course).Does anyone have an SB 5000 with the Volume and Pickup blend option, as opposed to the separate volume controls for bridge and neck pickups? I ordered my 5000 this way, and it seems much less powerful in passive mode than my SB 4000 that has the separate volume controls. Carvin tells me to call back on Monday to speak with a tech - maybe there's an adjustment on the pot? My SB 5000 is also chambered, versus my solid body 4000 - but I'm talking output, not resonance - so not sure if anyone has experienced a similar condition and whether it is fixable. Thanks.
PMd.Hey Vic,
ship to Canada?, i'll pay shipping and all...how much for it?
mine will be with black pickguard, and wouldnt mind a bit of change once in a while..lol
I do, and while there is a noticeable gain drop when I go to passive mode, I don't think that's because it's VB vs VV. I have other basses that have passive bypass and they do it too (to varying degrees depending on specific pickups/preamps of course).
Doubtful IMHO, barring some kind of actual problem with your particular bass anyway.Agreed - but where my SB 4000 has the V/V, and is much more powerful in passive mode than compared to my SB 5000 in passive mode (with the V/B) - I was wondering if the pickup blend option may be the culprit, when comparing apples-to-apples. Thanks.
That's a long time to hold a grudge IMHO.Ok, so I had a bad experience with Carvin customer service back in the 90s and swore I would never do business with them. This bass may have changed my mind. I am a jazz player and was trying to find a fretless that would be comparable to my MIA jazz. This just might be it....
My SB5001 weighs 8.5lbs. What's the scoop on those strings?curious about chambered, how much does it weight?
something to consider are the F bass strings..or supersteps..
cheers
I'm curious to see how this turns out. I was always told by the Carvin folks that the VB didn't quite have as much output/punch as the VV, which is why I stuck with the VV.I don't think that's because it's VB vs VV.
I'm curious to see how this turns out. I was always told by the Carvin folks that the VB didn't quite have as much output/punch as the VV, which is why I stuck with the VV.
I may actually take back my comment a little... DEPENDING on how dramatic the difference he's talking about (which sounded a lot more significant than I'd expect)...On the V/V and V/B debate, V/B does indeed lose something in passive mode that it doesn't in active, IMO.
That's a long time to hold a grudge IMHO.
Can't win with some people. I would put my SB against any passive 4 banger in any price range. I'll take the Pesi challenge any day of the week. If I find a bass better, cool. I don't think I will though. I played every bass I could get my hands on when I started having back issues. I even tried out one of the less than attractive beatle basses (tone wasn't me). After all but giving up on finding a Sub $2000 bass that weighed under 8lbs, I was ready to go for a Lull. I was starting to save up and then Carvin offered chambered w/o the fancy top and I bit hard. Glad I did too. Saved me some cash in the process and helped me find my #1.
Do I GAS for other stuff, sure. But, it is going to take one heck of an instrument to unseat my SB (if that is possible).
My SB5001 weighs 8.5lbs. What's the scoop on those strings?
I'm curious to see how this turns out. I was always told by the Carvin folks that the VB didn't quite have as much output/punch as the VV, which is why I stuck with the VV.