TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Eh, to each their own. Reading is both over and underrated. Its always worth it to learn stuff, learning is never not good. At the same time not learning to read is not harmful to your playing, career, or potential as a player.
I can read, but play in no situations where I need it, so while if I need it I have it, I'm also a totally functioning musician without it
@Dr. Cheese when you say reading do you mean written out bass clef note by note? or do you just mean written out chords?
Reading music is how I taught myself to play bass but unfortunately, my lazy side has taken over and I have let my reading skills slip away.
He was an idiot. Probably couldn't do it himself.That is sort of how I started too. I was decent in the first position, but my first teacher told me reading was not important for bass.
How functioning would you be if you didn't ever learn it, though? Even when I don't read, I'm using the knowledge I gained from it every single day. But I also read and I pick up those gigs, too!Eh, to each their own. Reading is both over and underrated. Its always worth it to learn stuff, learning is never not good. At the same time not learning to read is not harmful to your playing, career, or potential as a player.
I can read, but play in no situations where I need it, so while if I need it I have it, I'm also a totally functioning musician without it
It's not that rare. Yes, you will find those stereotypes out there, but in my experiences, most readers I know are a good deal better at using their ears than un-schooled musicians and have more sophisticated options than them, and those who can read but can't improvise or play by ear are more common simply because skilled musicians are less common than unskilled in general, and at least through reading these folks were able to land some work playing, whereas if they didn't read, they'd have long given it up like most people who never learn the nuts and bolts of music making.I know expert sight-readers, who have no idea how to play by ear or improvise; I know expert ear players, who can't read any notation.
There is a market for both types of players, but rarely the same market.
Then there is the rare individual who learns both skills from an early age, and has mastered both. This individual is equally at home in either setting. He/she can nail the union reading gigs, and the rock band/jazz gigs; is very versatile in the studio, because they can read the arranger's chart and come up with their own lines by ear; they are genre proof--they can do classical, jazz and all the notated styles, plus pick up other styles by listening to the repertoire.
True story. A guy from high school was a guitar monster. He could listen to anything and play it better. He went to ATL to get into the studio business. His interview consisted of the guy handing him some sheet music and asking him to play it, he couldn't read. They thanked him for showing up and sent him back to south Alabama. Guy had monster monster chops, but couldn't read music.
Make of it what you will.
He came home and joined a really good little band and did well with that.He probably could have gotten some work if he had networked and local studio guys vouched for him. Still, being a non-reader would have limited his work.
Those guys probably wouldn't have had very good careers either if they had listened to someone like you.