• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Class D amps sound inferior?

I might not be expressing that well. If you have a synthesizer set to produce square wave output and you press the middle C key, it will produce a distinct square wave at 440 Hz. It's not arbitrary.
Middle C is 512 Hz.
However, that key will also produce a sine @ 512Hz, or a sawtooth, or whatever other waveform you have your filters set up for.
 
I might not be expressing that well. If you have a synthesizer set to produce square wave output and you press the middle C key, it will produce a distinct square wave at 440 Hz. It's not arbitrary.

Ah yes - middle C fundamental at 440hz - I would call that an "A" but then I'm only being pedantic :)
As long as it's not 443hz I'm OK with it :)
 
Greetings Everyone,
I was watching a video the other day talking/explaining amp Classes. Pretty much all of the same with Class A, B and AB amps both tube and solid state. But one thing mentioned about Class D was something I had never heard before. The statement was that, and I am paraphrasing, Class D amps are digital and their output signal is also digital which makes for an inferior sound quality.
Is this true?
Doesn't Class D amps convert back to analog?
Or is the conversion where the sound quality fails?

I have a Fender Rumble 800 and never thought the sound was anything but very good.
This statement that I heard will not sway me from my amp as there are many benefits to it that like a lot.

I would like to hear from anyone and their thoughts, opinions or maybe technical knowledge on this topic

Thanks
Depends on what you call inferior. Consistent til digital distortion/clipping failure occurs...yeah, I'd call that inferior to a point. Massive clean power output...no, I'd say that's superior to a point. Oddly transparent tone output...ehh, that could go either way. Size and weight...no one could make that sound bad.
 
I remember those... they called the power amp "Digital Energy Conversion Amplifiers" .... heheh...
They were actually pretty good. I don't remember anyone really complaining about the sound. The speaker was decent and they had good clarity. But I think they were heavy as hell and I think the knobs used to come off very easily.
I played in a band that had 2 of those PV digital amps on a 4 way system. The PV's were on the high mid and horns. We thought they sounded OK until the horn amp went down and we replaced it with an old Phase Linear 400. The difference was night and day. The Phase was much cleaner. Todays modern Class D amps sound every bit as clean and full as the QSC-Plx's RMX's and older USA's I used before Class D came around.
 
  • Like
Reactions: frankie5string
I was a “if it doesn’t have tubes and weigh 40 lbs it ain’t good” guy.....
then I bought a Mesa D800. just my humble opinion, but a quality class D is lacking nothing in my book.
this little amp embarrasses anything else I have owned. It makes my SVT3 pro look like a practice amp. Nothing but love for them. Plus, you can carry it under your arm. Lol
 
I mean, there might be a difference, but I've never noticed it and for sure the audience has never noticed it (and really doesn't care) so, like, whatever. I'll keep tossing my 5lb Mesa Subway D-800 head into my carry-on and travelling without a second thought. I've played countless shows all around Europe with it and it's never let me down, so certainly can't see the point of dragging a 30lb head around when this one does the job just fine.