• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Classic VS Modern

Classic VS Modern

  • Classic look and classic tone

    Votes: 40 28.0%
  • Modern look and modern tone

    Votes: 24 16.8%
  • Classic look and modern tone

    Votes: 20 14.0%
  • Modern look and classic tone

    Votes: 8 5.6%
  • A bit of both

    Votes: 36 25.2%
  • Could care less just play what's there

    Votes: 15 10.5%

  • Total voters
    143
Seems like I have gone through a couple phases. I tried a '76 RIC, '76 Ripper, '77 Guild, '79 Fender P. Decided I liked more modern tones and went with Lakland, EBMM, Warwick, and active G&Ls. Now back to passive with 2 Nash Js (Lollar), G&L SB-2 and L1K. Quite happy where I'm at now.
 
Sometimes an active bass seems to be easier to get the tone you want, especially at festivals with backlines. A basic P-bass is probably what I'd use if i only used one bass. I'm with atomicdog on the Bad Ass II, but my P-basses are string through and I think that accomplishes about the same thing. It gives you more sustain and the ability to get a more aggresive sound.
 
I like both classic and modern looks and sounds. Besides my Fender Jazz I also like different looking basses. Like Alvaro, I have a Gene SImmons Axe. Had owned a BC RIch Warlock and Virgen basses in the past. Just depends on what I am going for at the time :) To each his/her own though :)
 
what is a bright, clangy, trebly tone like Entwistle's live tone considered? I sort of have that. I have a dual output/dual amp/cab setup, so I have tons of lows and mids/highs....sounds pretty hi-fi to me, but it's all passive pickups in my bass.....

This.


The sound I have is bright, clangy, and aggressive. But it's not something I'd call "modern."

Why do we keep pretending that all modern tones are the same and all "classic" or "vintage" tones are they same when they so plainly are not?


Also, to the OP... it's "couldn't care less." Not could care less." Sorry, bit of a pet peeve of mine.