Oh shoot, I dunno: that was long ago.
Fred told me to measure the pole pieces, I did, and he sent me the pup.
If the old pickup is in the DS box, maybe that says...I can check, if I remember![]()
is there any way you could do a quick measurement?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Oh shoot, I dunno: that was long ago.
Fred told me to measure the pole pieces, I did, and he sent me the pup.
If the old pickup is in the DS box, maybe that says...I can check, if I remember![]()
No, they're single coils but in a humbucker cover.These new pickups are humbuckers whereas the original DS and Hangstroms are single coil... How will that affect the tone?
"musta been a reason"
Maybe so, maybe not.
Saab. Volvo.
This is not a criticism of those cars, just that sometimes people do things differently "just because"
Different means to a similar end.
These new pickups are humbuckers whereas the original DS and Hangstroms are single coil... How will that affect the tone?
"humbucker"
Some uninformed folks might look at the DS and not realize that what looks like a second set of poles are in reality the adjusters...
Je ne sais pas monsieur!the new pickups are single! just like were the original , where do you see them humbuckers?
Well the reason I'm curious is because the BiSonic was a production pickup and generally production means keeping the price down. Threaded steel poles would have meant less parts and less time in assembly - if it didn't make any difference to the sound then why go the extra expense? Either it was done to set the BiSonics aside from the equivalent Fender and Gibson pickups or it was done because the un-threaded iron pole pieces added something to the sound compared to threaded steel."musta been a reason"
Maybe so, maybe not.
Saab. Volvo.
This is not a criticism of those cars, just that sometimes people do things differently "just because"
Different means to a similar end.
Well the reason I'm curious is because the BiSonic was a production pickup and generally production means keeping the price down. Threaded steel poles would have meant less parts and less time in assembly - if it didn't make any difference to the sound then why go the extra expense? Either it was done to set the BiSonics aside from the equivalent Fender and Gibson pickups or it was done because the un-threaded iron pole pieces added something to the sound compared to threaded steel.
Henry (owned one Volvo but never driven a Saab)
Sure.
Bug me if I don't get to it sometime soon.
I won't be home for a while yet, and I get forgetful sometimes.
Went for $349 on a BIN.
I love my DS bass and have been considering snagging another pickup as a foundation for reconstruction should tragedy ever strike.
Lately, for not too much more one can be had that has a bass attached to it......
Went for $349 on a BIN.
I love my DS bass and have been considering snagging another pickup as a foundation for reconstruction should tragedy ever strike.
Lately, for not too much more one can be had that has a bass attached to it......
yeah... I was going to pull the trigger on it yesterday, but... it wasn't going to work for me I need the smaller pole spacing for my Tele bass project
Here is what I don't understand... There is a huge demand for these pickups, I don't why Fred just doesn't sell the rights and plans to somebody who want's to produce them
![]()
The bigger mystery is why the bridge bisonic has a higher chrome frame than the neck bisonic. Two different chrome frames certainly meant higher costs for several obvious reasons, but at least I cannot understand what it would add soundwise or in terms of quality.:
