• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Club Dark Star

These new pickups are humbuckers whereas the original DS and Hangstroms are single coil... How will that affect the tone?
No, they're single coils but in a humbucker cover.

On that subject, there must have been a reason Hagstrom designed the pickups with seperate adjusters for the pole pieces. It near enough doubled the number of parts compared to single coils with threaded poles.
 
"musta been a reason"

Maybe so, maybe not.
Saab. Volvo.

This is not a criticism of those cars, just that sometimes people do things differently "just because"
Different means to a similar end.
 
"musta been a reason"

Maybe so, maybe not.
Saab. Volvo.

This is not a criticism of those cars, just that sometimes people do things differently "just because"
Different means to a similar end.

Well, it might just be the reason was a desire to deliver good quality to bass players who wanted all strings to have an equal output. Might be part of the reason why Guild, as well as Jack and Phil and Alembic, chose bisonics. You don't go through the trouble of making adjustable poles "just because". Just like SAAB was not first to introduce seat belts as standard in 1958 "just because". That was a means to a specific end - they wanted their customers to go through a car crash alive and well. Hagström wanted their customers to have their notes go through on all strings alive and well, so to speak. Anyways, Gibson already did adjustable poles in those days. What they did not do was a wide frequency pickup. If there were ever any need for adjustable poles, it would be on wide frequency pickups. I know I need to adjust the poles on both my DS and my bisonics.

Seriously, neither Saab, Volvo nor H&M, Ikea, Ingmar Bergman, ABBA nor the Nobel Prize got anything to do with Hagström bisonics. Just like neither GM, McDonald's nor Haliburton have anything to do with Darkstar pickups. And that is not a criticism of DarkStar pickups ;)
 
"humbucker"

Some uninformed folks might look at the DS and not realize that what looks like a second set of poles are in reality the adjusters...

That's certainly true. I have seen plenty of knowledgeable people who have thought DS are humbuckers. But humbuckers would never have the wide range that DS and bisonics have, and that's really what makes them so special (and good). As you might know, the chi-sonics come both as single coils and humbuckers. They sound different enough to earn different names.
 
"musta been a reason"

Maybe so, maybe not.
Saab. Volvo.

This is not a criticism of those cars, just that sometimes people do things differently "just because"
Different means to a similar end.
Well the reason I'm curious is because the BiSonic was a production pickup and generally production means keeping the price down. Threaded steel poles would have meant less parts and less time in assembly - if it didn't make any difference to the sound then why go the extra expense? Either it was done to set the BiSonics aside from the equivalent Fender and Gibson pickups or it was done because the un-threaded iron pole pieces added something to the sound compared to threaded steel.
Henry (owned one Volvo but never driven a Saab)
 
Well the reason I'm curious is because the BiSonic was a production pickup and generally production means keeping the price down. Threaded steel poles would have meant less parts and less time in assembly - if it didn't make any difference to the sound then why go the extra expense? Either it was done to set the BiSonics aside from the equivalent Fender and Gibson pickups or it was done because the un-threaded iron pole pieces added something to the sound compared to threaded steel.
Henry (owned one Volvo but never driven a Saab)

The bigger mystery is why the bridge bisonic has a higher chrome frame than the neck bisonic. Two different chrome frames certainly meant higher costs for several obvious reasons, but at least I cannot understand what it would add soundwise or in terms of quality.

Btw, Volvo is an American company (owned by Ford since 1999) and the Dutch owner of Saab filed for bankruptcy last week.:eek:
 
I read, with great sadness, about Saab going bankrupt.
I had two 900sTurbo; and they were super great, super fun cars.
Readily held my upright, amp and everything, got to 90mph very quickly, and got great fuel economy.
Even came with a very nice stereo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rufus.K
As an eBay Associate, TalkBass may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.
Went for $349 on a BIN.

I love my DS bass and have been considering snagging another pickup as a foundation for reconstruction should tragedy ever strike.

Lately, for not too much more one can be had that has a bass attached to it......

yeah... I was going to pull the trigger on it yesterday, but... it wasn't going to work for me I need the smaller pole spacing for my Tele bass project
 
Here is what I don't understand... There is a huge demand for these pickups, I don't why Fred just doesn't sell the rights and plans to somebody who want's to produce them
:confused:

I would be surprised if he would have any rights to sell. Any rights to these pickups would be Hagström's, wouldn't it? But I don't think they have any legal rights either. It is basically just a big p90.

The reason why nobody has made them (yet) apart from Fred is probably because it is very costly to make the chrome frame and the bobbin. Perhaps Fred has run out of those and is reluctant to order a new stock from his producers. They probably needs to be ordered ny the thousands. And/or perhaps he is reluctant to buy a new stock because he is redesigning the bobbin to make a dummie coil for hum cancellation, or for 5-strings, or something else.
 
The bigger mystery is why the bridge bisonic has a higher chrome frame than the neck bisonic. Two different chrome frames certainly meant higher costs for several obvious reasons, but at least I cannot understand what it would add soundwise or in terms of quality.:

Because basses like the Starfire had an angle to their set neck, meaning the strings are closer to the body (and the pickup) at the neck than they are at the bridge. It's the same reason Les Pauls with carved tops have a higher bridge pickup surround. Maybe Hagstrom got a good deal on having two stamping tools made, a kind of Buy One Get One Free :smug: