TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Good read and great information! Thanks! Question though. If you use pickups such as EMG that do not require a bridge ground, is it bad to use the "other" string companies?
I for one say leave the Elixir's alone. Been using them for years with no problems. I don't want warning labels on them either.
As if the warning labels - for those that could benefit from them - would suddenly change how the strings perform on YOUR particular instrument.
I assume you toss the package they came in after installation, or better yet - do not stare at them on a daily basis?
If you use Elixer's with success - awesome.
Some may not and Roger has the reason why, so people should actually be able to make an informed choice.
This country is warning labeled to death. If I buy a pair of shoes that I don't like because they hurt my feet does that mean the manufacturer should put a warning label on them? Who do you think pays for that warning label? The consumer does. Maybe the guy that doesn't know should do a little research before he buys. That has worked for me for nearly 50 years.
This is ridiculous. I have not noted any significant difference in hum with coated or tapewound strings.
In addition, the buyer is supposed to know what they are buying. Perhaps UN-coated string should have a warning of electrocution if used in an improperly grounded venue.
Warning labels have sunk to the level of the lowest mentalities. You can even find a jar of peanuts that has a label that says "caution - contains peanuts" ! (true)
Bassamatic said:This is ridiculous. I have not noted any significant difference in hum with coated or tapewound strings.

