• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join free Log in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Compressor - rackmount or pedal?

#3
It really depends on your needs and your setup. There are some excellent pedal compressors out there. The Demeter Compulator is a good example of a musical and useful optical compressor in a stompbox enclosure. There are some others that have more complete adjustments too. Rack compressors also run the gamut in quality and sonics.

What do you want the compressor to do? Are you looking for it as an effect, or to control the signal level hitting the input of an amp?
 
#7
fokof said:
IMHO
There are a lot more choices of very good sounding units on the rackmount side.
Click to expand...

I beg to differ. I think there are plenty of excellent (and crappy) sounding options in either configuration.

As for recommendation, it all depends on your needs. If you're using it as an effect and turning it on and off frequently, a pedal would probably be more convenient. If it's a leave-on processor for your sound, and you have a rack-mount rig, a rack unit might be a better call.

When I had a rack-mounted rig, I used a dbx 160A that I liked a lot. Currently, I'm running a Demeter Compulator that I'm also very fond of.
 
#8
~Generally speaking~ With rack units you are more likely to have greater control over the compression parameters, while with pedals they will have optimized its performance for guitar/bass-type one-channel signals and provided only the controls that are absolutely necessary.

I find that higher voltage or higher current power supplies tend to be a sign of a circuit with less noise and distortion than circuits designed to run off a 9V battery. So (again, in general) I see more rack units with low noise and low distortion compared to pedals. But there are lots of exceptions to this observation, it's only maybe 60% or 70% accurate.

Another factor is that there are companies producing rock-solid pro gear and cheap consumer/beginner crud in both formats. So it's good to do your homework on any specific model you have your eye on.

My personal favorites are rackmount, but then I'm a tweaker. For most bassists a good-quality pedal is a more sensible and practical choice.
 
#9
Honestly, the best compressor is called the FMR RNC. Its like $175 I used to own a couple when I needed compression for recording, they are absolutely silent...so silent you think they are broken, but its really just invisible compression with no artifacts. People compare it to $1,000 compressors. Its not rack mount or pedal, but its as big as a pedal. Look into it or PM me to discuss, they are really worth the cash. If you do audiop mastering, I wouldn't use anything buy an RNC because you want a quiet compressor for that. I Heart FMR, the guy who started the company knows his **** and isn't in the business for the money.
 
#10
Seems to me rack units would be great for studio use with stereo signals etc but pedals would be more appropriate for use as an effect for a bass rig. I certainly don't want compression on every tune I play, sometimes I want it on the chorus but not the verse, for instance, so I'd rather have a pedal.
 
#13
Krispy, a word of advice. If you want someone to take your suggestions seriously, you should qualify them. Something like "I've tried several different rack and pedal compressors, including X, Y, and Z models, and the Digitech was better than them in this way and that way for the style I was playing".

Saying "just get it" honestly makes it sound like you "just got it" for Xmas and it's your first compressor.
 
#15
EricF said:
I beg to differ. I think there are plenty of excellent (and crappy) sounding options in either configuration.

As for recommendation, it all depends on your needs. If you're using it as an effect and turning it on and off frequently, a pedal would probably be more convenient. If it's a leave-on processor for your sound, and you have a rack-mount rig, a rack unit might be a better call.

When I had a rack-mounted rig, I used a dbx 160A that I liked a lot. Currently, I'm running a Demeter Compulator that I'm also very fond of.
Click to expand...

i agree. i was going to get a demeter next or a multicomp but what i want in a comp is an "always on" i figured i could get more out of a rack comp for less money and it wont take up space on my pedal board. with that said.. i just picked up a dbx 166a that should be here at the end of the week :)
 
#16
EricF said:
I beg to differ. I think there are plenty of excellent (and crappy) sounding options in either configuration.
Click to expand...

Of course , and that's true for everything.

The best sound comp I've ever used for bass is the LA-3A ( closely followed by the LA-2A ) I haven't tried every "stomp comp" in the world, but my guess is that there is no pedal that would sound as good as those. Or a Distressor , or a BSS DPR901 etc.....

So , IMHO there are more good sounding comp in the rackmount world. And I'm not talking Behringer or Alesis here.....:p

The OP asked about pros/cons.
A "pro" for rack comp would be best sounding units
A "con" for rack comp would be those are not cheap
 
#19
Does anyone have anything to say about the EHX Black Finger? It looks interesting to me, but I don't know much about compressors as I've never really used one. I would like something to beef up my tone a little bit, though, and maybe help get a tighter sound with my fuzz and synth effects.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom
Back