• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Confessions of a Flatwound convert...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Who said it wasn't about the music? I tend to like using gear to play music on. Without it, it's rather quiet. ;)

Well after p-bass started bashing on the flats, he pulled teh sneaky and punched in a line about not understanding why there was all this static since it is all about fun. Flip-flops are for the beach, not the internet; the internet is cereal bidnezz.
 
fireworks.jpg


Nice entertainment folks.:D
 
There is a status issue. Who here plays for fun, and who plays with pros? Play bass. Let your cred speak for itself- it won't speak via typing stuff in a forum though.

Insecurity on display is always unattractive... and boring. It's cool, just get over it, bro! :cool:

The flats discussion is interesting. A fine thread, with the expected derailments (it's Talkbass)! Anyway I dig my Chromes on the Smith Burner. Still have D'Addario Nickel-Wounds on the Squier, 'cause it sounds stupid-huge and gnarly.

Different basses, there you go.
 
Hey Monster,
I've had...
Fender Stainless Flats: I found them to be high-tension, neck-snapping cables.

Rotosound 77s: Nice, very mid-rangey though, I thought.

D-Addario Half-Rounds: I used these on a DiMarzio Model-One-equipped Gibson EB-0 bass, worked very well. Gave some lower-mid growl and definition to an otherwise pretty dark and murky-sounding bass.

GHS Brite Flats: IIRC, snappy but thick. Beefy with some brightness there. Not as vibrant as the Chromes though.

Seeing they were all on different basses, it's hard to give a grade of any significant kind to each.
I liked the effect of the Half-Rounds on the EB-0.

The GHS Brite Flats were sort of like the Half-Rounds, but the string was ground deeper- past the half-way point of the original round winding and was kinder to fingertips... it was a very hefty string, but not particularly high tension.

My least fav was the Fender Stainless Flats. They had the least to offer in tone, and were the tightest string.

I've tried the TI flats, and they are almost alarmingly low-tension! But they sound great. I understand they are punched-up in the midrange as well, but I was looking for a deeper string for the Smith. I wanted the LaBella P-Flats, but had EZ and cheep access to the Chromes. They are working.
 
Much appreciated. I'm considering Chromes and TIs to get a taste. Only issue is the break in time means it could be several months before I get a "true" feel for each string. Oh well, that is part of the fun in the quest for tone.

I'm on a Corvette $$, so I've got plenty of growl. DR Lowriders sounded great with a pick, but they were a bit rough on the fingers (SS). I like the slickery feel of flats. I'm also tending to run the trebble almost all the way down, so bright isn't what I need either. Perhaps the TI road is for me.
 
My rock band has two guitars, but the three of us rarely double one another. We make triads using octave chords (and the root for me). In this setting, that bright tone is ESSENTIAL to the mix coming together. Together, our band is a wall of sound, but if any of us stood out too much tonally, it would sound disjointed. We all have our own space within the harmony, less so within the tonal spectrum.

Anyway, I'm not disagreeing with you, just providing a situation where the opposite principles are true.
 
Yeah, this is long...but hear me out and see if some of this doesn't ring true for some of you...it may sound familiar...

This is coming from someone who has been a roundwound string player for 30 years of gigging in mostly rock cover/original bands. Hopefully this might give those who might be thinking of trying flatwounds some insight if you switch over. Since switching over to flats, I have come to find a few things that (as a roundwound player with admitted disdain for flats) are really misconceptions about flats. Every time I've tried flats I really hated my tone when practicing or playing by myself. Too dull. I tried them on gigs on and off over the years, but always with the idea I wasn't going to like them anyway, so I never gave them a fair chance.

For those who might be considering switching to flats but may not dig that 'dull' sound when you first put them on and play by yourself, I can relate. When I first tried them they sounded dull and all I got with mids and highs boosted was a lot of fingerboard ‘clack’. I had conditioned myself to expect that piano like brilliance and sustain with new strings so when I put flats on for the first time they just sound like very old, dull roundwounds but with no sustain at all. I messed around with my EQ trying to obtain that old familiar roundwound sound but just couldn’t find it. The flats look good on the bass and they feel great and I keep trying and trying to like them, but I just ain’t digging them. I keep thinking I just need to give them some time but honestly I can’t even hold out long enough to do that. Like opening the fridge over and over expecting something tasty to suddenly appear in there where there wasn’t anything before, I keep picking my bass up hoping that maybe this time the flatwounds will sound good. I mess around with my amp yet again, but they still won’t sound like rounds. Sound familiar?

Geddy Lee, Chris Squire, John Entwistle…those were the cats I was always trying to emulate. Busting my chops trying to cop their licks and be the best bass player I could be. It was all about ME and MY sound. I had to have that distinct, growly, bright roundwound sound. But honestly in the 30 years of gigging in rock bands, only one band did covers of Rush, Yes or the Who. Over the last few years, it was Wooten, Clarke, and a host of other “lead” bass guitar players that were inspiring my quest to advance my playing. I got hung up on the never ending buzz here on Talkbass about lightweight amps and cabs, active basses and the love for the “monster” players who were really noticed for their own individual style (as if any band they might be in was even relevant). I want to be the best bass player I can be so of course I should keep trying to emulate those slapping, popping, wankfest monsters too, right? Interesting that none of these awesome bass players today play the kind of music I love, which is hard rock. Not metal, and not necessarily the root/eighth note drones…but good driving rock and roll. What was I thinking?

Currently the band I’m playing in (like most others I played in) is all classic, hard rock. Besides the drummer, we have two guitarists and a keyboardist. Surely I need those bright roundwounds in order to stand out among them, right? A funny thing happened to me at a gig a couple months ago. The drummer and I were always talking about the powerful rhythm sections of bands we covered. It got me thinking of my role as a bass player. For years I wanted people to notice me and my bass playing instead of thinking of how we could be this powerful force of what makes rock music what it is.

One gig (while still playing roundwounds) I went out front during soundcheck and really paid attention to how the rhythm section sounded. Normally I would be thinking only about MY sound, but this time I listened to how my sound fit with the drummer. My bass sounded clean, bright and cut through and I could hear my tone very well onstage and through the PA…except when the whole band was playing. It hit me that for all the great roundwound tone I had, it was pretty much gone when the entire band played…and actually the rhythm section sounded weak. Yeah, it was loud, but overall the rhythm section was anemic. And we have kick-ass subwoofers but it wasn’t cutting it. It wasn’t the volume, it was the lack of that synchronistic punch of the drums and bass together.

Since I’ve switched to flatwounds I’ve noticed some things I would have never considered before. Flats are powerful strings. Playing alone, they aren’t anything special. They still seem a bit dull to me playing alone. It’s when I play bass with flats, along with the whole band, that my bass just comes alive. Using a pick with flatwounds when you are locked in with the drummer is just plain POWER. When playing by myself, I’m not getting that bright sound like rounds give me, but within the band context flats have a tone that is so punchy. With rounds I have that sound that sticks out and allows me to slap and solo and say to everyone “look at me” but with Flats the RHYTHM SECTION has that sound that just punches people in the chest and smacks them upside the head. With flats it’s ALL about the power of the low end. I no longer give a crap if anyone notices me. I only care that they are grooving to the whole band.

With roundwounds I feel sonically my bass was getting too messed up with the guitars and keyboards and leaving the drummer sit down in the low end alone. I think roundwounds have too many overtones, sustain too much and lack real definition and attack that a bass should have. Yes they are bright and stand out, but in a guitard kind of way. And honestly with so many great bass players today pushing the envelope about what bass means, bass is becoming a lower tuned guitar. I’m fine with others doing that, but I no longer want that. Flats give me attack, punch and a tightness I never knew existed. I never gave flats a chance, all because of preconceived notions and how I felt about how MY bass sounded alone instead of how WE sounded as a band. Flats take me out of the guitar realm and place me right back in the low end with the drums…out of guitard world and back into the rhythm section where I belong. Now there is a LOW END. Now as a rock band WE have POWER.

All because of flats? Maybe not, but it sure has changed my approach to playing bass. I don’t solo and there is nothing subtle about my playing in a rock band. Where rounds gave me the piano tone, flats give me a sledgehammer. Funny how I used rounds to stand out, but I actually ended up getting lost in the mix, whereas flats give me my own space now. That sonic space is down below the guitars, even if I play up higher. There is just no mistaking my bass in the mix now. It’s all there and it’s ALL BASS!

For those who are thinking about switching to flats. Consider why you play bass and what you feel your role is within the context of the band. You certainly don’t have to stand in the background and play root notes just because you play with flats. But you should think about yourself as a musician in a band. And if you play in a rock band, consider what ROCK music is all about and how you fit into it as the bass player in the rhythm section. Flats do not need to be dull. In fact, in many ways bright flats have more ‘snap’ and ‘bite’ than even rounds do (in a different way), especially in a live setting. Rounds sound brighter when playing alone, but more like a guitar in a band setting. With flats the opposite is true. Flats sound duller alone but more distinct in a band setting than rounds do. I feel that it’s all in how flats seem to produce more fundamental of each note without weird overtones. From the lowest note to the highest, with flats the notes smack you in the face instead of singing to you. Perhaps that’s why I’m a flat convert. I realized I didn’t want my bass to sing…I want it to hit you and knock your lazy ass off that barstool. :D


NOTE: Apologies to roundwound low end guitards and lazy drunks. No offense intended. ;)

I agree 100%!! That happened to me too. Now I actually think rounds sound kind of far off and undefined. Granted, it depends on the context, but I play 50s rock and early Beatles, and a piano-bright tone really just doesn't work for what I am doing now.

I love flats!
 
Much appreciated. I'm considering Chromes and TIs to get a taste. Only issue is the break in time means it could be several months before I get a "true" feel for each string. Oh well, that is part of the fun in the quest for tone.

I'm on a Corvette $$, so I've got plenty of growl. DR Lowriders sounded great with a pick, but they were a bit rough on the fingers (SS). I like the slickery feel of flats. I'm also tending to run the trebble almost all the way down, so bright isn't what I need either. Perhaps the TI road is for me.

If you have lots of tonal flexibility, I'd go for a string that doesn't offer a lot of strength in a particular freq area. GHS Brite Flats I found a good all-around string. I went specialized because of a tone issue I had with my bass. FWIW... but as you say, it's a journey! And I'm not from LA. Just kidding!! :hiding:
 
My rock band has two guitars, but the three of us rarely double one another. We make triads using octave chords (and the root for me). In this setting, that bright tone is ESSENTIAL to the mix coming together. Together, our band is a wall of sound, but if any of us stood out too much tonally, it would sound disjointed. We all have our own space within the harmony, less so within the tonal spectrum.

Anyway, I'm not disagreeing with you, just providing a situation where the opposite principles are true.

I understand completely. I've been playing on rounds for 30 years and yes, there were bands where (for the type of music we were doing) the rounds were a better fit, and still would be today if that band were still together. Cool that you found a way to gain separation from guitars by playing different yet complimentary parts. The music I play doesn't allow for that too much.

And for what it's worth, I love roundwounds and always have. I want to get a Rick again someday and string it up with the brightest rounds I can find. I just like that sound.

I play in three bands. One is an all original band that I use both flats and rounds with depending (but most of that is studio work). I don't play much with that band. One is more of a rockabilly/country jazz thing (very eclectic) and while you might think it would possibly necessitate playing with flats, rounds suit the situation better. Go figure. That band very seldom plays out except for special events.

But the main reason for me switching to flats is because the bulk of my playing is with a very loud, hard, classic rock band. I've been searching for something to tighten up the rhythm section's sound (not playing tight...the sound of the bass and drums being locked together) and flats work better for that (for me that is...and I don't know why I have to keep adding that. It should be obvious this is from my point of view).

I've come to find that flats have had numerous other benefits in this band's context which I have mentioned many times in this thread. It's the sum of all what flats offer that converted me. I seldom use rounds anymore because I have found flats to suit my playing style and band situation more. There is a place for rounds and I'd be the last person to knock rounds as they are still very much loved by me as a bass player.
 
Ultimately it is a personal choice, no right or wrong, when it comes to using flats or rounds. My T-birds have rounds and always will. And yet, I now have rounds on my Rickenbacker basses and love that tone.

As for claims that amateurs use flats and pros use rounds, that's just ridiculous.

Paul McCartney uses flats, and he is a professional bassplayer, the last time I checked!:)
 
way to change your post via the edit function.
Link Removed


way to miss the joke: you said "bye" in one post, then jumped back in shortly after that, thus the fail. it had nothing to do with implying you drink; the photo was just a graphic representation of the level of fail you achieved. :rollno:


you_fail.jpg


...way to continue to tell us that you can't do it anymore and then keep coming back.
successoryinternet400.jpg


i'm sure you are a perfectly fine bassist. this is obviously not your thread. please stop telling us how much you don't like the taste of this thread, yet continue to spoon servings of it onto your plate and eat it.

everybody has made their point and we need to agree to disagree.

now, can we get back to the topic of the awesomeness of
flats in all their glory so it can be helpful to those interested in the subject? if not, can we lock this thread?

LOL!!! man the look on that cats face made me spit up tortilla chips on my computer...
 
For those who have jumped on me in previous posts...

I would bet that those who have had disagreements with me over string choice, or accused me of telling them to use flats and they are wrong if they use rounds, etc. have only read some of my posts, just parts of longer ones and mostly have taken a lot of what I've said about flats completely out of context. I can hardly blame them. I write a lot, and this is a fairly long thread. Rounds and flats are both good, but each type has it's strengths, and some of what is a strength in one situation is a liability with another.

Use whatever works. I posted this thread because I discovered flats do work for me and why they do now...when for 30 years I HATED them. So before anyone wants to get on my case again, read my posts completely before doing so. Posting comments like, "Flats don't work in every situation, so don't tell me what works for me" [I never did], or "You aren't speaking for me" [Hello? I thought I could only speak for myself anyway], or "Rounds can do what flats do" [Neither type of string does what the other does as well], etc. Well, duh...don't waste our time with the obvious, just to start a fight, alright?

Most everyone who has posted to this thread has done so with their experiences with flats and what they see as benefits of switching to flats. This thread is about what flats have to offer for those who might be thinking of switching, but need some real world info about them that is sorely lacking. If you hate flats, or want to praise roundwounds, go start another thread on it. It's already obvious what the benefit of rounds are since most play rounds or have for a long time already. Rounds are more popular and for good reason. It is exactly because flats aren't as popular that this thread came about. Lots of good info in this thread from many sources.

There has been a lot of very interesting discussions about flats in this thread that I think is valuable to those who play flats or might want to but are reluctant to do so because of preconceived ideas about them, and ill-informed prejudices towards flatwound strings. Please, lets keep this thread going with some useful information and opinions.

If anyone has a problem with me or someone else, use the PM function to work it out (p-bass and I have finally worked it out this way) without wasting everyone else's time having to sift through all this non-flatwound garbage). This is a thread on flatwound strings, not Off-Topic.

And now I'm done wasting your time too.

Back to the Flatwound discussion...:bassist:

Thanks.
 
three cheers for Sundogue!! just kidding...well said

Like i said before I've only used flats since i started playing bass, sometime in the 80's...
and have never had a problem finding my tone / place in any band I've been in;
classic & current Rock, Post Punk, Funk, early R&B, Country & Original projects...
I used Fender 9050ML's for years, they always worked fine,
the main reason, I used them is because I could afford them...
then I tried some TI jazz flats...BAM! these are my strings
I'm able to fit perfectly into any situation, each note is full and thick all the way up the fretboard
Even though the 9050's worked fine all those years, the TI's made me realize what I was missing (those sweet mids)
two points:
1. when you're rockin' out! and having fun, it doesn't matter what you use! :bassist:
2. it's awesome having a "choice" so we can create our own sound / tone,
and be an individual in a world that's all caught up in musicians trying to mimic other musicians...
 
I am so glad this thread is back on the funk track and I have re-subscribed! Now I can learn again from Everyone here. I look forward to getting (from encouragement of this thread) my Fender 9120 Black Nylon Tape Wounds.

TC guys (and gals)...

Nylons! I love nylons!

Oh- strings, you mean! :o Sorry...

Seriously, I put LaBella Nylon-Wounds on my Peavey Dyna-Bass Unity, and it's a smoker. Yep, they're a little 'clunky' sounding, but they still have a surprising top-end and some defined 'body' in the sound. Big, clunky, surprisingly well-defined. And they look cool on the Midnight-Blue/Ebony fretboarded bass. :cool:
 
I am so glad this thread is back on the funk track and I have re-subscribed! Now I can learn again from Everyone here. I look forward to getting (from encouragement of this thread) my Fender 9120 Black Nylon Tape Wounds.

TC guys (and gals)...

I do believe tapewounds are roundwounds strings...but for the purpose of the discussion here, the nylon tape gives them a funky flatwound vibe.

I had a 5 string Cirrus I strung up with tapewounds for a while a few years back. I went back to rounds then. I still have them in a package somewhere. I may have to dig them out and slap them on a bass again just to try out.
 
I gigged last night with my classic hard rock band using the Chromes on my 5 string Washburn. I'm through testing. It's a done deal. The Chromes rocked in every way!!!

I play through a Zoom B2 into an Ashdown Superfly head and two 115 neo cabs I built (see pic below). The cabs are very strong in the mids. Using a bit of compression and the EQ mostly flat (with a slight boost at 230Hz) the Chromes gave me the punch I like. I play with a pick in this band and 'punch' is about the best word to describe my sound with these strings. Every note was tight, clean and pure bass tone that was distinctly a part of the rhythm section and never lost in the mix of the guitars.

Having tried a variety of other strings with this setup (both rounds and flats), the Chromes win hands down for delivering tight punchy bass. I noticed that playing octaves or runs higher up, the bass never dropped out. The Chromes have a nice bright mid edge to them that gives my sound a percussive punch that cuts through yet still sits down in the rhythm section. It was never muddy or boomy and I've had problems with that in this room before.

Obviously whatever bass or rig one plays through has to be capable of delivering the goods. Strings aren't going to turn a crappy sounding bass or rig into pure tonal heaven. But I do think Chromes are a great flatwound to try if you like punchy bass in a rock band setting.

This is the rig I play through (though obviously not a pic at the gig)...

Link Removed
 
Just put on some strings and get out and play ! You will find what works for YOU...Don't get caught up in all this hype... It will only hold you back...Get out and play ! ! ! Sorry Sundogue,but this is the truth...Best to you all.

Yeah, I agree. I've played on lots of great, good and crappy basses, strings, amps, cabs, effects, etc. over the years. I enjoyed playing through all of them...and I could still get usable sound out of all of it and make it work. Some sounded better than others, but I doubt very many people would have known the difference (save for the musicians themselves).

It is more about the music than the gear one uses, for sure. But still, without gear music is kinda quiet. ;) So as long as we have choice, why not choose?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.