• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Controversial Opinion: Gibson Basses Questionable Design Choices

Hmmm...I’d love to play a Grabber. Every instrument I own needs tweaking, maybe the Grabber just needed a little work.

I think the reality is, I want a symmetrical, bound, gloss Gibson that’s pretty much a bass version of a Les Paul double cut that doesn’t cost $4,000.00 or more. That doesn’t currently exist. The closest I’ve found is this (No Gene hate, please):

View attachment 3753947
I like it.
 
if
That's probably true

You have the body wood? So you're going to cut the body yourself. You know you only get one shot at that. Plus you have to route the body for the neck and pickups, and drill the body for the wiring, buy the neck all the electronics, and assorted parts. If you've got the skills and the tools, right on but in the long run it might be better to buy A Jack Casady Epiphone as JPDsma reminded me, unless you just really want to build your own guitar, and there is nothing wrong with that. And you still need a case. If you want to do that get a 335 body that's already cut and routed and get a neck. Then you can get the pickups, bridge, tail piece you like and it will all be custom. You can do gold or black hardware if you don't like chrome but it will be a lot of hours to get it right. I'm sure you know that.
 
Gibson seem to be making a lot of untrue instruments .
That's because they got bought by a company that doesn't give a poopie about Gibson's history. I don't know if anybody has heard but the new company that bought Gibson is suing every other guitar company for copyright infringement for making guitars that are styled after Gibson bodies. Can you believe that?
 

Latest posts