Active for sure, gives me more control over my sound at the source. My amp basically stays flat and I tweak the tone on the bass end. Plus active I feel gives you a fuller sound. Even my passive basses I run through a Sadowsky preamp pedal.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Not having ever played an active bass I am asking for advice.
Thanks for the comments...sounds like a bass that has both is a good way to go.I like both. My #1 happens to be active, but that is just becuase it's a great bass. Having a bass with a pre-amp that allow to go from Active to Passive it's really nice and will solve your problems.
Not an expert in coutry music myself, but if I understand correctly a lot of it nowadays it's done with active basses, so that will cover you since metal is also fertile ground for active basses.
That being said, you can never go wrong with a passive bass
I am surprised that most are voting passive. I guess it depends on how much eq.you need. I think I would rather eq. from the guitar. I don't usually use any pedals. Maybe I should invest in some type of eq. pedal.I have both.
1/3 of my bottom feeders are active.
So I didn't vote...
Your prediction is correct so far...why do you think most players prefer passive?I predict passive will win but I'm sure you'll find out that many people actually like both. So your poll should feature at least three choices.
Which pedals do you use? Which do you recommend to someone who is not familiar with iq pedals?I used to only play active basses, then I got a good deal on a passive bass that became my #1. I don't feel like I'm missing out by not having an onboard preamp. I've got more tone shaping than I need on my pedal board.