• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join free Log in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Curiosity

Which is your favorite and why.

  • Active

    Votes: 73 32.9%

  • Passive

    Votes: 148 66.7%

  • Both

    Votes: 1 0.5%
  • Total voters
    222
#21
Active for sure, gives me more control over my sound at the source. My amp basically stays flat and I tweak the tone on the bass end. Plus active I feel gives you a fuller sound. Even my passive basses I run through a Sadowsky preamp pedal.
 
#24
countrybass5 said:
Not having ever played an active bass I am asking for advice.
Click to expand...

I like both. My #1 happens to be active, but that is just becuase it's a great bass. Having a bass with a pre-amp that allow to go from Active to Passive it's really nice and will solve your problems.
Not an expert in coutry music myself, but if I understand correctly a lot of it nowadays it's done with active basses, so that will cover you since metal is also fertile ground for active basses.

That being said, you can never go wrong with a passive bass
 
#25
baTassi said:
I like both. My #1 happens to be active, but that is just becuase it's a great bass. Having a bass with a pre-amp that allow to go from Active to Passive it's really nice and will solve your problems.
Not an expert in coutry music myself, but if I understand correctly a lot of it nowadays it's done with active basses, so that will cover you since metal is also fertile ground for active basses.

That being said, you can never go wrong with a passive bass
Click to expand...
Thanks for the comments...sounds like a bass that has both is a good way to go.
 
  • Like
Reactions: retslock
#26
I own both. My latest one, a PJ Knuckle is passive. My old workhorse is a 25+ year old Carvin active JJ. Go figure. I can get exactly the tone I want with the amp, but sometimes it is difficult to walk all the way back over there to make an adjustment. ;)

Don't over think this.
 
#30
I prefer passive basses. The simpler the circuit, the less chance of failure. I would rather have a P through a versatile amp than an active bass through a blah amp. Tone can be adjusted through playing technique as well as passive controls, so I never saw the need to employ an active bass. I do own one, a '92 Carvin LB70. I never got comfortable enough with it to use it very often. Too bad, it's a beautiful bass, but between it being styled loosely on a Jazz Bass (another model I never could get used to) and the 24 fret neck, I was always looking down thinking "what the..". There are many players of active basses that can make them sing. I'm not among them.
 
#31
I didn't vote for either or because, despite owning plenty of the current variety, push pull, mid-detent separating passive from active, I will never forget the time I was sitting and waiting my turn to get on stage at a popular Los Angeles suburb open mic when the host and bassist stopped in the middle of a song to announce that he needs to change his battery. The entire audience waited patiently while watching him turn 4 screws and swap out his battery. I vowed to NEVER own an active bass.
Things are different now but the lesson learned remains the same:
Don't play gigs that don't pay enough to cover the cost of a new 9 volt battery or two.
I'm going to think about it more after my girlfriend stops shouting about nothing, then I will probably vote active, after I play my Jack Casady bass for a while. .....or maybe passive.........hmmmmmmmm, Jack did prove a point .
 
#34
I used to only play active basses, then I got a good deal on a passive bass that became my #1. I don't feel like I'm missing out by not having an onboard preamp. I've got more tone shaping than I need on my pedal board.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom
Back