Yes they could. But I've just been noodling on the couch for about an hour, and I think I live with unbalanced tension.
The only people that think that are the people who have never played a balanced set
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Yes they could. But I've just been noodling on the couch for about an hour, and I think I live with unbalanced tension.
I gotta wait till these Dragon Skinz get old before I try these out..
I recently ordered a pack of these new EXL220BT with a 130 B string and to my fingers, they feel WAY floppy :-(
I've never used 40-55-70-95 but I guess I didn't double check the gauge and thought that they'd be the equivalent to my norm of 45-105 with a 130 B string
Right now, I'm probably going to stick with my Sadowsky Blue Labels...I happen to like a "tighter" string tension and "if it ain't broke don't fix it"....but in the event that I'm totally clueless regarding "balanced tension sets" please feel free to she'd some light![]()
I recently ordered a pack of these new EXL220BT with a 130 B string and to my fingers, they feel WAY floppy :-(
I've never used 40-55-70-95 but I guess I didn't double check the gauge and thought that they'd be the equivalent to my norm of 45-105 with a 130 B string
Right now, I'm probably going to stick with my Sadowsky Blue Labels...I happen to like a "tighter" string tension and "if it ain't broke don't fix it"....but in the event that I'm totally clueless regarding "balanced tension sets" please feel free to she'd some light![]()
Hoo boy! You're not going to like this, but the closest tension B to that set is a .145! No way I'd ever use that, so maybe on the B string I'd sacrifice a little tension not to play a telephone cable. However, I could be wrong and it could feel just great. I really don't play 5-string enough to know or careStill...that's a thick darn B string.
Here's D'addario's tension chart:
http://daddario.com/upload/tension_chart_13934.pdf
You'll be able to slap together a set of Chromes pretty closely matched soon. D'addario's about to start selling all their strings as singles. But they likely won't start selling BT sets until they see how they do with XL's.
Thanks... Jason @ BSO said the same thing 3 months ago... hopefully any day now![]()
Yeah, it's pretty thick; not quite a telephone cable, but I can understand your misgivings.Hoo boy! You're not going to like this, but the closest tension B to that set is a .145! No way I'd ever use that, so maybe on the B string I'd sacrifice a little tension not to play a telephone cable. However, I could be wrong and it could feel just great. I really don't play 5-string enough to know or careStill...that's a thick darn B string.
The .095 and the .125 are the E and B strings on my Ibanez Mikro 5-string. They're both way too floppy for my tastes
Hoo boy! You're not going to like this, but the closest tension B to that set is a .145! No way I'd ever use that, so maybe on the B string I'd sacrifice a little tension not to play a telephone cable. However, I could be wrong and it could feel just great. I really don't play 5-string enough to know or careStill...that's a thick darn B string.
Here's D'addario's tension chart:
http://daddario.com/upload/tension_chart_13934.pdf
Agreed! Differences in tension across the strings has never been an issue with me.
I think having so much choice has allowed people to unleash their inner nitpicker.![]()
Well personally i see many advantages to having tension fall gently from low to high (the opposite of tradition), so many advantages i'm too lazy to list them all right nowWhy wouldn't you want balanced tension?