• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Darkglass Anagram Multi FX Announced

For Anagram options, I'm just not clear on how to set up a signal chain where I can use the 3 foot switches to use the Octave, OD, Envelope.
Which mode would be the best way to go ? Scene?, Stomp? or Preset ? And is there a clear "How-To" step by step thing that I can reference (I have not seen one other than something I generated with Google AI and I'm not sure that's accurate).

Can any of you experienced Anagram/MultiFX folks help a brother out ?
Here are the basics, and some of the videos out there may help if you have specific, deep-dive functions that aren't making sense.
  • For the use you describe, I would start simple and use 'stomp' mode. It will replicate what you're used to with a traditional, analog pedalboard. i.e. You can turn the pedals on/off as you like with the simple press of a footswitch.
  • Signal chain on screen goes left (input/beginning of chain) to right (end of chain).
  • Add each effect 'block' you want to a preset in stomp mode (press the '+' to add each block) in the order you'd typically set these up on your analog board - at least as a starting point.
  • To assign each of the 3 footswitches to octave, OD, and envelope:
    • Press a footswitch and tap the '+' that momentarily pops up on screen above that switch.
    • Select the effect block you want to toggle on/off with that switch.
    • That will open the parameters for that effect block, and the little on/off toggle at the top of the parameter screen is what you'll tap.
    • If done correctly, you'll see a little colored highlight under that effect block which matches the color around the footswitch it is assigned to.
  • Don't forget to save (disk icon in the upper left, next to the preset name)
  • Helpful tip: There's an input signal meter on the left side of the screen and an output meter on the right side. Aside from your ears, this is a helpful tool for dialing in unity gain, boosts, etc.
 
I agree. This one is very perplexing. I’d much rather have a smaller screen with bottom row switches.

Still deciding on whether to run MIDI with the Anagram. If you have a scene change command, can you still have the Anagram in stomp mode but have midi change scenes?
I'm just gonna be the question answering guy on here tonight...

You can achieve what you seem to be describing, but you sort of do it in reverse. i.e. If you have the Anagram in stomp mode, you don't have access to changing scenes, because you are limited to binding each block parameter (including on/off toggle) to any given footswitch/control a single time. Meaning you cant have multiple footswitches on the Anagram or MIDI device controlling the same parameter on any given block in stomp mode. The way to do this is to sort of reverse the approach - run in scene mode on the Anagram, and then bind different blocks to your MIDI footswitches to 'stomp' them on/off within each scene.

I'm doing this using my MC6 Pro with the Anagram. I run in Stomp mode 90% of the time, but I have a few presets that make more sense to run in scene mode - though I still wanted to be able to toggle certain blocks on/off within each scene. I use a basic 'home page' setup for a bunch of different presets on the MC6. For the couple presets that I want to use in scene mode, I just have that patch on the MIDI controller send the Anagram a command to change to that preset and a command to switch from stomp > scene mode with the same button press. Then I assign different footswitches on the MIDI controller to toggle blocks on/off within that scene, while the three switches on the Anagram itself are being used to actually change between the three scenes in that preset. The biggest thing here is that you need to setup your stomp mode patches on the MIDI controller to send a signal to the Anagram for the desired preset and the desired 'mode'. This way you're never accidentally jumping to a preset in the 'wrong' mode. It's one extra step, but it offers a lot of flexibility.
 
I did appreciate @IvanBassists video about keeping things simple. I generally play 90% clean (but with a Cali76 comp and a Noble in my non-Anagram signal chain), so simple settings should work for me for the most part.

For FX, I'd like to have a Octave (-1 and +1 .. I use an OC5 now) , light/med OD, Envelope Filter/Wah (I use an MXR Bass Envelope Filter for this on my old board). These would replicate my current board options. Longer term I'd like to add the MXR Bass Synth via FX loop, but I'd like to start by just replicating what I can do today with my pedal board.

For Anagram options, I'm just not clear on how to set up a signal chain where I can use the 3 foot switches to use the Octave, OD, Envelope.
Which mode would be the best way to go ? Scene?, Stomp? or Preset ? And is there a clear "How-To" step by step thing that I can reference (I have not seen one other than something I generated with Google AI and I'm not sure that's accurate).

Can any of you experienced Anagram/MultiFX folks help a brother out ?

thanks!

With the caveat that there is no right/wrong way, and everyone will have their preferred way, as a starting point maybe this might help.

It really depends not just what is on your pedalboard (physical or 'virtual') but the 'combinations'. How do you use these different pedals? Based on using a 'stock' sound, do you tend to then just jump on the Octave by itself for a section, or use it for an entire song? Do you want to sometimes use the Octaver and OD together, but other times not?

There's nothing wrong with, or stopping you from, setting up your Octaver block, OD block, and Env. Filter blocks in Anagram in Stomp mode and using the 3 footswitches to turn each of them On/Off. Quite literally emulating a physical pedalboard and how you might use it. Want to turn multiple blocks on/off with the same Footswitch? Sure, you can also do that.

You can do the same with Scenes. A Scene is essentially a 'snapshot', within a Preset, of all blocks states (i.e. on/off, their settings, etc.). So you can then use this for more complex combination of pedals in different on/off states, and/or with different parameters. For example (a simple one at that):
Scene A - Clean
Scene B - Clean + OD on light
Scene C - Clean + Octaver + OD on medium

Presets are that 'top level' container (well, technically a 'Bank' is, but a Bank is just 3 Presets with no other configuration involved).
You want to use different sets of blocks for different sounds? You could do it in a single Preset with multiple Scenes.. until such time as it is getting too complex, or you run out of slots for blocks, or you want to do splits/merges or FX Loop inserts in different places in the signal chain.. That's a pretty good sign you should be using different Presets.

You'll often find you'll start with 1 Preset, then evolve it, then add complexity, and then get to the point where you go "I need to start over". So copy that Preset to another slot, and start taking away stuff, adding more stuff. Next thing you know, you have a quite different Preset.
 
Crazy. With NAMs I get a Perfect Guitar Sound (for my needs). What Are You missing?
Nothing, I haven’t used them 😅 I mainly use the NDSP plugins when playing guitar (Fortin Nameless, Petrucci), which is rarely. I dabbled a bit but never got into captures with either platform. I don’t prefer the more static nature of them. I want to be able tweak on the fly, not scour the interwebs for some other capture, if I even have access at the time (no Internet at band rehearsal room—a fortified WWII-era German bunker).

Parallax was the far bigger reason. I’ve spent dozens and dozens of hours over the past 4 months trying to dial in a tone I like as much as what I use in my band with Parallax. While I’ve dialed in many great ones on Anagram, nothing has quite gotten as close to my goals as my existing tried-and-true Parallax preset. There’s just some extra magic going on there behind the scenes that’s geared towards my modern metal needs.
 
Last edited:
i have the Parallax on PC and i like it, but i do not get the same amazing result i get with the Anagram and a Dug NAM. Also modern metal needs.

So in the end it comes down to personal taste. Also i like that all updating effort on the Anagram goes into bass. On QC it is guitar first.
The advantage of the QC Mini is, of course, that the platform exists longer and has a headstart to the Anagram.

I prefer the footswitch layout on the Anagram btw. .
 
I don't own an Anagram yet, but it's at the top of my wish-list. Concerning the competing modelers, I would like to think sound quality would be the number one issue for me. I want the best possible sound, period. The bass-centric focus of the Anagram and the DG selection of amps seems more interesting, and people seem to be saying that it sounds great.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scott McArron
I don't own an Anagram yet, but it's at the top of my wish-list. Concerning the competing modelers, I would like to think sound quality would be the number one issue for me. I want the best possible sound, period. The bass-centric focus of the Anagram and the DG selection of amps seems more interesting, and people seem to be saying that it sounds great.

We’re way past sound quality even having to be a consideration at these higher levels.

Everything sounds great these days, cheap gear, expensive gear, all sounds amazing.

I shop by size, io and features. Obviously if it sounds bad it goes back but it’s got to tick all the other boxes to get bought in the first place.
 
i have the Parallax on PC and i like it, but i do not get the same amazing result i get with the Anagram and a Dug NAM. Also modern metal needs.

That’s great if it fits your specific needs. But it is a fairly static solution using a capture. You can’t really tweak it on the fly or change it completely for different genre needs without having to search the webs for another “just right” capture. I really don’t like that approach.

So in the end it comes down to personal taste. Also i like that all updating effort on the Anagram goes into bass. On QC it is guitar first.
The advantage of the QC Mini is, of course, that the platform exists longer and has a headstart to the Anagram.
I do like the Anagram footswitch layout. However, a design that allows a 7” screen with 4 rows utilizing only 4 dual purpose footswitch/rotary dials rather than 3 dedicated footswitches and 6 dedicated dials in the same footprint is pure minimalist genius maximizing results!

I prefer the footswitch layout on the Anagram btw. .
Absolutely! I plan to keep both pedals, I may not even keep the QC mini, but I definitely want to try it out in my workflow for my current band needs.

Anagram is faaaaaar better for a full scope of bass needs. No contest. Mine isn’t going anywhere any time soon 😊
 
Last edited:
That’s great if it fits your specific needs. But it is a fairly static solution using a capture. You can’t really tweak it on the fly or change it completely for different genre needs without having to search the webs for another “just right” capture. I really don’t like that approach.


I do like the Anagram footswitch layout. However, a design that allows a 7” screen with 4 rows utilizing only 4 dual purpose footswitch/rotary dials rather than 3 dedicated footswitches and 6 dedicated dials in the same footprint is pure minimalist genius maximizing results!


Absolutely! I plan to keep both pedals, I may not even keep the QC mini, but I definitely want to try it out in my workflow for my current band needs.

Anagram is faaaaaar better for a full scope of bass needs. No contest. Mine isn’t going anywhere any time soon 😊
With the QC, im basically using my own captures, capturing my own gear and sounds in order to have a smaller board - I've still been using certain combinations of pedals and preamps in the loops which wouldn't initially capture correctly.

I'd been looking into the anagram as a backup to my main sound, but with how amazing the QC V2 captures are, I could run my entire sound just using the Quad Cortex now, with all my own captures.

I still enjoy my full board, but something like the QC Mini is the perfect way for me to "Backup" the QC and my own captured sounds, I would still keep the QC board with the pedals in the loops for my "sound creation" if that makes sense.


I can totally see how the anagram is better for a lot of people, but the ease and quality of the QC captures and how precious I am over my own sound, plus now even being able to capture my limiters and compressors - the QC is unbeatable for me.
 
That’s great if it fits your specific needs. But it is a fairly static solution using a capture. You can’t really tweak it on the fly or change it completely for different genre needs without having to search the webs for another “just right” capture. I really don’t like that approach.

I don't know if you tried it, but i can tweak the Nam quite a bit. Even choosing the amount of distortion...

And as i am always curious about new gear, i will try the Mini myself, too. But i don't feel the need to be an early buyer...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scott McArron
I don't know if you tried it, but i can tweak the Nam quite a bit. Even choosing the amount of distortion...

And as i am always curious about new gear, i will try the Mini myself, too. But i don't feel the need to be an early buyer...
I’ve dabbled. I have few X7 captures up in the NDSP cloud. Captures just aren’t a workflow strategy I like. I far prefer amp models and plugins.
 
For the new expression pedal announced by Darkglass, it needs power for the LEDs, but I don't see any ports for external power. Does it only run on 9v batteries? How long do those last?

I'm assuming it will still work without batteries, just no LEDs.

I'd rather not have to worry about batteries when it's on my board which has power.
 
As a newbie to the Anagram and multiFX in general, I'm going to ask some newb type questions.
I have played around with the Anagram for the past week or so. I have read the manual (not sure I really absorbed it, but I tried). I also went to the TB Wiki and signed on to AnagramAnswers.

So, I like many of the sounds I have heard while just paging though all the Factory and User settings (my unit was used and the prior owner definitely populated the User settings). I can definitely see using the elements (assets?) to make a good signal chain. All of it is kind of overwhelming TBH, b1ut I'm determined to try to set it up for use in my live work.

I did appreciate @IvanBassists video about keeping things simple. I generally play 90% clean (but with a Cali76 comp and a Noble in my non-Anagram signal chain), so simple settings should work for me for the most part.

For FX, I'd like to have a Octave (-1 and +1 .. I use an OC5 now) , light/med OD, Envelope Filter/Wah (I use an MXR Bass Envelope Filter for this on my old board). These would replicate my current board options. Longer term I'd like to add the MXR Bass Synth via FX loop, but I'd like to start by just replicating what I can do today with my pedal board.

For Anagram options, I'm just not clear on how to set up a signal chain where I can use the 3 foot switches to use the Octave, OD, Envelope.
Which mode would be the best way to go ? Scene?, Stomp? or Preset ? And is there a clear "How-To" step by step thing that I can reference (I have not seen one other than something I generated with Google AI and I'm not sure that's accurate).

Can any of you experienced Anagram/MultiFX folks help a brother out ?

thanks!
If you want to control the individual pedals blocks, like turn on/off the octave, OD or envelope, then it's better to do it on stomp mode. The scene mode is better when you want to change multiple parameters in diferent effects at the same time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rodrigo EV
Picking up one of these in a trade, excited to try it after trying and failing to downsize with the QC (great for guitar), and wanting a bit more options than the analog pedals I can fit on a mono lite+. The recent additions of the doom2, bass wah, and more oc-2 like octaver pushed me over the edge on it.

Quick questions I couldn't find the answer to in the wiki etc:

- does the Lehle dual expression work ok, and if so, is it possible to set the toe switch to activate whatever you're using it for (wah/whammy/vol)?

The last part seems like a no, since the anagram doesn't work with aux switches

- can you leave the anagram itself in scene mode and do complex changes on the three footswitches, and still add a midi footswitch to on/off single pedals via binds? Or are you more limited in scene mode, where you'd be stuck with things like preset up/down?

- niche question - has anyone fit the darkglass midi footswitch below the anagram on a board like a mono lite or nano, without too much overhang?

My use case is to pop the mono lite+ into the mono tick on my mono gig bag, so I can't have too much overhang in any direction or the board won't fit into the tick. Seems like the dimensions are right on the edge, once you factor in needing to add a slim right angle USB c fable

If the darkglass won't fit, I'm considering getting the pirate midi aero instead since it's a bit more compact but seems to be a better put together option than the mwave stuff:


Here's a pic of my board at a recent gig, for good measure:

372A5626-6C64-40E3-944D-10FB3D4D2C19.jpeg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: agedhorse