Darkglass Anagram Multi FX Announced

[Chace90]

Woof. Yeah skimming thru I'm pretty sure he got the order wrong. I heard him say the reverse order several times

Of course the placement is all personal, but he clearly thought the signal was running right to left. Sort of an interesting experiment I suppose

 

[Barticus]

What’s June 6th, another couple of weeks?

Requiring tremendous patience, all to save $300

 

[MrDinsdale]

Is there a Pultec EQ on the Anagram? There should be one. I’ve got Pultec inspired plugin in my DAW, it works really well to do the « Pultec Trick », it would be great to have that on the Anagram.

There's a bunch of Lowrider pedal captures on QC which I use lots. Its all that sort of stuff that is the biggest barrier to jumping ship to the Anagram for me, an actual pultec eq block would be great though!

 

[silky smoove]

The Pultec trick can likely be achieved with either of the EQ blocks or the global EQ. Boost down low and cut just above the boost. That’s all there is to the actual EQ moves of the trick.

 

[MrDinsdale]

The Pultec trick can likely be achieved with either of the EQ blocks or the global EQ. Boost down low and cut just above the boost. That’s all there is to the actual EQ moves of the trick.

I thought there was a little more nuance to it but worth a try to get close. Either way just having a block that recreates it without tweaking multiple blocks would be ideal.

 

[Synh]

No Pultec-style EQ, but I'm trying to reproduce it using the global EQ and a block EQ. Example: +6dB at 60Hz global EQ. -4dB at 80Hz on the block EQ.

 

[sunbeast]

I thought there was a little more nuance to it but worth a try to get close. Either way just having a block that recreates it without tweaking multiple blocks would be ideal.

Both boost and cut on a Pultec centered at 100hz (in this case, but probably most bassists might choose the 60Hz frequency?). The dip happens quite a bit higher than the center frequency due to the way the two curves interact. It kinda looks like boost is a shelving type filter while cut is a peaking/notch filter?

 

[Wagner Cruz]

What’s June 6th, another couple of weeks?

View attachment 7234837
Requiring tremendous patience, all to save $300

hi, 300 ?

 

[calypsocoral302]

Does anyone know if this pedal can reproduce the Microtubes Infinity Modes 1, 4, & 5 (LPF+Compressor combined with HPF+Distortion)?
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

 

[geowis]

Does anyone know if this pedal can reproduce the Microtubes Infinity Modes 1, 4, & 5 (LPF+Compressor combined with HPF+Distortion)?
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

It should, as you can split and then merge the signal.

 

[BrianVengeance]

Does anyone know if this pedal can reproduce the Microtubes Infinity Modes 1, 4, & 5 (LPF+Compressor combined with HPF+Distortion)?
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

Definitely doable with split and merge blocks.

 

[silky smoove]

I thought there was a little more nuance to it but worth a try to get close. Either way just having a block that recreates it without tweaking multiple blocks would be ideal.

There’s not much more to it than a low frequency boost followed by a cut at a higher frequency. The knob labels on the actual Pultec EQP-1A make it look more esoteric than it actually is. The physical hardware unit imparts a bit of color as well, but the essence of the trick is really as simple as described above. It should be possible with a single EQ block or the global EQ. The curves and Q factor of the available EQs within the Anagram probably won’t match exactly what an EQP-1A does, but in practice it hardly matters. You’re boosting lows and then cutting right after to avoid having the added low end sound bloated in the upper bass and lower midrange, which can sound muddy/cloudy in many mixes and environments.

 

[Bleezar]

Is there a Pultec EQ on the Anagram? There should be one. I’ve got Pultec inspired plugin in my DAW, it works really well to do the « Pultec Trick », it would be great to have that on the Anagram.

There is this EQP-1A NAM capture you can try out, but just on those settings tho

Pultec - EQP-1A NAM Profile · TONE3000

Check out metsi's neural outboard capture and use it in your recording: Source: Access Analog Calibration: +22dBu Channels: R Input: TTS Input v10b Architecture: xSTD · Pultec - EQP-1A · tube and nam

www.tone3000.com

 

[Chrishi87]

And Tone3000 starts to suck.
People who name their presets 1,2 or ADFWER, or low quality stuff like the newer Ampeg SVT4 which sounds like Dogsh!t... well.

 

[mam1862]

I just received mine a couple of days ago. Between yesterday and I got to spend some time with it. First off the tuner is very good and will be very readable in a live setting. Originally I set up my first preset right to left. I didn’t realize that it was wrong until I saw a post that said that it should be left to right. It sounded a whole lot better left to right. I owned a Quad Cortex some time back but could never bond with it. This thing is much easier to navigate and sounds great. For my use I’m gonna set up 3 to 6 presets to use live. Switching back and forth looks real easy and quick.

 

[MultiScaleMale]

The Cioks DC-7 and Crux combination are listed as not compatible with the Nano but needs the Nano+. Well, it will fit although the spacing is tight under the Nano.

 

[MultiScaleMale]

Realized that I should post the power supply side pic. Oops.

 

[SteveC]

Isn’t the DC7 enough to power both those units? I have a GLXD+ and a Stomp on my Nano and a DC7 underneath. I’m debating an Anagram and thought I’d have plenty of power if I did.

 

[BrianVengeance]

Isn’t the DC7 enough to power both those units? I have a GLXD+ and a Stomp on my Nano and a DC7 underneath. I’m debating an Anagram and thought I’d have plenty of power if I did.

Anagram takes up to 2A under heavy load - you could try a current tripling cable or add the Crux extension, which is what a lot of folks have done.

 

[Chace90]

If not a current tripling cable, certainly a current quadrupling cable would? 4 ports at 660ma each, more than enough!