Kaamos is digital as well (at least the octaver part, and presumably also the drive), so should be identical in theory
AFAIK, the effects/amps/etc in the Anagram aren't NAM-based models, and could well have been created using similar component-based modeling to Line 6. Feedback on the digital versions of all the Darkglass stuff that has been released the last few years are generally pretty good, so seemingly they're doing a good job at whatever digital modeling they are utilizing to create their algorithms. Line 6 uses component-based modeling for most of their effects and amps- meaning they recreate the sounds of devices from the ground up using models of what each component (every resistor, capacitor, transistor, tube) of a known signal path should do to a signal- when it comes to trying to model what a tube or analog transistor does to the signal there are bound to be compromises and those stack up. NAM models are created instead by comparing the difference between a recording of a clean DI and a recording of the effected sound from some device/process and trying to build an algorithm to recreate that difference (so rather than ground-up modeling of a signal path like a Helix, it is more like a "top down" approach that is unconcerned with any of the details of the actual signal path).
The Anagram has provided effects/amp models as well as the ability to run NAM and AIDA-X capture models. NAM/AIDA-X models represent a single sound state that was captured (say "Rat pedal with Distortion on 10, Volume on 5 and Filter on 5"), and so you don't get all the tweakable controls of the original amp/pedal/etc that component-based models like the Helix (or other Anagram effects/amps) allow. The Anagram is capable of running NAM models, so you can download single states of different drive pedals and amps that others have captured (or capture your own devices) and try to tweak them using external EQs before or after the NAM profile which will probably not work the same as tweaking the actual controls on that amp/pedal.
