That pretty much mirrors my own "mechanic's intuition" on it Matthew. Let me sorta think aloud here, relating the bass to what I know of organ pipe acoustics. The 'cavity' of the bass, or the "vibrating air column" as we refer to in pipes, that is formed by the top, back and ribs, acts precisely like a stoppered wooden organ pipe, primarily with respect to determining the cubic volume of air contained inside it, which directly determines it's pitch. A stoppered organ pipe is tuned by pushing the stopper inward- reducing the cubic volume and raising the pitch, or pulling the stopper outward, increasing the cubic volume and lowering the pitch. (a capped metal pipe is precisely the same thing, tuned by moving the cap up and down) The cubic volume alone, in organ pipes anyway, determines the frequency of that "single pitch that is either boosted or attenuated" as you described above.
The shape however, of an organ pipe really only affects the tone quality, i.e. the harmonic series produced by the pipe, perceived as either a "brighter" or "darker" or "flutier" tone, and I think this relates to basses as well. The most critical factor in determining its tonal character, is the ratio of a pipe's length to its diameter. An A-440 can be produced by a pipe that is 54" long and 1-1/2" diam (producing a Viol De Gamba sound), or one that is 40" long and 3" diameter (producing a Bass Flute sound), or any ratio in between as long as the cubic volume remains the same. Similarly, different degrees of tapered pipe bodies are used for different tones, and this taper is expressed as a ratio, such as 1/4 or 1/3, meaning that the top of the pipe is 1/4 or 1/3 the diameter of the pipe diameter at it's mouth, and this is manipulated to achieve certain tone qualities. I think this directly relates to the tone produced in a given bass, by the size of the shoulders, the width of the ribs, and other factors that form the overall "taper" of the body of the bass, attenuated as well by the size and location of the F holes and C bouts, and the internal curvatures of the various walls of the bass. Darker, bassier orchestral basses are far less "tapered" than my brighter, more mid-rangey Eastman bass with its narrow shoulders and tapered ribs, in my somewhat limited experience with orchestral instruments. Am I far off with that assessment?
(The volume and projection of a bass I would think are more a function of the hardness, thickness, and mass of the woods used to build it, among other lesser factors, if the physics of organ pipe sound production apply to the bass as well. Low frequencies in sufficient volume to fill a church sanctuary can only be produced by pipes of hard, thick walls with lots of mass, whether made of metal or wood. Lower mass = less volume.)
But getting back to the wolf notes - if, as I am proposing, the cubic volume is the primary, but not the sole determinant of the natural resonant pitch of the bass cavity, and a wolf note is a frequency that's in direct physical conflict with the natural frequency or harmonics of the bass cavity itself, the cubic volume would really have to be changed to affect the resonant pitch significantly, right? Hence the extreme difficulty of eliminating it altogether. To truly "eliminate" it, and change the resonant frequency of the bass cavity, you'd have to add a rather large piece of wood inside the bass somewhere to reduce the cubic volume, I would think. But how and where?, and how to do it in such a way as to not adversely affect some other aspect of the bass' tone?