TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
It might not be obvious that the 45-105 set has 60-80 for the D and A strings, if we're talking medium scale sets. That's worth noting and not obvious to those who don't check details.You mean, beyond the obvious?
It might not be obvious that the 45-105 set has 60-80 for the D and A strings, if we're talking medium scale sets. That's worth noting and not obvious to those who don't check details.
Thanks for the replies.
I should have clarified my reasons for wanting to explore the Dunlops.
I find that on the long gigs, the fingers on both my hands are sore.
reading about the Dunlops, it seems that people find them easier on the fingers.
My question is more focussed on which gauge will be most helpful in this case, or whether they yield a similar result on the fingers?
I had the same experience with my 32” Serek concerning the silk wrap.
Kind of a pain to trim but nice strings.
I think 45 vs 40 and 105 vs 100 are pretty obvious and if op wants less tension, and stiffness, solution is obvious..but yeah, this is talkbassIt might not be obvious that the 45-105 set has 60-80 for the D and A strings, if we're talking medium scale sets. That's worth noting and not obvious to those who don't check details.
Are you sure you bought the medium scale set or is your Serek a Sacramento? With the string thru I had to trim mine as well.
In my experience, 100 chromes are stiffer than 105 Dunlops. It’s also my opinion that the Dunlops sound and feel much better than the chromes, but that is subjective. Tension however is not.Thinking about changing from Chromes ECB81M to Dunlops.
Tossing up between the 40/100 and the 45/105 sets in medium scale.
Has anyone tried both gauges?