• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Disadvantages to headless basses?

I know that the look of a headless bass is a turnoff to many people. Regardless, I am considering buying one (a very expensive one). I have owned 800 billion basses in my life, but never a headless.

The claimed advantages are many (less weight, better weight distribution, no dead spots, better tuning, etc.). But to those of you that have played them extensively, are there any disadvantages with a headless bass? Anything that drove you crazy that I might be missing?

And just to be clear, the headless I'd be buying would be able to accommodate any strings. It wouldn't require double ball ends. So that wouldn't be a disadvantage.

Thanks in advance for any input.
 
I can't think of any other than the very dated look . I still use mine a lot . I did a fretless conversion on it a few months ago and use it even more now . Best of luck in your hunt .

90's Bunker PBC
wWMqEUIl.jpg
 
You look like a...guitarist playing one of those things.

They also tend to have different dead spots - the open A string is a place where some headless basses have lessened sustain. I've played a few headless instruments with that issue. That's a bad place to have a dead spot.

See,..that is the kind of thing I need to know. I never heard that headless can have common dead spots (let alone an entire dead string!). Most manufacturers claim no dead spots is one of the big advantages of headless,....but you know how manufacturer claims can be. :eyebrow:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bassic_desires
See,..that is the kind of thing I need to know. I never heard that headless can have common dead spots (let alone an entire dead string!). Most manufacturers claim no dead spots is one of the big advantages of headless,....but you know how manufacturer claims can be. :eyebrow:

They typically don't have the dead spot on the G string, but the absolute worst dead spot I ever encountered on a bass was the open A on a headless. The thing just shook violently for a fraction of a second, all that came out of the bass when you played open A was a short, atonal thud. Most aren't that bad, but it's something to look for when buying one - make sure the bass is in tune - dead spots can disappear or hide on you if you retune a bass.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jonlimo
(let alone an entire dead string!).

I believe the open A note is what was being referred to, not the entire string, but I may be wrong.

Many basses have dead spots and most players can work around them. I agree the open A is a bad place to have a dead spot. I had not heard of this specific issue with headless basses, very interesting.
 
I imagine a headless bass becomes a conversation piece at gigs. Maybe you want that, maybe you don’t.

Might depend on the kind of conversation it draws. If you’re considering a Status, people may associate it, and therefore you, with Mark King or possibly the Muse guy. If it’s a Steinberger, people will associate it, and therefore you, with the 80s. And so forth.
 
They typically don't have the dead spot on the G string, but the absolute worst dead spot I ever encountered on a bass was the open A on a headless. The thing just shook violently for a fraction of a second, all that came out of the bass when you played open A was a short, atonal thud. Most aren't that bad, but it's something to look for when buying one - make sure the bass is in tune - dead spots can disappear or hide on you if you retune a bass.

The bass I want would be custom ordered. So, unfortunately I wouldn't be able to play it first.

You put a good scare in me. I hate dead spots, and would be livid if I spend 4 grand on a bass with a dead A string.
 
I believe the open A note is what was being referred to, not the entire string, but I may be wrong.

Many basses have dead spots and most players can work around them. I agree the open A is a bad place to have a dead spot. I had not heard of this specific issue with headless basses, very interesting.
I actually read that wrong, thanks for pointing that out. I thought he was talking the whole A string. If it was just the open A, that sounds like the A string nut slot was possibly cut too low.
 
I imagine a headless bass becomes a conversation piece at gigs. Maybe you want that, maybe you don’t.

Might depend on the kind of conversation it draws. If you’re considering a Status, people may associate it, and therefore you, with Mark King or possibly the Muse guy. If it’s a Steinberger, people will associate it, and therefore you, with the 80s. And so forth.

It would be a Marusczcyk. So, I don't even think most people will know what the hell it is.:unsure:

Specs and look would be similar to this, but 32" scale with a high C, instead of the low B:

 
Last edited:
You put a good scare in me. I hate dead spots, and would be livid if I spend 4 grand on a bass with a dead A string.

You won't have that if it's carbon fiber (Steinberger, Status) You might if the neck is wood.

I've been playing a Steinberger since 1985 and it's still my #1. Because they're Kevlar and resin, my experiences are not generalizable to wood headless instruments. Those really are a completely different animal. So I'm not going to remark on those, and just stick in the realm of wood headless instruments.

Pros: No shoulder pain. No neck dive. LOTS more room on stage.
Cons specific to the Steinberger: guitar stands - not a one works. Can't play it sitting down. Show up to a blues/jazz/grunge/americana jam and you're gonna be getting stink-eye the entire night. The metalheads don't seem to care. Show up to an eighties tribute band and you've probably got the gig.
Cons for headless in general: you gotta get the adapter to use single-ball strings on it. And you want to do that. Double-ball strings are such a hassle.

OP: you're in LA, might be worth taking a drive down to San Diego and hit the Kiesel showroom. Call them first, but they always have at least a couple of headless basses in there. I have been impressed by the four or so I've tried so far. And no dead spots.

I've got a Nova Systems headless kit on the way and I'm going to chop up one of my mid-00s Corts and convert it. I'll let you all know how that works out.

ETA: So, you're getting a Maruszczyk? Yeah, I don't think they're going to let one out of the factory with dead spots. They''ve got a reputation to uphold.
 
I don't own a headless, though I get gas from some headless creations in LC.

The way the non-ball end is fixed could make stringing a pain. My understanding is that it depends on the system used. It would be unfortunate to string something slightly off and have to toss the string.
 
I've been wondering if the headless tuners will get on my nerves. Mark King makes them look easy,....but he probably makes most things bass related look easy.

i really like being able to tune with my right hand (i am right-handed.) however, those little clip-on tuners that i like so much are tough to use on a headless. i've attached them to a volume knob before and tuned that way...
 
  • Like
Reactions: N. Kentucky Bass
I don't own a headless, though I get gas from some headless creations in LC.

The way the non-ball end is fixed could make stringing a pain. My understanding is that it depends on the system used. It would be unfortunate to string something slightly off and have to toss the string.

good point. the clamp systems i have had were definitely not tapewound or flatwound friendly.