I have a Kiesel VB5 and it feels awkward to fret the lower notes (the ones closer to the non-existent headstock).
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Does the bridge/clamp on that Marusczcyk look like it would struggle with flats/tapewounds? Because I would be using flats/tapewounds exclusively on this bass. That would be an issue for me.good point. the clamp systems i have had were definitely not tapewound or flatwound friendly.
bridge end is fine. that part pulls on the 'ball' end. the clamp end is usually at the nut. the blunt bolts that clamp the strings can compress outer windings. it's bad for tapewounds for sure. i couldn't see the nut end clearly on the bass in the video.
edit: ask the builder about using tapes/flats and let us know what he says...
bridge end is fine. that part pulls on the 'ball' end. the clamp end is usually at the nut. the blunt bolts that clamp the strings can compress outer windings. it's bad for tapewounds for sure. i couldn't see the nut end clearly on the bass in the video.
edit: ask the builder about using tapes/flats and let us know what he says...
I've been fighting this battle with a Kiesel VB5. I tried to put LaBella tapewounds on it, and the sharp point of the anchor cut through the tape and started it unraveling. Expensive strings to ruin like that!
I'm mulling over ideas to use epoxy or something to keep the tape from unraveling, but not sure it will work (and again, it's an expensive experiment).
You can get tape wound double balls from Status.
do they have 32" scale with a high 'c'? i assume they would, but you know...
A Status Streamline was actually one of the headless basses that I first considered.
I know that the look of a headless bass is a turnoff to many people. Regardless, I am considering buying one (a very expensive one). I have owned 800 billion basses in my life, but never a headless.
The claimed advantages are many (less weight, better weight distribution, no dead spots, better tuning, etc.). But to those of you that have played them extensively, are there any disadvantages with a headless bass? Anything that drove you crazy that I might be missing?
And just to be clear, the headless I'd be buying would be able to accommodate any strings. It wouldn't require double ball ends. So that wouldn't be a disadvantage.
Thanks in advance for any input.