• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Do all cabs feel like a compromise?

Yup!

Thats what I use and everytime I play them in context (with the band), I am always just astonished with how well they work and sound. I used to feel that the amp was more important than the cabs being used but I now feel these cabs are the most important part of the sound. :woot:

Yep. Cabs are what people hear (ignoring huge stage, DI, PA situations)
 
But I like that they would be easily able to find replacement speakers should one ever blow. Something like Barefaced? Not so easy. I could definitely compromise on the tolex as long as it’s not rat fur.

Plus, I know Mesa will be quality.
I don't know if Mesa uses proprietary speakers; They may not be around forever. Look at the present situation Carvin owners are faced with.
 
Compromise never sounded so good! ;)

f112_2016_m.jpg
 
My .02. Read some of the different manufacturers club threads (Mesa Boogie Subway Series, Audiokinesis, Barefaced Bass Cab, Big E speakers etc). PM some people that seem to like the cabs closest to the configuration and voicing you're shooting for and then make a decision based on what you think will work the best for you!!

I've received a lot of good information from forum members and utilized that info to pick what I thought was the best solution for me.
 
My definition of ideal is an 8 ohm cab that I can double up on larger gigs and use singly on smaller gigs. Sub 45lbs per cab (using the single weight plate standard), truck bed liner, handles 400-500W, quality construction, real handles - not the silly straps. Tone and low end extension, of course.

The Barefaced Super Midget fits this description. 23 pounds. Takes tons of power as I routinely used an ICE 1000 amp @ 525watts into this 8ohm cab. I've used one for a year. Perfect cab. Gigged two of the larger Big Baby IIs before, have owned and gigged lots of Greenboy Fearless and fEarFul type cabs, AudioKenesis, Acme, etc etc. After years of experimentation, haven't thought twice about the SM.

Barefaced Bass - Super Midget
 
Are they called BareFace, because there's no logo?
The Barefaced Super Midget fits this description. 23 pounds. Takes tons of power as I routinely used an ICE 1000 amp @ 525watts into this 8ohm cab. I've used one for a year. Perfect cab. Gigged two of the larger Big Baby IIs before, have owned and gigged lots of Greenboy Fearless and fEarFul type cabs, AudioKenesis, Acme, etc etc. After years of experimentation, haven't thought twice about the SM.

Barefaced Bass - Super Midget

Yeah, I think Barefaced deserves to be on the short list.
 
One thing that I think seems apparent in this thread is that the notion of "compromise" is being tossed around like it's a negative attribute. The flip side of compromise is "specialization." It seems that no one cab design will be ideal across the range of possible bass-playing approaches and contexts. Clearly the OP is not after a cab designed to meet a low-ish price point, and nothing with rat fur.. With that out of the way, what performance attributes are required? Does it need a lot of high end extension? A solid low B? Are we strictly concerned with fine cabinetwork? Seems less like juggling negatives that way.
 
One thing that I think seems apparent in this thread is that the notion of "compromise" is being tossed around like it's a negative attribute. The flip side of compromise is "specialization." It seems that no one cab design will be ideal across the range of possible bass-playing approaches and contexts. Clearly the OP is not after a cab designed to meet a low-ish price point, and nothing with rat fur.. With that out of the way, what performance attributes are required? Does it need a lot of high end extension? A solid low B? Are we strictly concerned with fine cabinetwork? Seems less like juggling negatives that way.
All cabs are compromises to some extent. There are always trade-offs. Make it more capable in one aspect and you decrease its performance in another.
 
The customer is always. ... right? Heh
No, but they always have the money :D
I don't know if Mesa uses proprietary speakers; They may not be around forever. Look at the present situation Carvin owners are faced with.
Longevity of Mesa is not likely a problem.
Don't the fearless wedges stand up on the end just as well?

Last resort, buy the cab you like that can't be had with bedliner but get it naked. Strip the hardware and pay someone to bedliner it. Put the hardware back. Done.
Hehehe you said naked.
?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.giphy.com%2Fmedia%2FNX1JTULYtL19S%2Fgiphy.gif

One thing that I think seems apparent in this thread is that the notion of "compromise" is being tossed around like it's a negative attribute. The flip side of compromise is "specialization." It seems that no one cab design will be ideal across the range of possible bass-playing approaches and contexts. Clearly the OP is not after a cab designed to meet a low-ish price point, and nothing with rat fur.. With that out of the way, what performance attributes are required? Does it need a lot of high end extension? A solid low B? Are we strictly concerned with fine cabinetwork? Seems less like juggling negatives that way.
There have been some pretty high-endish costing, looking and sounding cabs dressed in rat fur (not my fav finish!).