• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Do Only Prog-Fans Like Chris Squire?

Chri


Chris Squire rules....Rush are not prog rock!!!!! Genesis jumped the prog rock shark after Trick of the Tail! Yes was the definition of progressive rock until the 90's reboot. Nothing progressive about "Owner of a lonely Heart" !
I'm sorry. I always thought of Rush, along with King Crimson and Yes as quintessential Prog-rock.
If Rush is out, maybe I am a Prog fan after all. Lol
 
In 1969 onwards, my little old band attended several gigs by such bands. Yes was one such band that I recall seeing several times.
Also - someone mentioned King Crimson. We went to that band's debut at the Marquee club in London. Also saw Genesis twice a decade apart
followed Peter Bardens' Camel for several gigs. We were a clubbing all-sorts band so we encountered a number of other bands of various genres.
Chris Squire still has his Rickenbacker and I have mine but I designed and built my stereo bass rig 40 years ago which can deal with many sounds.
Chris Squire had that twangy piano bass strings sound - that was 1969.
 
Interestingly, I wonder if Chris were in a "straight up rock band", if he'd still be the same bassist doing the same stuff? I'm thinking probably not.

You have to remember that a lot of the Yes Progressive music was written by Chris. So pretty much any band he would be in would have some of that style in it.

I just love his bass playing ... especially the early yes stuff ... Fragile is brilliant.
 
What about Supertramp? Are they Prog or Pop? Keyboard based usually equals Prog.?.?
I love me some Supertramp. The Logical Song is my jam.

Just putting keys in a band does not make them "Progressive"

Basically Prog Rock "progressed" from simple 3 minute 3 chord 1-4-5 songs into more complex pieces of music incorporating elements of jazz, classical orchresta, complex time signatures, and thematic lyrical content. The keyboards helped with more classical sounds.


A longer definition here >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_rock
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SunnBass
As a HUGE prog fan, prog WRITER, prog PLAYER in two PROG bands with all PROG loving/playing/devoted friends, I am eminently UNqualified to discuss Squire's appeal or lack thereof to non-prog folk. However, the discussion about what is an isn't prog compels me to reference a great quote about prog in general that has been perfectly borne out in the above thread:

prog
 
I've always liked Chris's playing,and his sound from the very beginning of his career, right up to the present, and try to emulate some of that in the decidedly nonprog bands i play in,wanting the bass to be an upfront part of the bands instrumental sound. I do like unconventional music,whether it is "prog" or whatever. Yes's latest album has some very conventional sounding pop songs,that still have pretty cool basslines underpinning them.
 
Listen again. Then listen remembering what else was going on in 1969.;)

Yeah that was my thought too,the arrangements on the debut album were pretty unusual for a rock band of that time,and really made that album stand out. And the 2nd album,Time and a word,had some absolutely killer unconventional music happening on it,with just about everything on it being over the top. (In a fantastically good way).
 
Yeah that was my thought too,the arrangements on the debut album were pretty unusual for a rock band of that time,and really made that album stand out. And the 2nd album,Time and a word,had some absolutely killer unconventional music happening on it,with just about everything on it being over the top. (In a fantastically good way).
The other thing that I think is lost is that just because other people took what Yes did and pushed it even farther doesn't mean that Yes is no longer prog rock. I think that a lot of times young people take things out of context. You have to judge things in light of the time they happened. Having said that, I think that even today much of early Yes would be considered prog rock.
 
I'm sorry. I always thought of Rush, along with King Crimson and Yes as quintessential Prog-rock.
If Rush is out, maybe I am a Prog fan after all. Lol

I'm the hugest Rush fan in the world, but I don't consider them Prog, and they don't consider themselves Prog either. They had Prog influences, surely, but they are essentially a hard rock power trio, and a very creative one.
 
I'm the hugest Rush fan in the world, but I don't consider them Prog, and they don't consider themselves Prog either. They had Prog influences, surely, but they are essentially a hard rock power trio, and a very creative one.
Certain Rush songs fall readily into the Prog category, "the camera eye" for one,2112,and pretty much all of Hemispheres. But yeah overall,i always thought they were a very inventive hard rock band.