I actually I became a fan when he was a member of UK. I heard his King Crimson work later.
Congratulations, you are a closet Prog-fan. Just don't tell your woman.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I actually I became a fan when he was a member of UK. I heard his King Crimson work later.
He can definitely rock out in a more conventional sense.Interestingly, I wonder if Chris were in a "straight up rock band", if he'd still be the same bassist doing the same stuff? I'm thinking probably not.
Other than the really early stuff, Yes and similar bands went over my head, as I thought it was pretentious as $%&%$, but he's a great player.
This statement is an opinion and not necessarily true.
Start with The Mars Volta.
There's also Orphan Project, Toe, Spock's Beard, Riverside (Poland), Pelican, Godspeed You Black Emperor.
Just to name a few.
Take a look.
See how I was helpful and not condescending?
There is nothing "prog" or "progressive" about music from 20+ years ago. Sorry.
But, your first paragraph is full of condescension...Is that what you consider progressive? I did check out most of those bands about 10-12 years ago, but none of them really sustained my interest. Most bands on that list average about 14-20 years old, so your cutoff point for what's "prog" is a little nebulous.
As an aside, if you can't see it yourself, let me advise you that you have come across in a distinctly condescending way in this thread. Doesn't mean it's intentional, but that's what it appears like from a detached observer. I offer this in the spirit of helpfulness.
Now, with that out of the way, you seem serious about your musical tastes. What is the latest thing you heard musically that really excited you? I've always got my antennae up for something good I haven't heard.
But the concept of prog as a genre is meaningless without the semantics of the word itself. Your other examples are poor analogies.We are using the term as a name of a specific style or genre of music.
Rock has nothing to do with minerals, metal has nothing to do with a specific class of elements or alloys, punk?, jazz?...? What in the hell does Christian rock have to do anything???
We are using the term as a name of a specific style or genre of music.
I respectfully disagree with that statement.But the concept of prog as a genre is meaningless without the semantics of the word itself. Your other examples are poor analogies.
But with PROGRESSIVE ROCK it most certainly did. That's the whole point of it having become a genre in the first place. The PROGRESSION of rock away from user-friendly radio schlock.I respectfully disagree with that statement.
The very point I was making is that the meaning of the word has absolutely nothing to do with the use of the word as a name for a genre of music.
I respectfully disagree with that statement.
The very point I was making is that the meaning of the word has absolutely nothing to do with the use of the word as a name for a genre of music.
What people were doing in rock music in the 1970's was infinitely more progressive and creative than anything going on now.
Anyone younger than, 40?, won't get it. Prog is prog. This other stuff, metal, Dream Theatre, Buckethead, whatever. Is not Prog. Prog was musicianship, lyrics, album art, post-psychedelia, mystery, bombast, weird band quotes. Yes were the Prog's Prog. Chris Squire is a living legend from another age.It's really weird to me that some people have come into this thread to debate what "Prog" is. Besides being a thread de-rail, it's not something that's debatable when it comes to Chris Squire or Yes. Do any google search on Squire or Yes and you will see "Prog" mentioned. Just weird tangents some people get on. I guess there's trolls anywhere you go.