I have looked at and read about double basses for some time now. I am an electric bass guitar player in ENorth West England, and I am looking to get a double bass. I have been offered a Stentor 2 bass (3/4 size) which is all of solid/carved wood rather than laminated. It has been restrung with decent strings, the nut has been trimmed as it was high and the bridge cut and then fitted with a pair of adjustable thumbwheels on posts in the centre of the bridge so you can adjust the action easily and quickly.
It plays well (to my ears) and comes with a bow, the original "Arco" strings as spares and a gig bag/soft case. All this for £500 from the music shop.
It is a "new" bass, but the guy buys them cheaply from his supplier if they are marked/damaged and sets up modifies/tweaks them as above to sell on. The down side is that it has a split at the bottom of the back about 9" long which has been glued up he pointed this out to me and told me that this is what he does so, he says, you get a bass which would be nearer £1000which is already set up and improved for half price because of the splits/marks which do not detract from the tone.
I know that basses/cellos etc DO get splits/marks on them - as with guitars and at least then you can say "It came like that - I didn't do it." Fender guitars, of course, do their "Custom Shop" range where they pre age new guitars and put wear and tear marks on them before you buy!
I saw a 4/4 orchestral bass in Manchester (Johnny Roadhouse's shop) which was an really old piece and hugely expensive. It sounded great and had a MASSIVE sound, but looked like a train wreck - it had had many splits, knocks and repairs over the years.
My question is :- Does this sound like a good buy to you guys, and do you see the split as a problem? - as I say it has been glued and no attempt has been made to refinish it or varnish over it.
I know that this is cheap in the grand scheme of things, but it is a lot of cash to me.
Thank for any and all input.