In the 90’s, we had a manager that took everything that the OP is doing and divided it up between the band members. What a joke. Miss those days though.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I get what you're saying Will, however, the manager isn't going to take on any of our current "stuff". So no relief of duties has no value, I guess. The manager would have to do other stuff to create value, and that was the list of stuff I was after. I see now, through this discussion, and others I've had, that there are a few things a manager could do for us that our current team couldn't or wouldn't handle. Those things seem pretty small at this point, and appear to be more trouble than they are worth. No role that we've discussed here seems to add enough value that this person should make as much as everyone else in the band, though, that's for sure.
Me too man, it sucks. No manager we've found is offering to do any of that, unfortunately. They just do "brand building" and TV appearances I guess. Our booking agent handles our shows and tours, so at least we don't deal with that anymore, and that's the lions share of the "extra" work. Also, I cant imagine anyone outside the band controlling our money, but the rest of it I would gladly give up.my underground metal band has no manager, and I do all the stuff that you are doing, and it sucks. I would much rather have someone take 20% - 30% if they could do it all for me! Then all I would have to do is write songs and make records. I don't want to book shows/tours/flights/hotels/merch/gear/money.
We are a corporation in fact. All contracts are with the organization and not the individual members.If it hasn't already been mentioned.....
The reason labels and venues want a manager is because of Power of Attorney. They are a single representative for the band as a group. Otherwise they would have to get an agreement from all members on everything and if some agree and some don't they have no recourse if something happens later.
If you are a "band" you need a formal declaration of that. It's just like having a business.
Thank you. Yeah, the management companies and booking agencies are two different entities in our situation. The type of management we are discussing will not book shows or tours. They may throw some weight around to help us get certain event or tour, but as I mentioned before, it's not an issue for use because we don't tour in the traditional sense, and our booking agent is really very capable of getting us involved in those things that interest us. Unless the manager himself had a law degree and were a practicing bar certified attorney, I would still hire a lawyer to review any contract. We don't employ the lawyer full time, just on the rare occasion that legal matters need to be addressed, and its done on a one time fee basis.You sure? You keep saying the manager won't relieve any of the duties, but pretty sure multiple were listed earlier in the thread. Booking/negotiations/logistics? Aren't those tasks you are now relieved of? I'm confused.
Edit: i see now you have booking agent/lawyer covering these things. You really need to do a full cost/benefit analysis on multiple scenarios to make the final decision. For instance could a manager cover the tasks you are hiring two people to do for less, etc.
Our booking agent handles our shows and tours, so at least we don't deal with that anymore, and that's the lions share of the "extra" work.