• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Do we need a Manager?

Okay guys. I'm seeking some opinions/information/pros-and-cons from those of you who have had a band manager. This is a long one, I apologize in advance.

Recently, my band has been in talks with a couple medium sized labels about a record deal. In two of those conversations, the AR guy from each of these two labels thought our band should have a manager. One believed it was a must, the other thought it was a good idea. Neither are saying that having manager is part of the record deal, just came up in the discussion about the bands future. One of my band-mates is now insisting that we need a manager going forward; the others are on the fence or don't care.

My question to them is: whats not getting done?

Here is the setup. Myself and one of our guitar players "co-manage" the band business at this point.
I handle merchandise: procuring art, hiring printers, inventory, ordering, shipping, etc. I also handle the finances. This essentially means that I stop them from spending too much, pay the practice space rent, make sure we're getting paid from our gigs, making sure we can and do pay our bills, I organize our financials for taxes\coordinate with the accountant, pay the taxes, etc. I'm in charge of all things van and trailer related including insurance, maintenance, and repairs (some of which I do myself). I'm the contact person for our booking agent too so I coordinate show/tour offers and ideas with the band and then talk it out with him. If we're flying into a show, I also coordinate back-line when necessary. Lastly, I usually plan our tours (not book them). I figure out distances, mileage, destinations in between venues if have days off, coordinate hotels or crash spots, how much gas/food/lodging will cost, and even plan where we will get our oil changes (I'm a big spread sheet guy).

The other guy handles social media. He does much of our graphic work too, mostly for merchandise mock-ups, so he can put them on our socials. He is generally good at hunting deals on the inter-webs so I've happily handed off the duty of booking hotels, cars, and flights to him. He typically advances our shows and tends to be the contact person for venues\promoters\stage managers when were on the road or even doing a local show. He also is the contact person for any endorsements we may have as well as the go-to for a couple of the labels we are talking to. Oh, though we all do some interview stuff, he does the lions share and writes most out most of the responses to written interviews. Along those lines, he's our resident extrovert too. He's happy to schmooze and talk and have drinks with whoever :) Its actually very valuable to have in our band, the rest of us actively dislike schmoozing.

We have a booking agent. He works for a pretty big firm and they have a large roster. We signed up with this agent and his firm knowing we'd be the little fish in a big pond but thought it was a worthy sacrifice to be associated with their roster. The thought being if they were looking for a tour partner for one of their bands, they'd look internally when possible. Its worked out fine so far.

The other guys in the band don't do anything unless they are asked.

I should add two more things:
We play metal, and not like radio friendly or mainstream metal like korn or avenged seven fold. Underground metal, I guess is the best way to describe it. The point is, we're not going to get TV appearances, or sell our songs to commercials or TV shows. Maybe a video game if we're lucky.
We aren't really a touring band. We can dedicate 4ish weeks a year to a van tour, and the rest of the time we can dedicate about 1 weekend a month to one-off events like festivals or whatever. We get tour offers on occasion and rarely accept them, not that they haven't been great\cool\exciting, just the timing or the duration haven't worked for our collective schedules. We're professionals with more or less serious careers, and most of us have families (or at least a spouse). So more tour offers or better positioning on on a tour, isn't a thing that we need.

To summarize, I really feel like we have most of the bases covered and I just dont believe a manager would take any of our current responsibilities off our plates? And, If they aren't going to do any of the stuff we currently do, and they aren't going to get us shows (our agent does that), what is it exactly that they will do?

Other more specific questions:
1. I have heard a manager takes 15-20% of all bands earnings. I have also heard they only take 15-20% of revenue they bring in? Big difference.

2. Are contracts usually involved and if so, how long?

Again, sorry for the long post, just thought there would be a couple folks here interested on the topic and, more importantly, possess helpful insight/experience?
 
I'll speak from my own experiences, seems like my old band had a similar division of labor (I was the business guy and tour manager, guitar player was the creative director, other two guys didn't do anything unless asked).

We sought a manager to help us find a label and a booking agent, and then the manager handled coordinating everything with them. The manager was good for setting up licensing deals, finding private and corporate gigs, getting quotes for general liability insurance, and being an impartial voice in whatever problems and drama arose within the band. Our manager was also an entertainment attorney who could handle any of our legal needs (contracts, drug busts, incorporation, etc.), and had his interns do our social media gruntwork.

We had no formal agreement with the manager, and his take was: 0% of gigs under $500, 10% of gigs between $500-1000, 15% of anything over $1000. He took a cut on licensing, but not of our personal publishing and writing royalties.
 
It sounds like you have a great approach already. If a label is offering something good that you can’t already do yourselves, it might be worth considering a manager to make this happen - but *only* if it’s going to advance the situation with the label in your favour. Otherwise i’d stick to your guns.

My (pretty underground) metal band had a manager for a while. I wasn’t keen on the idea but the others were. He got us a few good gigs but otherwise nothing much changed.

My general view is: if you’re playing uncommercial music, a capable DIY setup is the best approach. Good luck, anyway!
 
I'll speak from my own experiences, seems like my old band had a similar division of labor (I was the business guy and tour manager, guitar player was the creative director, other two guys didn't do anything unless asked).

We sought a manager to help us find a label and a booking agent, and then the manager handled coordinating everything with them. The manager was good for setting up licensing deals, finding private and corporate gigs, getting quotes for general liability insurance, and being an impartial voice in whatever problems and drama arose within the band. Our manager was also an entertainment attorney who could handle any of our legal needs (contracts, drug busts, incorporation, etc.), and had his interns do our social media gruntwork.

We had no formal agreement with the manager, and his take was: 0% of gigs under $500, 10% of gigs between $500-1000, 15% of anything over $1000. He took a cut on licensing, but not of our personal publishing and writing royalties.
That is the best response I could have asked for. Thanks for sharing your very relevant experience!
 
  • Like
Reactions: getbent
That is the best response I could have asked for. Thanks for sharing your very relevant experience!
Thanks guys. I didn't mention that we have an attorney. I guess I forgot because we only use him on a as needed basis, which is not often thankfully. Great guy we trust and works almost exclusively with bands and in the industry. He's in on all contracts.
 
I do agree you all seem to be doing well without one by the sounds of it. To me it really just becomes, do you want to pay someone else to alleviate the work you are doing? Or do you enjoy doing it and want to keep the duties? Same questions go to your managing partner.

For instance if i put myself in your shoes, i would think i might get burned out on all that logistical work. Could do it for awhile, but at some point would want to "upgrade" to having someone handle it all for me. Of course we are all different, you may really feed off it.
 
Why did the labels think you need a manager? Do they think it will help grow your brand? Do they think you are not doing enough in that area?
I guess? But both labels work exclusively with metal bands, so I dont know how much brand growing they could expect. One said that they could help us get all these opportunities on touring packages, but like I said, that's not an issue for us, we have a great agent who works for the right agency, and we get more offers than we care to turn down as it is ;) Both labels are going to make offers for the record contract regardless of whether or not a manager is in place... and we don't need a manager to negotiate the terms or solicit offers. We have a terrific lawyer and we've been through the record contract stuff before. (i wrote construction contracts as part of my job for 6 years or so, so I'm no stranger to legalese.)
 
Last edited:
I guess? But both labels work exclusively with metal bands, so I dont know how much brand growing the could expect. One said that they could help us get all these opportunities on touring packages, but like I said, thats not an issue for us, we have a great agent who works for the right agency, and we get more offers than we care to turn down as it is ;) Both labels are going to make offers for the record contract regardless of whether or not a manager is in place... and we don't need a manager to negotiate the terms or solicit offers. We have a terrific lawyer and we've been through the record contract stuff before. (i wrote construction contracts as part of my job for 6 years or so, so I'm no stranger to legalese.)

They've probably dealt with too many bands that didn't know what they were doing. You certainly sound like you have the bases covered.
 
At this point it doesn't sound like you need a manager, the only question is, how long will it take until you (and/or the other guy) get tired of doing all that extra work that is not music related?
If you think that will not happen because you love all that then I don't think you need a manger. But if you can see the benefit ofleaving all that to someone else and use the time for soemthing else... well, I think you need to talk with the band and seriously think about it
 
  • Like
Reactions: Slough Feg Bass
At this point it doesn't sound like you need a manager, the only question is, how long will it take until you (and/or the other guy) get tired of doing all that extra work that is not music related?
If you think that will not happen because you love all that then I don't think you need a manger. But if you can see the benefit ofleaving all that to someone else and use the time for soemthing else... well, I think you need to talk with the band and seriously think about it
I agree. The day to day stuff we are doing is actually time consuming and stopped being fun awhile ago, but no band manager job description I've seen to date would relieve us of any of our duties with respect to merchandise and social media. Big bands often pay someone to manage socials and tour managers/merch people often handle merch on tour. I don't think a band manager is going to take on either of those duties, which means they will provide us no relief, and will have to find their value by creating work for themselves.
 
Last edited:
In an original metal bands, you are either all in, or weekend warrior. Nothing wrong with that, but I think you can manage your schedule without a manager if it’s not a career.
Well, we definitely are not weekend warriors. We make work, family, and time sacrifices that most people and musicians can't even fathom. If we don't have a manager, it doesn't mean we aren't serious about it.
 
Last edited:
The labels want one for two reasons.

First, what you’re doing is work. Once signed, they want you to concentrate on the music, your image, and promoting yourself. Anything else you’re doing takes time away from that and coukd nake you lose focus.

Second, they want a drama free single point of contact for the band. Someone who knows the biz and can buffer and act as the designated adult in the room.
 
I'll speak from my own experiences, seems like my old band had a similar division of labor (I was the business guy and tour manager, guitar player was the creative director, other two guys didn't do anything unless asked).

We sought a manager to help us find a label and a booking agent, and then the manager handled coordinating everything with them. The manager was good for setting up licensing deals, finding private and corporate gigs, getting quotes for general liability insurance, and being an impartial voice in whatever problems and drama arose within the band. Our manager was also an entertainment attorney who could handle any of our legal needs (contracts, drug busts, incorporation, etc.), and had his interns do our social media gruntwork.

We had no formal agreement with the manager, and his take was: 0% of gigs under $500, 10% of gigs between $500-1000, 15% of anything over $1000. He took a cut on licensing, but not of our personal publishing and writing royalties.

That's not a bad deal.

We had a guy wanting to be our manager... until we noticed he wanted 20% from all gigs, including the ones WE had secured and were ongoing (in other words, those future gigs that simply came to us because we had worked hard to get them)... I laughed. Hard. The band was young and a couple of the guys were impressed to have a 'manager' and sign contracts etc, without looking at them.
Of course, we continued without him. Last I heard, he was some kind of paranormal medium. You can't make this up.
 
It really sounds like you guys don't NEED a manager.
You've already got an accountant and a booking agent you seem happy with, which pretty much covers anything a manager would be doing for you anyway.

It's a pity the other band guys don't contribute more ... even doing, say the van maintenance.

Out of curiosity, you say one of the others now thinks you need a manager...what does he see needs covering that you already aren't doing?
Is he one of these guys that just assume everything just happens and doesn't realise how valuable you are?
 
  • Like
Reactions: JRA
It really sounds like you guys don't NEED a manager.
You've already got an accountant and a booking agent you seem happy with, which pretty much covers anything a manager would be doing for you anyway.

It's a pity the other band guys don't contribute more ... even doing, say the van maintenance.

Out of curiosity, you say one of the others now thinks you need a manager...what does he see needs covering that you already aren't doing?
Is he one of these guys that just assume everything just happens and doesn't realise how valuable you are?

Yep.

Some people make things happen.
Some people watch things happen.
Some people ask: “What happened?”
 
There are actually two questions. Do you need a manager and can you get a manager? I would imagine that good managers are hard to find and very picky about who they represent. Are bringing in so much money that a 15% or 20% cut would be worth someone's time?
 
  • Like
Reactions: JRA