Hi,
With a bass... can anyone honestly hear a sonic difference between an Adler & Basswood body? At bass frequencies, does the body wood actually make a noticeable difference? I'm suggesting no.
I do think mahogany sounds different. I do think maple/rosewood sounds different than maple/maple.
What about bridges... one high mass versus another... if equally balanced and weighted... which tech is a difference maker?
Tuners, as long as they stay in tune right?
How about the nut. Does nut material create a noticeable sonic difference?
So, my fancy Fender... it so nice I'm careful every time I touch it. Kinda not fun... my Epiphone Les Paul is not as concerning but I'm mindful. Squier, although appreciated. I'm never careful and its available for anyone to handle. My question becomes does having a higher quality bass actually add to my playing or limit it? IDK.
What have you decided? If you play a $2k bass... how carefree with it are you? If you play an entry bass what bothers you most about it if anything?
I'd wager that when you take two basses that are identical in every way, excepting one of the mentioned factors,
the difference will be barely noticeable in ideal testing circumstances.
I'd also wager that when you take two basses that are built with the same blueprint but one of them has the cheapest available materials (provided they are not too cheap to do their job) and the other one has all the bells & whistles, only top notch, there will be a difference audible even in normal circumstances. All the tiny little things add up to a bigger thing in this scenario.
That said, I'd like to argue for a factor that has the biggest impact on me personally: Inspiration.
Sometimes, when I pick up a bass, something in that bass inspires me to play certain things a certain way.
This can be the shape of the neck, the string spacing, a better response to a certain frequency, the string height or even something bad like a dead spot on the neck.
Something suddenly gets easier or harder than one is used to, or something becomes more audible or less audible in the mix, which triggers a response in the style of playing.
I basically can gig with any instrument that is reliable enough to do so.
As long as it stays in tune, has a proper setup (intonation, string height, neck bow) and the electronics won't fail, I can make it work on stage. But. That says nothing about how much I enjoy playing that particular instrument.
I do own a luthier made custom bass, where about 90% of the work was done omitting powertools. Handwound pickups, top notch electronics, boutique woods, you name it. I also own a US made Carvin that cost me two grand back in '96. And an Ibanez that was half of that. Apart from tiny details all these work more or less the same, but each of these basses did trigger some inspiration when I picked them up for the first time.
I'd say once you cross the threshold that separates the junk from the decent instruments, every additional buck you spend is for you. Sometimes, through inspiration or maybe even placebo effect, this will result in better playing. Sometimes not.