• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Does anyone only play their P PUP on their PJ?

I typically have my P up all the way then adjust my J until I like the tone (separate volume for both). I usually do this on all my basses, the neck pickup on full then add bridge until I like the sound. I should mention that I play Spectors almost exclusively and the have an active tone circuit. The one exception is my Fender USA Deluxe Jazz fretless. I do the same thing, but unlike most Fenders, it has an active tone circuit.
I believe your J PUP is a Noiseless, so it's built like and acts like a Humbucker.
 
I owned a P-J as well and mostly use the P PUP to get that deep thumping tone.

But sometimes that deep thumping tone got drown in the mix because it tends to be muddy. That's when I turn my J pickup on and dial some tone. The added grit of J PUP & tone cuts through the mix well. Slapping also sounds nicer because the added treble for that popping sound.

Lastly, when I need full grit and that Jaco tone, I can always dial in J PUP and play near the bridge. I guess having a P-J is still better for that versatility alone. I have been trying to find reason not to have the J PUP and get a pure P-bass but I can't find any.
 
I've got P-J with 3 way toggle and I can't imagine ever using the center position (both pickups full) but another P-J with VVT I like the J on full with just a little P and I like the P on full with just a little J.

And then I've got a third P-J where I wired the P and J together series with a blend - and that combination is something else entirely - I like every sound possible with the blend including both pickups on full. For some reason when they are combined in series it has a very different sound with both pickups full.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HiEnd Basses
Yes, because the J pup is noisy in comparison.
In retrospect, I should have just bought a plain old P-bass.

This. I think this configuration resulted from guys liking to solo the J bridge AND having the P for the majority of other stuff.
After reading an interview with the Ox re: the Warwick Buzzard bass and his choice of double P pickups (because they're humcancelling), I started searching for a double P that wasn't a BC Rich or the Buzzard. I finally go it from SX in the Hadean.
OTOH, DiMarzio makes a few humcancelling J pickups in various flavors. I tried a pair in a J copy and they were good, not as nice as P's, but better than stock thin noisy J's. I wish I had wires them with a parallel/series switch. So if you have a PJ, I recommend dropping a humcancelling J in and see how that grabs you.
 
Yes, because the J pup is noisy in comparison.
In retrospect, I should have just bought a plain old P-bass.
I recently bought an Am. Elite Precision whic is a PJ bass.
The J pickup is not noisy but, in effect, it doesn't end a lot of colour to the tone of a P bass; it tends to make it more similar to the tone of a J bass with more focus on the low-end.
I prefer to turn the pickups balance tone 1/4 towards the soloed P pickup position.
In this way I, at least, can get a P sound with some more defined mids and thinner highs which I like.
When it comes to rock, however, it's very easy and natural to turn the J pickup fully off and the bass behaves like a good P bass honestly (at list IMO), better, for instance, of the MIJ PB70 with EMG GZR pickup I acquired some time ago (always IMO of course).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Killed_by_Death
I have a PJ and I definitely go P only for the rough stuff. OTOH, I have this P+MM in which I can tap any coil as single or both in series and normally I go MM's front coil + P (with balance more towards the MM) for a sound that can compete in authority with the P. This results in a single coil MM meets P sound. If I mix the back coil of the MM pickup instead, despite sounding really nice (in a '70s J mood) it's thin in comparison. For me P (or even better, reverse P) + MM (with a coil splitting switch) is THE most versatile "signature tones" configuration there is.

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: lowdownthump
I actually swing both ways. But my fretless PJ seemed to always be P only. Both PUs has that scooped thing that works, too. I guess that could be a tone for you that falls short. I can get that. For some reason I never warmed to the bridge PU. Although I know many that swear by them.
 
Well I put a STK-J2 in my PJ bass and I love the overall tones I get....90% of the time I use both pu's and 10% of the time I go P only...it always depends on the song being played and sometimes the tones my guitarist uses also.