Now, if I preferred thuddy, buzzy, or twangy basses, and a good set up and reliability weren't important to me, then I guess the extra dough wouldn't be worth it.
Is this assuming every bass would be "thuddy, buzzy or twangy" and isn't capable of maintaining a good set-up without the influx of extra dough? Personally, I think not.
I used to work at a dealership. I advised my bass customers to play a lot of basses. Find the one that feels the best. To a certain extent the elwctronics can be swapped to totally transform the sound of most any bass. So find the one thay feels like an old baseball glove or a good worn in pair of shoes. Buy it and make it soind lime you want it to.
I love this sentiment. If it doesn't feel "good" in your hands, what's the point? No matter how ridonkulous the price tag of a top-of-the-line Gibson Thunderbird or Rickenbacker is, they'll never feel good in my hands. But this brings me to my personal point on the subject…
In my particular case, there are certain points of ergonomics that I prefer. (I'm sure some of you here have heard me rattle/prattle on about how I dig a curvier, vintage-style fretboard radius) While I can comfortably play a current, Fender-standard radius board, to get the kind I favor, I have to spend a bit more. Not a huge amount (the most I've ever paid for a bass is a little over $500 USD), but it's still a considerable amount, especially for a hobbyist like me to justify. However, the ease and comfort I feel playing these particular models (Aerodynes, MIM Classic '70s) is worth the extra bucks. The fact that they are very well put-together and look/sound awesome makes it all the more worthwhile.
So in my personal experience, a few extra bucks is worth the stretch, especially if it's the only way to get something that feels right in my hands. Looking absolutely kick-ass helps a great deal, too!


Sonically speaking? That can be modified in all manner of ways.