• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Dream Bass Let-Down

I like the sound I'm getting, but not as much as my P-bass or Rick.
There are a bunch of controls and they tend to be atypical compare to fenders. Maybe hit up the Alembic club here for advice? It may also depend on the type of stuff you play with it. I recently got a Ken Smith which sounds amazing in the funk and blues bands I play in. It doesn't really fit for harder rock stuff though so I'll bring my G&L or Warwick in those situations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GHOST AT
This just happened to me. As a lifelong player now in my late 30s, I always wanted two basses: An American Standard Precision and a 4003s Rickenbacker in matte black.

I finally bought the Ric this year and was so heartbroken when I couldn't bond with it after 30 days. I traded it in for an American Professional Precision. I didn't bond with that either. Now I'm back to my Korean made Reverend Wattplower, which is back to being my number one. Unexpected for sure. It happens.

I learned that I have to stop thinking about what is supposed to be the best and just use my ears and hands and see what feels like an extension of myself and inspires me to play and write music. The Wattplower is that for me. I bought it on a whim as a kickaround bass but now I am considering getting another for the practice space. But who knows if the second one I pick up will have the same mojo or not. Guitars and basses are like individual people with souls. They deserve to be played and loved and bonded with. Sometimes the chemistry just isn't there.
 
It happens. I was always more comfortable with a Ric than a Fender. That said, I bought my first Alembic in '92 and it's been my number 1 since. I now have several, but rely on my first most often to this day.

Alembics are highly customizable. If you didn't order it the bass may have atypical features. I prefer wide string spacing, particularly at the nut, and all of mine share this feature. I favor six string basses, so the wide spacing at the nut may not work for everyone.

The bridge on many Alembics, particularly those with an Omega cut, is further from the end pin than many basses. This makes the first fret seem like a bit of a stretch on some models. I favor Elan and Europa body styles, which are a bit more traditional; these two body styles also balance quite well. (The bridge and nut on an Alembic is an engineering work of art allowing for easy and highly precise setup.)

Alembics aren't for everyone...no bass is. There may be something else out there better suited to you. I knew I had found my soulmate the moment I strapped my Alembic on. There may be one like that for you. Happy hunting!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mobeme23 and Jsn
My first bass letdown was a Lakland 55-94. What led me to this bass was the versatility of the electronics. I liked the ldea of getting tones similar to a P, Jazz and Stingray all in one bass. I bought a Skyline first and if I bonded with it a USA in the future. I didn't like the way the bass balanced and the 35 scale. After the 2nd set I felt like I was fighting the bass not playing it. That said I think the 55-94s are great basses very well made and the Skyline series are a steal, they are just not right for me.
 
Absolutely. For me it has usually come down to string spacing. I tried two different Alembics, one four and one five string and both were just way too narrow for me. I know you can get them at 18 or 19mm spacing but I bought them used with their 'normal' narrow spacing. My vintage Hofner was narrow as well but I was able to cope with it. I also tried Warwick Thumbs and a Series II and they were too narrow for me as well. Every so often I have found an instrument that's acoustically dead. In other cases I just couldn't vibe with the electronics (EMG P/Js in a Fodera Emperor) or sometimes it was the woods (heavily lacquered maple FB on a Precision).
Spacing is key for me as well. I'm 6 foot 5 tall, or 196 cm, with huge hands. Anything less than 19 mm feels cramped for me. I'm willing to compromise to 18 if the tone is great, but 19 is optimal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brad Maestas
Yep! Many times, actually. I'm fairly new to the game and didn't really know what I wanted, or which sound was "my sound". I bought what I thought was my dream bass, and wound up really disliking it for many reasons. Weight and neck profile being to two deciding factors in my selling it. I wound up trading it, actually. Got a couple of very nice basses out of it and used those to commence trading for any and everything I could get my hands on in order to find the right one. Nothing seemed to really fit. It was a classic case of Goldy Locks for me. Oddly enough, I wound up swapping a buddy an amp for the 'Ray in my profile pic and fell head over heals in love with it. I'm all gas'd out now and don't really play the other basses in my quiver, outside of a sense of obligation. My MIM pbass is 2nd in command and is a very close 2nd. No harm, no foul. You tried it, didn't find it was your taste, and someone else will surely be very happy with such a beautiful instrument in their life!
 
...my first- an'89 Elan plus 6 string/ Macassar ebony top pieces that I purchased new in 1990 from Chuck Levin's music for $1800.00.
My first Alembic was acquired from a now defunct music shop that an old friend had for a very long time. He was having health issues so his brother was running the shop in the early '90s when I got my '87 Persuader (Vector body - flame maple top with P/J pickups) for $600 with OHSC. In '96 I found my '84 Exploiter (flame koa top and OHSC) at another local shop for $1000.

Over the years I modded both basses with VPF+Q Switch, and added a second output jack that I ran "phantom" power into from a PS unit I built (a TBer now has that PSU that he uses with his ZON bass). I had the Exploiter defretted, and added Sperzel tuning keys to the Persuader. In the end, I realized that there were tuning stability issues with both Alembics (neck issues?) so I traded them both to GC for my first ZON (of three over the years). GC gave me what I had into the basses so I made out okay on that deal (back when GC was still a good place to do business with).
 
  • Like
Reactions: D.A.R.K.
To the OP:
I had one much earlier in my life and didn't connect either. It was just to sterile sounding for my tastes. It didn't have that resonance that I craved out of my Jazz and P bass. I also had a 72' Rick that I actually kinda miss. I have owned many high end basses, and really, none of them have been my cup of tea. Guess I'm just too old school. lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: woodyng2
C0C3983B-C09B-4ECD-A844-2F51C4EC1EA0.jpeg
Late '80's early '90's was a golden era for inexpensive, high quality basses.
I agree. This is a bass i dreamed about, off and on for 40 years,and recently the stars aligned for me to get one. (Veillette-Citron).
I am not disappointed in the least, love everything about it.
I have had disappointment issues with Alembic, and Ken Smith basses in the past. Fabulous,but just not right for me ergonomically. (And my favorite basses are Rickenbacker 4004 models.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: D.A.R.K.
(First-off I want to state that this has nothing to do with the instrument. It's strictly a personal "feeling".)

Ever since I was a kid seeing pictures of Jones or Entwistle with their Alembics, I considered their basses the absolute tops. Then when they came out with the Distillate, I'd thought that would be the perfect dream bass. They seemed smaller and simpler. I remember my brother bringing the new guitar player mags home with the ads in there and just drooling over them. Unfortunately, the local guitar shops have always been pretty lacking in quality inventory and I'd never been able to actually try one out. Fast-forward 35 years and I finally had the opportunity to take the plunge. The one with the right wood, scale and nut width came up at a time I actually could afford to buy it. It looks, plays and sounds really good ... But ... It doesn't do a thing for me. I've been a Fender and Rickenbacker guy all my life and this just feels too different. I've been playing it every day for a month and I just can't get used to it. I've really tried, but I'm coming to the realization that it's probably just not for me.
Has anyone else gone through something like this?

View attachment 3451363

I always think back to around 1977. Nearly every concert I saw that year had a bassist playing an Alembic. Larry Graham, Marvin Isley, I think Cordell Mosson (Parliament,) had Alembics. I don’t think anyone kept using one more than a year. My guess is that they were all used to their Fenders and Rickenbackers. For many of these players, Music Man was a better fit when they went active. That is also why active Jazz boutiques are so popular too.
 
To the OP:
I had one much earlier in my life and didn't connect either. It was just to sterile sounding for my tastes. It didn't have that resonance that I craved out of my Jazz and P bass. I also had a 72' Rick that I actually kinda miss. I have owned many high end basses, and really, none of them have been my cup of tea. Guess I'm just too old school. lol

There's something about that flavor a P-bass has that just seems right. Through the years, no matter what brand/model bass I was playing, I was always trying to make it sound like a P-bass without knowing that's what I was doing.

This Distillate sounds really good. It's set-up right and I've got all the electronics worked out. It has multiple sounds that I like, but it doesn't feel alive to me and I'm not comfortable with the ergo's. There's no inspiration when I pick it up like my old slab-board.
 
I had the opposite experience. I was a die-hard Fender player until I acquired an Alembic Essence as part of a trade. I was maybe vaguely aware of Alembic as a company, and couldn’t tell you what their models looked like.

It was a revelation. Far from being heavy and ponderous, the Essence is lightweight, sleek and built for speed, while still retaining that top-notch craftsmanship I now realize is an Alembic hallmark. Couldn’t put it down, and it opened new vistas in my playing.

The thing to keep in mind about Alembics is this: they’re very, very player-centric. That means loads of custom choices, which produces a number of idiosyncratic instruments with features that, in the hands of later players, can feel like quirks. But that brass nut? It’s adjustable. That brass bridge? It’s hand-cast in the exact same radius as the fingerboard, so no special gauges needed. Far from being fiddly and in need of expert tuning, I find it designed for user setups and on-the-fly optimization.

Yeah, there are Alembics that probably require a wheeled cart, with more switches than a lunar command module. Mine has three knobs. It weighs eight and a half pounds.

The tone? It strikes me not as cold, but pure. I can color it however I want in the signal chain, because what emerges from the instrument is consistent and clean. I can see how that takes some getting used to, but for me it was like moving from a spinet to a grand piano.

All in all, a surprise bonding—like I said, I was completely unfamiliar with the company, so no preconceptions. Every instrument is worth approaching with open ears and open minds.
Same experience with my 91 Essence. It is truly a fantastic instrument. Nothing else feels, plays, or sounds better to me. YMMV
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jsn
I wanted a USA Stingray Classic for a few years and finally found a USA SUB Stingray for a decent price. Brought it home and played it but it never sat right with me. It could have been the painted neck, or the string spacing or both. After playing P’s for years I’ve just gotten used to them. Aesthetically, the Stingray is great. Tone wise, also great. For me, playability, not so great. Maybe I need to try one with a SLO neck, idk.