• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Drummer rant regarding attention to details

Hi.

First I want to say the drummer I play with is an awesome drummer with excellent timing and technique, who's very easy to play with, but also a very busy musician these days. Gigs every weekend, and band rehearsals or studio sessions every other day of the weeks. No regular once-a-week rehearsals. He's becoming a professional drummer, and is now 20 years old and playing with the best cats in town already. Well anyway...

On our band practice yesterday for a wedding gig incoming saturday, I noticed that he don't care much about any details (riffs, breaks etc) in the music. The guitarist, who is an awesome one, had nailed all the riffs in all new songs, which wasn't an easy or small thing to learn, but the drummer obviously didn't care about any details at all in the songs. He laid down the main beats well, but didn't really care of any details apart from the beats. We discussed it a little and he's of the opinion that it really isn't very important and the audience wouldn't notice anyway if you're not playing those details, e.g. breaks or certain fills or riffs.

The guitarist said he had a lot to do to in practicing the songs and he though it wouldn't be such a big thing for the drummer to learn a break or two. The drummer was however of a different opinion and said he can't really compare it, he needs to look at it in his perspective. I'm with the guitarist here. The drummer is busy, but so is the guitarist (who by the way also have two young kids at home)...

To me it seemed like the drummer had just taken a quick listen to the each song to catch the main beat. I don't think he even listened to the whole songs for any fills or so. One of the songs we played was "Just the way you are" by Billy Joel, and there was a small break in the bridge that he just didn't want to play. I spent half an hour with that song to pick out and write down all chords to it, even though I don't even play the chords on my bass. I just took it as my responsibility to make the lead sheets that everyone is following. My guess is that the drummer spent maximum one minute with that particular song.

If you're a stand-in for a gig, I'd accept this kind of attitude (citing his own words: "if you need to learn 30 songs you don't have time to catch more than the most important stuff"), but this time we had only 5 songs or so to practice for this rehearsal. I just don't "get" his attitude in this case. Do you? Do the details matter to you? Sure you can make a song work with only the main beat and nothing more, but I think the details often are what makes the songs interesting to play and listen to. What do you think?

Sorry for the long post..
 
I'm of the mind that its the rhythm section of a cover band at a wedding and that nobody but the band and other drummers who specifically listen to the drums will even consciously notice him and even those few people that do notice him probably don't know the drum line to a Billy Joel ballad well enough to say "hey he skipped that fill!"

He's a busy guy obviously, if he plays in time and shows up what more can you ask from him, especially on a Billy Joel cover?

Also don't think I'm bashing Billy, I have a few of his albums, I just don't think of it as particularly instrumentally showcasing music.
 
Actually we agreed on keeping this as a "simple" but hard-grooving band with just a few rehearsals now and then, prior to the gigs we might get. He's not really "my" drummer, we're just four friends who enjoy playing together and everyone is at least semi-pro. Our last gig with this setting was in April, and it was one of the best gigs I've ever played. We rehearsed three times prior to that gig and we succeeded just and just to get the 35-40 songs to work then. This time the pressure was not so high to learn new songs but it still seemed like too much for him. Maybe he just had a bad day, I don't know...

In one way it's "my" band though, because I put it together for the gig in April (i.e. I didn't have a steady band when I booked that gig... ;)) and I'm the singer and thus the frontman. If I'm uncomfortable with a song we'll skip it.

This, and the other upcoming gigs are also pretty well-paying ones (200€/person plus travel expenses), so I think it's not too much to ask for the band members to pay some attention to the details to make the songs sound not just good but great. We have the potential for that, without doubt. (That last sentence is again the words of the guitarist...)

Thanks for the comments, keep them coming...


EDIT: It's not just about this Billy Joel cover, it's just about any song. Sure a big part of the audience wouldn't notice, it's about making it interesting to play and lift the music up one level. We have the potential to sound great, and I'm not happy anymore with just pulling off half-decent versions of the songs we choose to play.
 
Yes, the details matter to me. And I think they should matter to everyone. Especially to drummers. Even busy drummers... :eyebrow:

MM

Attention to detail...every detail I find very,very important.
The detail is what makes the difference between a good band and a great one and it applies not only to the music but also to the organization
I find that this goes for individual musicians as well.
 
Do I understand correctly, that the details used to matter to the drummer but they don't now? Btw, the "details" are part of the song IMHO. If they weren't, they wouldn't be on the song.

I would think this person would want to play the little details because it presents more of a challenge, and those details are fun to play, esp if it's only 5 songs.

But in the end, you have to either accept him as he is, knowing that he thinks the details don't matter, or replace him. That's how I see it.
 
Do I understand correctly, that the details used to matter to the drummer but they don't now? Btw, the "details" are part of the song IMHO. If they weren't, they wouldn't be on the song.

I would think this person would want to play the little details because it presents more of a challenge, and those details are fun to play, esp if it's only 5 songs.

But in the end, you have to either accept him as he is, knowing that he thinks the details don't matter, or replace him. That's how I see it.

To answer that first question: Not really. Last time when we had to learn 40 songs quickly to be able to play the gig, I accepted that we only outlined the songs, but to this gig with only about 5 songs to learn it shouldn't have been very difficult to check them out a bit more carefully.

I've seen this guy play some songs with an attention to detail that makes me think he knows those songs better than he knows his own willy. ;) To me it feels like since most of the songs we rehearsed now were more or less new to him, he's happy with just laying down the main beats. Especially as he is an aspiring professional musician, it's a bit surprising that he's not paying more attention to details as he is, as it really makes the band as a whole sound a lot tighter and better.
 

Latest posts