• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Dunlop Flats, Medium & Short Scale Lengths

Hi all,

Does anyone know the length of Dunlop's flats, both the medium and short scale sets, ball end to silk?

I emailed Dunlop, but they told me the short scale were 30", medium 32". I'm sure this is incorrect...

Many thanks!
 
Does anyone know the length of Dunlop's flats, both the medium and short scale sets, ball end to silk?

I emailed Dunlop, but they told me the short scale were 30", medium 32". I'm sure this is incorrect...

I sent the same question to Dunlop a couple of weeks ago and got the same answer. Their customer service people don't seem to know the difference between "scale length" and "winding length".

Dunlop "medium scale" = 34" in winding length (ball to silk).
Dunlop "short scale" = 32" in winding length (ball to silk).

I got this info from Jason at Fret Nation.
 
I sent the same question to Dunlop a couple of weeks ago and got the same answer. Their customer service people don't seem to know the difference between "scale length" and "winding length".

Dunlop "medium scale" = 34" in winding length (ball to silk).
Dunlop "short scale" = 32" in winding length (ball to silk).

I got this info from Jason at Fret Nation.

Yes, Dunlop customer service has no idea What they're talking about. Smh.

Awesome. Sounds like the medium scale will work for my bass. I have chromes on now, but I think I'm getting some inharmonicity up the neck due to their stiffness (which is a shame, because I quite like the right hand feel, especially on the D and G strings).

Let me know if you empirically find them to have a different length if you buy a set. An Amazon review said medium was 33.5", and short was 32.5". Wasn't sure I could believe either measurement. It boggles my mind that this isn't standard info that all string manufacturers publish.

Thanks!
 
Roundwounds just feel wrong to me after playing on flats! I guess I'm a wimp haha

I just had a short test run with the GHS Brite Flats (Alloy 52 half-rounds) on my P bass. As their name implies, their main tonal character is more of a flatwound but still with some of the roundwound clarity and definition. I was quite pleased with the way they sat in a band mix with a nice full-bodied punch of a flat and definition and sustain of a round. The medium set (49-62-84-108) is available both in short-scale (32.75" winding) and medium-scale (35.5" winding).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Root 5
I just had a short test run with the GHS Brite Flats (Alloy 52 half-rounds) on my P bass. As their name implies, their main tonal character is more of a flatwound but still with some of the roundwound clarity and definition. I was quite pleased with the way they sat in a band mix with a nice full-bodied punch of a flat and definition and sustain of a round. The medium set (49-62-84-108) is available both in short-scale (32.75" winding) and medium-scale (35.5" winding).

Yeah I was actually reading the thread in which you talked about those this morning. How would you say the stiffness compares to flats? The gauges may be a step backwards for me, not because I wouldn't like the feel, but because I seem to be having inharmonicity issues with my medium scale Chromes on the E string (100 80 65 45), due to string stiffness.
 
How would you say the stiffness compares to flats?

Half-rounds in general tend to be stiffer than rounds of similar gauges. I've only tried the light set of the Brite Flats (45-56-77-98) and found them to be comfortable without feeling loose or floppy. I would guess the 49-108 set is at least as stiff as, or even stiffer than, the Chromes 45-100.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jhawk
31" silk-to-silk , and 32" silk-to-ball

IMG_20200709_184846.jpg
 
Last edited:

Hahaha I knew you'd find me! But really, who actually listens to the important information given on forums?

Actually, I did have everything planned out so that my bass would accept most short scale string sets without any fuss, but realized after I'd gotten further into the build that I needed to place the bridge about 1/4" farther from the nut. This suddenly put me in an awkward and even more limiting situation where only some medium and some short scale strings work...

But for what it's worth, I'm dreaming up a new medium scale (around 31.5-32") that will accept LOOOOONG scale strings. I have learned my lesson the hard way lol. At least my bass looks cool though. :laugh:;)
 
Last edited: