• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

*** EA iAMP Pro *** GOTTA SEE THIS!!!

EA likes to reuse stuff. The power amp in the iAMP500 is the same as the iAMP800, it just has a less powerful (read cheaper) transformer.

I wouldn't be surprised if the iAMP PRO also uses the same power amp, just with an even more powerful switching power supply.
Even if true, that doesn't make it bad. Actually a smart way to go. That's how we evolved from monkeys, by reusing lots of stuff and making a few small key changes... :p

Randy
 
I appreciate the fact they're trying but I don't understand the layout of the doubler. As far as I can tell, like the Micro, there is a switch for channels as well as individual gain knobs?

Also, I find the effects send/returns with mix knob to be kind of superfluous on an amp marketed to jazz players...the whole section seems like it's taking up too much panel space.

Three, and what I really don't understand is, why not 2 combo jacks?

It seems to me they could have done the whole thing in the context of the Micro chassis if they had employed a better layout.
 
I appreciate the fact they're trying but I don't understand the layout of the doubler. As far as I can tell, like the Micro, there is a switch for channels as well as individual gain knobs?

It seems to me they could have done the whole thing in the context of the Micro chassis if they had employed a better layout.

You know, I get the feeling their designs have a lot to do with the players they're consulting for design options... A lot of those guys already have those sorts of magic boxes and are looking for a simplified input layout.

<shrug>
 
I appreciate the fact they're trying but I don't understand the layout of the doubler. As far as I can tell, like the Micro, there is a switch for channels as well as individual gain knobs?

yes.... the gain from a mic on an upright and it's p/up output are very different, this way both channels can be balanced to the same audible level

Also, I find the effects send/returns with mix knob to be kind of superfluous on an amp marketed to jazz players...the whole section seems like it's taking up too much panel space.

most "Jazz" guys I know have their favourite reverb/delay units that they always use.

Three, and what I really don't understand is, why not 2 combo jacks?

2 combo jacks would take up too much room not to mention the high improbability of ever using two XLRs at one time for a bass (although much fun is garnered from engaging the probability drive)

It seems to me they could have done the whole thing in the context of the Micro chassis if they had employed a better layout.

if they had employed a better layout.... umm, Larry and John are kinda good at what they do and some might argue almost "Guru" status, they might employ a lot of stuff (like that crazy Dimin guy ;) ) but employing crap layouts is something they don't do.
 
yes.... the gain from a mic on an upright and it's p/up output are very different, this way both channels can be balanced to the same audible level

I was actually talking about the switch being redundant when you can just turn the gain all the way down. Not vice versa.

most "Jazz" guys I know have their favourite reverb/delay units that they always use.

Maybe guitarists...and I don't know too many guitarists using two channels, but I could be wrong. I have never met a bassist on a jazz gig who had a reverb/delay unit.

2 combo jacks would take up too much room not to mention the high improbability of ever using two XLRs at one time for a bass (although much fun is garnered from engaging the probability drive)

OK, I will split the difference with you. Howabout one combo jack and you will save the space of one XLR in?

if they had employed a better layout.... umm, Larry and John are kinda good at what they do and some might argue almost "Guru" status, they might employ a lot of stuff (like that crazy Dimin guy ;) ) but employing crap layouts is something they don't do.

I didn't call it a crap layout. I do believe they could have put most of the functionality into the Micro faceplate.

I just call it like I see it, I'm sure it's a great sounding amp.

W
 
not Jazz guitarists, friends of mine that are professional bassists that use their favourite reverb/delay processors for all of their gigs. (and their tone is insanely good)

and no you didn't say 'crap layout' that was my bad, I just think that when someone from the outside of things infers to a company like EA, that they could have come up with a better design, for all intents and purposes one might as well just say 'crap design' and be done with it.
 
I will say that the power addition to the Micro is very nice and with only a $75 price increase. At 500 watts, it could definitely take care of *MY* doubling needs in that I don't use and mic, effects of a notch filter. I may have to check that one out!

The Doubler is also a great deal if it's selling for $750 street per bass central.
 
I was actually talking about the switch being redundant when you can just turn the gain all the way down. Not vice versa.<SNIP>W

I like the fact that EA provided dual gain controls AND a channel-selection switch because it accommodates using two uses: different basses, each with their own EQ; or blending two channels as when using a pickup and a microphone simultaneously.
 
This new amp is looking good!
I am really enjoying my Micro 300, and I really like the effects loop, as I always bring my Boss VF-1 multi-effects for reverb on my 'lectric bass. :)

I have a plan to get a footswitch, so that when I am playing my double bass, I can turn the pickup off for arco sections and just use the mic, but haven't followed through on it yet. Anyway, if the pro sounds as good as the micro, I will be ordering one for sure.
 
Yeah, but it only goes down to 4 ohms. The reason I got the iAMP 800 is because of its ability to go down to 2 ohms. That's one of the prerequisites for me because of my cab set up.

It's actually a prerequisite for me too, because of my EA cabs!

They may think it is too powerful for the wizzys and aren't going to support them with this amp. But I am hoping that, like the iAMP500, they will announce it 2 ohms stable, but maybe with no power increase.
 
not Jazz guitarists, friends of mine that are professional bassists that use their favourite reverb/delay processors for all of their gigs. (and their tone is insanely good)

Really? Who?

and no you didn't say 'crap layout' that was my bad, I just think that when someone from the outside of things infers to a company like EA, that they could have come up with a better design, for all intents and purposes one might as well just say 'crap design' and be done with it.

Yes heaven forbid an actual bass player who doubles on electric and upright has an opinion about a product that targets him as a potential customer.
 
Really? Who?

apparently not you but local guys here that absolutely can hold their own and do, on an international level amongst 'the best'.


Yes heaven forbid an actual bass player who doubles on electric and upright has an opinion about a product that targets him as a potential customer.

wasn't knocking his opinion, god only knows we don't wanna do that type of thing around here is disagree with someone's opinion, was more shaking my head at the seeming inference of being able to design better than those who actually build/design/electrically engineer for a living.
that's all.

:smug: