The "Sterling by MusicMan" thing singlehandedly destroyed the resale value of the Sterling H and HH, and that is why there are so many used ones on the market right now- people can't sell them because casual buyers don't understand what they're looking at. They can't be sold for anywhere close to what they are worth. The names are confusing. And who would buy a new "MusicMan Sterling" when you can buy a "Sterling by MusicMan" for a fraction of the price? You have to know what you're looking at, and most people don't. It's never been their best seller but they've destroyed it with this move, and that's a shame because my Sterling has the best neck of any bass I've ever played.
I went into a music store recently to play a Caprice that was on clearance. The guy helping me wanted to put an active SBMM in my hands because it was "just as good" and not as expensive. The SBMM was an acceptable bass, but the neck on the Caprice was lightyears away from it. I bought the passive Caprice on sale for twice the money. At $1200 it was more than reasonably priced. I would not have bought it for $2300 because I was not really looking for a new bass, and apparently no one wanted to buy it for $1800 either, which was its original ticket price. Apparently there were quite a few of these on clearance at Guitar Centers all over the place. Why would they raise the price on something that's not selling? I don't know.
USA-built MusicMan basses are well-made, better by far than the high-end Fender that is currently my main player. But they've done themselves a lousy turn with some poor marketing decisions.