@LBS-bass
I never said the P bass was the best thing for all music. In fact, I literally said it might not always be the best choice. So we agree about that whether you realize it or not. I’m also glad you agree with me about the Warwick not being the right choice since literally sounding like itself was a problem… even if you don’t realize you agree with me. That’s OK too.
Now let’s get rid of the tuba analogy since you didn’t get it. When you say that the mythology of precision basses being best for the studio springs from people with non-functioning instruments having to use a precision bass that was available, I’m telling you that you’re wrong. I don’t mean to be rude, but for this premise to work, the P basses on hand at all these studios would have had to have already been an industry standard. Not to mention that this unlikely scenario would have had to have happened hundreds or thousands of times to become a driving force in the trajectory of the industry for decades to come. I’ve already illustrated how my experience mirrors that of professional session musicians with decades of experience. I pointed out that my Warwick, along with Sean Hurley‘s Lakland, were high quality instruments that still needed to be replaced by a precision bass on real (not hypothetical) sessions. Once again, not trying to be rude, but I know things can be misunderstood or misconstrued through text, so let me break it down one last time:
1.) There is no “mythology” as to why Precision basses work on sessions. They work because they are safe and inoffensive like a navy suit and white button down shirt.
2.) It’s highly doubtful that enough amateur musicians with non-functional instruments were getting enough session work to create an industry standard, and that all of those studios just happened to have the same instrument on hand.
3.) If my choice of instrument has to be changed into something else sonically during production, then it wasn’t the correct choice to begin with.