The old classic pro with the Gibson Pups is more aggressive sounding, because the Pups are hotter than the Vintage ones. If you’re into rock or metal, I would prefer the old one. But the New one is definitely a keeper too.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I can't compare it to the Classic Pro, but I have the Vintage Pro. I know hotness is all relative, but compared to my passive P and J, the Vintage Pro pickups are very, very hot. I can't run it at full volume with my drive pedals because it makes them fart out (in my direct-only, ampless pedalboard setup). I even tried lowering the pickup height . . . like all the way down, but they're still too hot. Not that it's an issue, really. They sound fantastic, and there are other ways to compensate for hot pickups. YMMV.The old classic pro with the Gibson Pups is more aggressive sounding, because the Pups are hotter than the Vintage ones. If you’re into rock or metal, I would prefer the old one. But the New one is definitely a keeper too.
View attachment 3148931
But to the comparison, based on what I've heard in videos online, I would agree that a classic would be better for certain types of rock, and certainly metal, because in my opinion it has a darker, more mid-scooped sound. The vintage is more for classic rock type vibes, IMHO.The old classic pro with the Gibson Pups is more aggressive sounding, because the Pups are hotter than the Vintage ones. If you’re into rock or metal, I would prefer the old one. But the New one is definitely a keeper too.
But to the comparison, based on what I've heard in videos online, I would agree that a classic would be better for certain types of rock, and certainly metal, because in my opinion it has a darker, more mid-scooped sound. The vintage is more for classic rock type vibes, IMHO.
I have the Classic Pro, and it sounds great. But I can not compare it with the Vintage Pro. I would love to own a VP so I could compare them myself, but my budget for new basses is on red numbers nowadays.
Anyway, the Classic Pro is a killer bass. Only thing I think that can be improved is the bridge. I have the look set on a Babicz replacement.
I will stay tuned to thread and see what other can say about both basses.
Good thread.
Has anyone put flatwounds or tapewounds on their Vintage Pro?
No, "brand new" 35-year-old flats on the Clasdic Pro.Do you mean the same set of 35-year old strings, but transferred to all those different basses?
Hey guys,
In searching the threads, I have seen some positive reviews of both the older Epiphone Thunderbird Classic Pro (not to be confused with the pro with the active electronics) and the new Thunderbird Vintage Pro. But can anyone actually compare them to each other? Does anyone own both? Apart from the obvious hardware differences, how would you compare the sound of them? I have listened to the reviews by Chris Catero on youtube, and it's hard to distinguish the difference. If anything, perhaps the new vintage pro sounds a bit brighter/harsher (not in a bad way). Maybe a little thinner compared to the classic pro with the actual Gibson pickups. I don't have a guitar store near me at which to compare them. Nobody around even has the new Vintage models in stock where I could try one out.
I know "better" is all relative and subjective, but what are your thoughts?
Thanks
Hey guys,
In searching the threads, I have seen some positive reviews of both the older Epiphone Thunderbird Classic Pro (not to be confused with the pro with the active electronics) and the new Thunderbird Vintage Pro. But can anyone actually compare them to each other? Does anyone own both? Apart from the obvious hardware differences, how would you compare the sound of them? I have listened to the reviews by Chris Catero on youtube, and it's hard to distinguish the difference. If anything, perhaps the new vintage pro sounds a bit brighter/harsher (not in a bad way). Maybe a little thinner compared to the classic pro with the actual Gibson pickups. I don't have a guitar store near me at which to compare them. Nobody around even has the new Vintage models in stock where I could try one out.
I know "better" is all relative and subjective, but what are your thoughts?
Thanks
