seamonkey said:Here's my prediction on a non-moderated double blind test.
Oh they'll sound the same but there will be special pleading about "Feel" or some other totally made up grap term than would be claim can not be recorded or measured.
It's happening before with Tube versus Solid-State, or Tube versus VT, or other modelers,emulators,simulators. Statistically there was not clear cut identification of the amps, or what sounded better. In jumped a special pleading term "feel". Oh sure they sound and perform the same but the 'feel" is different. BS. And there's no possible way to measure "feel". Mainly because it doesn't exist.
No matter what the blind test results are there will be special pleading about some aspect of the results.
Audio forums have already done the tests. There's no difference. There is not going to be any revelation here.
Here it is. How's an audio amp going to demonstrate feel with a recorded source? I know when I've played outside concerts in 90% humidity 15 ft from a lake and my rig feels less snappish. I know if an amp responds quickly or slowly. Shall I say delivers transients with less delay than another rig. Ask a tennis player if his balls are dead.
It's the same argument over and over. Really, do some of you actually play instruments?
Are you a hobbiest who collects and plays gear at home?
Are you a pro?
How long have you been playing?
I ask all this not for answers here but that you will self edit whether you are qualified to speak with authority on these subjects.
There was a poster on TB who could afford some hi end bass gear. He kept saying it really cut in the mix. Turns out he only uses this gear in his basement with his middle school daughter on trumpet and slightly older son on drums. Is his experience with cutting in the mix the same as he who has played 30+ years of roadside bar gigs, large concert series etc. with a B3 player and full horn section?