• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Ethical question about a tree in my yard.

hbarcat

Supporting Member
Aug 24, 2006
10,227
18,610
Rochelle, Illinois
There is an enormous cottonwood tree in my backyard. For about a month, every summer, it constantly sheds blobs of cotton that float around the entire neighborhood and get on and in everything. It looks a lot like snow except that it doesn't melt.

Several of my neighbors have asked me to cut it down because it's a real nuisance. It gets inside their cars and in their houses. It clogs up window unit air conditioners.

I agree with them. I fully understand their annoyance. In fact, recently I was sitting on my back porch and I actually inhaled one of the floating cotton blobs and it went down into my lungs and I was coughing for about 10 minutes.

I looked into cutting the tree down and the lowest quote I got was $4,500 because of its gargantuan size and other issues like difficult accessibility and close proximity to multiple buildings and power lines.

I was told by one tree removal company that he can't remember seeing a tree more difficult to remove than this one. He quoted me $7,000, I assume because he really didn't want to do the job so he quoted an inflated price, expecting me to reject it.

The bottom line is, there's just no way that I can afford $4,500 right now. In fact, I've got a pile of medical bills I'm struggling to pay off and I've been selling nearly all of my non necessary personal possessions that have any value at all in order to get back in the black ink again. Spending that amount of money out of my pocket would literally ruin me, right now.

Nevertheless, last week I talked to two of my neighbors who complained about the tree and I made them an offer. I said that I'd agree to remove the tree and pay $1,500 toward the cost, if they'd contribute the remaining $3,000.

They both rejected my offer and told me that they weren't going to pay anything and it was my legal responsibility to pay for it.

I consulted my lawyer and he told me that since the tree was healthy and there was no reason to believe that it might imminently fall on someone's house or other property, then I can legally leave it up. The fact that it sheds cotton is just part of the nature of the tree and I don't have any legal obligation to mitigate that.

I do have to admit an ulterior motive, here. The house I live in was built by my grandparents in the 1930s, when they immigrated here from Canada. The tree was planted in 1942, specifically to commemorate the birth of my father. I wish to keep the tree, partly for sentimental reasons. but also, because it provides a lot of shade in the summer and it keeps my house significantly cooler than if it wasn’t there. And it looks cool. It dwarfs every other tree in the entire neighborhood.

My question is, can anyone suggest a way out of this dilemma? Frankly, if it wasn't for the cost, I'd agree to take the tree down. I don't want to be a bad neighbor and this cottonwood is genuinely a nuisance. If I was my neighbor, I'd be really annoyed by it, but I just don't see any reasonable path forward where everybody is happy.
 
Last edited:
My advice: Enjoy your female cottonwood tree and put in some effort to keep it healthy. AFAIK the biggest issue is making sure it does not get too dried out, as they are a lowland tree usually found around rivers and streams.

I have a male cottonwood in my back yard; so no cotton. It seems to be in decline. Every couple of years I spend a couple thousand to take out dead wood. Cost for removal was quoted over $7,000. I have been here about 13 years and have spent close to that amount on trimming.
 
Keep the tree.
There's no legal obligation on you to do anything, and you've made a fair offer to those it's annoying, even despite it's sentimental value to you.
You're a better man than I am for doing that much.

Maybe research if there's a way to 'neuter' it, so the cotton doesn't spread, but without killing it?
I've no idea if that's a possibility, of course.
 
I've had to remove two trees - a California Oak and a Siberian Elm. Neither should have been planted in the first place and both became not only difficult, but also dangerous. Both cost a lot to remove and I did much of the "root" work on the Elm.

Getting permits where I live made it also very difficult, but worth it!

Perhaps a wider number of neighbors might chip in? A go-fund me? Ask the city?

My city recently removed a tree along the boulevard that had it's noxious side - whoopee.

I've also kept a lot of vegetation and habitat for birds and bees.
 
They're not "really annoyed" if they're not willing to help cover costs.
Ding ding. Winner winner, chicken dinner.

Absent a dangerous condition, you're not obliged to do anything with an otherwise healthy tree. You made a reasonable offer, but they turned it down. In so doing, they chose to keep the tree too. Let them sue the wind for blowing in their direction if they think they can.

Your medical bills take precedence. You are ethically in the clear.
 
There is an enormous cottonwood tree in my backyard. For about a month, every summer, it constantly sheds blobs of cotton that float around the entire neighborhood and get on and in everything. It looks a lot like snow except that it doesn't melt.

Several of my neighbors have asked me to cut it down because it's a real nuisance. It gets inside their cars and in their houses. It clogs up window unit air conditioners.

I agree with them. I fully understand their annoyance. In fact, recently I was sitting on my back porch and I actually inhaled one of the floating cotton blobs and it went down into my lungs and I was coughing for about 10 minutes.

I looked into cutting the tree down and the lowest quote I got was $4,500 because of its gargantuan size and other issues like difficult accessibility and close proximity to multiple buildings and power lines.

I was told by one tree removal company that he can't remember seeing a tree more difficult to remove than this one. He quoted me $7,000, I assume because he really didn't want to do the job so he quoted an inflated price, expecting me to reject it.

The bottom line is, there's just no way that I can afford $4,500 right now. In fact, I've got a pile of medical bills I'm struggling to pay off and I've been selling nearly all of my non necessary personal possessions that have any value at all in order to get back in the black ink again. Spending that amount of money out of my pocket would literally ruin me, right now.

Nevertheless, last week I talked to two of my neighbors who complained about the tree and I made them an offer. I said that I'd agree to remove the tree and pay $1,500 toward the cost, if they'd contribute the remaining $3,000.

They both rejected my offer and told me that they weren't going to pay anything and it was my legal responsibility to pay for it.

I consulted my lawyer and he told me that since the tree was healthy and there was no reason to believe that it might imminently fall on someone's house or other property, then I can legally leave it up. The fact that it sheds cotton is just part of the nature of the tree and I don't have any legal obligation to mitigate that.

I do have to admit an ulterior motive, here. The house I live in was built by my grandparents in the 1930s, when they immigrated here from Canada. The tree was planted in 1942, specifically to commemorate the birth of my father. I wish to keep the tree, partly for sentimental reasons. but also, because it provides a lot of shade in the summer and it keeps my house significantly cooler than if it wasn’t there. And it looks cool. It dwarfs every other tree in the entire neighborhood.

My question is, can anyone suggest a way out of this dilemma? Frankly, if it wasn't for the cost, I'd agree to take the tree down. I don't want to be a bad neighbor and this cottonwood is genuinely a nuisance. If I was my neighbor, I'd be really annoyed by it, but I just don't see any reasonable path forward where everybody is happy.

Presently, there is no choice because the funds are not available to take down the tree. I see no dilemma.
 
People living in modern life conditions forget that we share planet with other life forms and feel like nature has to bend all the way so they will be comfortable.
How dares this tree to clog up the AC filters and stick to cars? What's next, animals running around in those forests, or god forbid, fish swimming in the seas? Disgrace, I say.
Just ignore.
My neighborhood was founded in the 1930s and nearly all of the houses now are original to that time. As you might imagine, there are a great many large, mature trees here and a lot of us value that.

Two years ago, the house just across the street sold, and the new owners promptly cut down all three mature maples and a mature oak on their ¼ acre property.

I asked them the reason why and they said because they didn't want to have to rake leaves in the fall and pick up twigs.
:rollno:

That's how little some people value nature.
 
LOL!

That's a fantastic idea, but as much fun as that sounds, I think that it might start a genuine feud that I'd be on the losing end of.
Smart! Quit while you're ahead. Seriously though, your offer to split the costs was thoughtful and considerate. The fact that they didn't even consider your offer does not reflect well on them, IMO.
 

Latest posts