Most everything in New England is over-priced and I don't think they are an exception.
I'm not sure what you expect from a $2K bass.... made in America
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Most everything in New England is over-priced and I don't think they are an exception.
I consider 2k over-priced for any ply bass - that is just me. In comparison with other basses of the same or better value, Upton is not the best bass you can get for your money. End of story. You are paying for more than what the instrument is and how it sounds, which is a luxury some people have and enjoy.I'm not sure what you expect from a $2K bass.... made in America
I exchanged emails with them about their grossly overpriced re-hairs, and was unimpressed - they seemed to arbitrarily charging master bow maker prices.
I've only tried carved and hybrid Uptons - was not blown away. They may have the magical ply bass that would change my mind. I've been impressed with a New Standard and couple of nicely set up Kays in my life and nothing else plywood, but, I've never tired the Upton plys.i just find it ironic that you call them out for their "arbitrary" prices when your opinion on what their value is is also arbitrary.
I've owned Eberle, Shen, King Mortone, Karl Meisel and an Upton. In my "arbitrary" opinion, the Upton is the best value at the same price point.
I have an Upton Brescian and I absolutely love it. I bought it used, so I can't speak to their customer service. My Brescian was actually custom made with a ply top, rather than the hybrids or fully carved ones that they offer, but it sounds better than many hybrids that I have heard. Here's a video I did yesterday of some Bach in solo tuning on it. There are several other clips on my Facebook page if you want to give them a listen. They are cell phone videos but they can give you an idea. It has a big sound!
I will admit that sounds really good. Great playing and great sound!
Hi, Damon (and all),
We’ve been following this thread and appreciating the good with the bad…lots of happy owners, which is always nice to hear. A few missed eMails too, which although is not good to hear, but needs to be heard so we can look at how we do things and get better! I know Gary and/or myself keep a tighter eye on the [email protected] address now more than ever as its a general population eMail that several people here follow…and with some days getting 100 emails (and more), it can be a lot to keep up with.
So, if you’re one of the few we’ve missed or neglected over the years, our humble apologies!!!
But Damon, I have to take issue with some of your claims and statements...
“I think in some of the lower end basses I saw, durability should have been a focus, but, they had thin tops and backs.”
Damon, this couldn’t be further from the truth, and it's completely without basis…and with what building experience can you adequately determine this?
Because we’re building them right…both built to last and sound good, we back them up with a 5-year warranty…something NO other builder does.
Pride of authorship also keeps the workmanship, at all price points, high. There’s not 100’s of us here to point the finger back and forth if something isn’t right. There’s 5 of us building all the basses...and anyone can walk in at any time and watch us work, the main entrance is right into the workshop, not the showroom. You've seen it...you've been here.
We know who pressed the plates or ribs. We know who joined the top and back and carved it. We know who set the neck, who detailed and varnished it, and we know who set it up to play.
"At the entry level the Uptons I've played are LESS impressive than a Shen, not equal."
Where those the Shen's without the twisted necks? Maybe the ones without the 4 piece bolted scrolls (we have plenty of pictures)? Or maybe the ones that had neck joints that actually were fit? Or the laminated spruce tops "Cosmetically Veneered Tops".
We fully expect these things we make to outlive ourselves…and we like that. It’s our immorality…it’s why we all crowd around the bench to look at a 300-year-old Maggini when it walks in…wondering how many Upton’s will have the same fate.
Now, for the thin plates…that’s a real head scratcher for me. I just measured a Shen laminate plate and its 5.5mm (we had to buy one back from the customer as the fingerboard fell off and the neck heel separated, its a loaner now, anyone can come to inspect it), while the Upton is 5.8mm.
But ok, that’s laminated bass, and you said, “I’ve only tried carved and hybrid Uptons”.
So let’s talk about solid plates since this is what you categorically stated was too thin.
Our flat-back are either 6.5mm for poplar or 6mm for maple. Occasionally we go into the 5.5-5.8mm range for really hard maples, like the English Sycamore. In the end, you have to let the wood tell you…and decisions have to be made when you’re thicknessing.
Our standard tops are domestic Sitka spruce from the pacific northwest and are carved with a full arching (no recurve) and are 8mm all around. Pretty generous actually.
Deluxe tops are German spruce from a very well regarded and used woodcutter. They’re 8mm under the bridge and through the sound holes and have a graduated thickness going to about 6mm through the upper and lower bouts with a good recurve on the outside of the arch, flaring up to a healthy 7-8mm edge thickness.
Fully carved backs have a much more complicate graduation pattern and will vary from wood choices like the flat-backs…but workshop guidelines keep us in line and, as I said above, you have to let the wood tell you…and decisions have to be made when you’re thicknessing. It's pretty common to have about +10mm under the soundpost and gradually thinning out to the upper and lower bouts using a very traditional Sacconi style graduation pattern. I don't think a single shop out there would measure a plate and say, "wow, this is out of the norm".
Damon, we know the bar is extremely high every time. Our customer's expectations of what we give them (a handmade double bass) in comparison to what they give us (their hard-won money) are about 2 to 1, from our point of view. You pay us $2k while expecting $4k. $5k paid, $10k expected. Etc. Etc.
That’s OK! That’s the way we like it, that’s the way we’ve always done it, and we will continue to do it for a very long time. That's why when someone is taking that leap of faith and asking us to build them something that doesn't exist, were a safe bet. Because of all of the advertising, website building, video shooting, social media posting...and chest thumping... it's all short-lived if you can't back it up with something that exceeds expectations.
Damon, we don’t expect to make everyone happy, although we try like hell. We’ve always had our naysayers and our defenders alike. I’m not sure if the root cause of your gross generalizations and unfounded statements against us are because you didn’t like our rehair prices? Is it that simple?
Also, this comment seemed weird…you said, “I consider 2k over-priced for any ply bass” but then you went on to say, “I’ve been impressed with a New Standard”, which is over double that stated figure.
It’s such a generalized statement…that $2K is overpriced for any laminated bass. How do you figure this math out? Have you cost-effectively built one? Two? Hundreds?
Is it because a Chinese bass leaves China invoiced for $300?
It then gets another $300 in shipping to get it to a distributor, who then raises the price 50-100% to the retailer (with another $300 in domestic shipping) before the retailer then raises it another 50-100% (some more because they throw out the cheap parts and start anew) to the end user?
Making basses in America…our parts cost more because they are all top notch parts, we don't skimp (really…we ask often if we need to be putting a $$$ carbon fiber endpin assembly, made in the USA, into our Standard level basses…but then again, the phone never rings because an endpin doesn’t work right).
Our wood costs more because it's sustainable and responsibly bought.
Our labor costs more because we pay a living wage.
And we keep our prices in check with what people can afford by utilizing a DTC business model.
“I expected them to be more of a cool local bass shop based on their rep. and videos. I didn't find that to be the case.”
OK, now that’s just hitting below the belt…lol. We’re wicked cool! SMH
So, in true old school TBDB fashion, this thread will light up like a Christmas tree now and get shut down. I don't look at TB much these days (lots of luthiers seem to go this route) but it's good to know some things never change.![]()
We fully expect these things we make to outlive ourselves…and we like that. It’s our immorality…it’s why we all crowd around the bench to look at a 300-year-old Maggini when it walks in…
... BOOM ROASTED...Hi, Damon (and all),
We’ve been following this thread and appreciating the good with the bad…lots of happy owners, which is always nice to hear. A few missed eMails too, which although is not good to hear, but needs to be heard so we can look at how we do things and get better! I know Gary and/or myself keep a tighter eye on the [email protected] address now more than ever as its a general population eMail that several people here follow…and with some days getting 100 emails (and more), it can be a lot to keep up with.
So, if you’re one of the few we’ve missed or neglected over the years, our humble apologies!!!
But Damon, I have to take issue with some of your claims and statements...
“I think in some of the lower end basses I saw, durability should have been a focus, but, they had thin tops and backs.”
Damon, this couldn’t be further from the truth, and it's completely without basis…and with what building experience can you adequately determine this?
Because we’re building them right…both built to last and sound good, we back them up with a 5-year warranty…something NO other builder does.
Pride of authorship also keeps the workmanship, at all price points, high. There’s not 100’s of us here to point the finger back and forth if something isn’t right. There’s 5 of us building all the basses...and anyone can walk in at any time and watch us work, the main entrance is right into the workshop, not the showroom. You've seen it...you've been here.
We know who pressed the plates or ribs. We know who joined the top and back and carved it. We know who set the neck, who detailed and varnished it, and we know who set it up to play.
"At the entry level the Uptons I've played are LESS impressive than a Shen, not equal."
Where those the Shen's without the twisted necks? Maybe the ones without the 4 piece bolted scrolls (we have plenty of pictures)? Or maybe the ones that had neck joints that actually were fit? Or the laminated spruce tops "Cosmetically Veneered Tops".
We fully expect these things we make to outlive ourselves…and we like that. It’s our immorality…it’s why we all crowd around the bench to look at a 300-year-old Maggini when it walks in…wondering how many Upton’s will have the same fate.
Now, for the thin plates…that’s a real head scratcher for me. I just measured a Shen laminate plate and its 5.5mm (we had to buy one back from the customer as the fingerboard fell off and the neck heel separated, its a loaner now, anyone can come to inspect it), while the Upton is 5.8mm.
But ok, that’s laminated bass, and you said, “I’ve only tried carved and hybrid Uptons”.
So let’s talk about solid plates since this is what you categorically stated was too thin.
Our flat-back are either 6.5mm for poplar or 6mm for maple. Occasionally we go into the 5.5-5.8mm range for really hard maples, like the English Sycamore. In the end, you have to let the wood tell you…and decisions have to be made when you’re thicknessing.
Our standard tops are domestic Sitka spruce from the pacific northwest and are carved with a full arching (no recurve) and are 8mm all around. Pretty generous actually.
Deluxe tops are German spruce from a very well regarded and used woodcutter. They’re 8mm under the bridge and through the sound holes and have a graduated thickness going to about 6mm through the upper and lower bouts with a good recurve on the outside of the arch, flaring up to a healthy 7-8mm edge thickness.
Fully carved backs have a much more complicate graduation pattern and will vary from wood choices like the flat-backs…but workshop guidelines keep us in line and, as I said above, you have to let the wood tell you…and decisions have to be made when you’re thicknessing. It's pretty common to have about +10mm under the soundpost and gradually thinning out to the upper and lower bouts using a very traditional Sacconi style graduation pattern. I don't think a single shop out there would measure a plate and say, "wow, this is out of the norm".
Damon, we know the bar is extremely high every time. Our customer's expectations of what we give them (a handmade double bass) in comparison to what they give us (their hard-won money) are about 2 to 1, from our point of view. You pay us $2k while expecting $4k. $5k paid, $10k expected. Etc. Etc.
That’s OK! That’s the way we like it, that’s the way we’ve always done it, and we will continue to do it for a very long time. That's why when someone is taking that leap of faith and asking us to build them something that doesn't exist, were a safe bet. Because of all of the advertising, website building, video shooting, social media posting...and chest thumping... it's all short-lived if you can't back it up with something that exceeds expectations.
Damon, we don’t expect to make everyone happy, although we try like hell. We’ve always had our naysayers and our defenders alike. I’m not sure if the root cause of your gross generalizations and unfounded statements against us are because you didn’t like our rehair prices? Is it that simple?
Also, this comment seemed weird…you said, “I consider 2k over-priced for any ply bass” but then you went on to say, “I’ve been impressed with a New Standard”, which is over double that stated figure.
It’s such a generalized statement…that $2K is overpriced for any laminated bass. How do you figure this math out? Have you cost-effectively built one? Two? Hundreds?
Is it because a Chinese bass leaves China invoiced for $300?
It then gets another $300 in shipping to get it to a distributor, who then raises the price 50-100% to the retailer (with another $300 in domestic shipping) before the retailer then raises it another 50-100% (some more because they throw out the cheap parts and start anew) to the end user?
Making basses in America…our parts cost more because they are all top notch parts, we don't skimp (really…we ask often if we need to be putting a $$$ carbon fiber endpin assembly, made in the USA, into our Standard level basses…but then again, the phone never rings because an endpin doesn’t work right).
Our wood costs more because it's sustainable and responsibly bought.
Our labor costs more because we pay a living wage.
And we keep our prices in check with what people can afford by utilizing a DTC business model.
“I expected them to be more of a cool local bass shop based on their rep. and videos. I didn't find that to be the case.”
OK, now that’s just hitting below the belt…lol. We’re wicked cool! SMH
So, in true old school TBDB fashion, this thread will light up like a Christmas tree now and get shut down. I don't look at TB much these days (lots of luthiers seem to go this route) but it's good to know some things never change.![]()
We’ve been following this thread and appreciating the good with the bad…lots of happy owners, which is always nice to hear.
Go learn how to rehair then, and then buy and stock all the varieties of hair and tools, and take a crack at it, and then do it over an over and over until you get it right every time.Rehairs are the oil changes of this world