• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Favorite bass headstock?

My favorites are probably the Ibanez SR and Affirma, and any inline "hockey stick". They look really cool, but more importantly are very functional. Straight string pull, and a tilt back design, making string trees and guides unnecessary.
IMG_20250427_000604449.jpg
images (1).jpeg
images.jpeg
 
I dunno...Steinberger, maybe? 🤪

Seriously, though...I am super-biased, but my personal favorite is a black-painted Fender headstock. Plain or tinted is nice, but I keep falling back on Coco Chanel's advice; "Black goes with everything and is always chic." 😎

tCDsTyy.jpeg


And, while we're on the subject of "headstocks", I have to post the headstock that made me want to get a bass in the first place, the Squier Standard P-Bass Special in Satin Pewter Metallic on the left, along with it's brethren.

B6Vv2nI.jpeg
 
I like the G&L headstock actually

I didn't know G&L until I saw a band live, I loved the tone of the bassist and he was playing a bass I had never seen before, but I was too far away from him to read the name of the brand. I remember going back home and searching Google image for bass headstocks until I recognise it, and read the story about Leo's last company, and I bought a L2000 directly after that.

1745733466209.png


Also like Reverend and Acinonyx headstock, both original and distinctive but well designed and balanced IMHO

1745733713474.png


1745733759349.png
 
Last edited:
It'd be a crime not to say the 4001/4003 in my book. Other than that I'm going to have to hand it to the Ernie Ball stingray. Both unique looking but timeless.
Well...
Much as I like my 4001 and 4003 headstocks - which , being leftys, are... reversed (the 4001 used the right handed headstock; the 4003 has a "lefty" headstock). I don't really have a problem with any of my other 25 bass's headstocks (one of which is headless - and so, doesn't have one). They simply are what they are....I have a Kramer 450B with the "Tuning Fork" head stock; a couple of G&L's; an Eastwood clone of a Gibson "Flying Vee"; and a bunch of others. To me? They simply are what they are...To fill the various spots in my "Bass Herd"? Headstock shape is not a criteria; things like "Short Scale Hollow-body" are. I could really care less what the head stock shape is - as long as it's a left handed, 4- string bass. But, yeah; I do like Rick head stocks... :cool:
 
3 pages and no Thunderbird? It's not like they neck dive because of the good-looking headstock design.
To clarify my post a bit, I really like the eagle beak Thunderbird headstock:
1000029904.jpg

I think the neck dive is mainly because of the large tuners (that look good), not-thin-enough neck, and too-lightweight body. When I had my Gibson Bird it didn't really dive, and this Epiphone bird isn't the biggest diver, either.
 
Rickenbacker for classic elegance. Gibson for symmetry. Post-57 Fender for cleverness. But not tilting back is a deal-breaker for me. And the Tele shape is absolutely atrocious.

Also, big tuners are ridiculous, and another deal-breaker for me.

But my favorites are Ned’s original and current designs. The epitome of form-follows-function!

1745757566046.png


1745757658360.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flarp Technolog
Like lots of folks, I imprinted on the classic late-50s-onward Fender shape, and for a long time, nothing else would do. I especially hated the older Tele-style… looked like a deflated balloon!

These days, I’ve come around to the Tele-style (after playing a ‘54-knockoff Squier for 15 years), and now the later Fender style seems too big and bloated by comparison… go figure.