It's not like Gibson cut the trees down anyway. They bought the wood from someone, right? Why not go after the source?
I swear officer, I didn't harvest this cocaine!
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
It's not like Gibson cut the trees down anyway. They bought the wood from someone, right? Why not go after the source?
You see, I kinda disagree - but I get what you're saying.
I think , in this instance, Gibson is the responsible party. They are the importer turning around a product for us to buy. In your analogy, it seems to me that the end-user (guitarist) is the "immigrant sitting at home" and Gibson is the "company that hired them". Gibson is the entity bound by U.S. importation law, not the off-shore lumber wholesaler.
Having any impediments to "successful manufacturing" is not in the plans of Rupert Murdoch's Wall Street Journal.
Having any impediments to "successful manufacturing" is not in the plans of Rupert Murdoch's Wall Street Journal.

they likened ebony wood in madagascar to africa's blood diamond? is that a serious thing? is wood no longer a renewable resource that doesn't take centuries to produce?
Rupert Murdoch and The Wall Street Journal have stock in Gibson?
Any opportunity to spout political BS huh?
Yes, you are correct, Rupert Murdoch will take any opportunity to spout political BS.
Just curious, anyone on talkbass ever have US Customs confiscate your bass because your wood was "illegal"?
Rupert Murdoch and The Wall Street Journal have stock in Gibson?
/QUOTE]
Yes, you are correct, Rupert Murdoch will take any opportunity to spout political BS.
Just curious, anyone on talkbass ever have US Customs confiscate your bass because your wood was "illegal"?
Please cite which part of this story is BS, otherwise pleae keep your political BS off TB!!
Love how criticizing the government isn't considered political. However don't dare criticize an article by the WSJ.
Love how criticizing the government isn't considered political. However don't dare criticize an article by the WSJ.