TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
To be honest, I think you should go back and play the StingRay again through the Aguilar rig they have in store.
I never really thought my Rumble brought out the best in my StingRays. When I switched to MarkBass it brought more out of them. Then when I switched to Aguilar ….. well now I feel they are at their best.
Also that Sadowsky reminds me a lot of my Sandberg with its pickups and articulation. Basses like that pair well with warmer voiced amps like the Rumbles. Mine sure did. But it also sounds good with the Aguilar .
The strings might look fresh on the StingRay and they come stock with Slinky’s . They sound great but to me they die too quickly . They can look fresh and new and be dead as a doornail.
Your 19mm spacing preference might be a factor here as well.
Go back and play it again through the Aguilar .
Stingray for the Joe Dart staccato 16th notes, Sadowsky for everything else.
Couldn't have said it better myself.Everything within me wanted to vote StingRay5 Special, but that Sadowsky had more presence , clarity, bite, and versatility. That bass is quite impressive.
Based on the sound in the videos alone, I'd say I prefer the Sadowsky. But, feel, sizing (string spacing, neck width, etc...) should factor in.
I thought you already had a SBMM Ray5? If that's still the case, I'd be more inclined to go with the Sadowsky. But that SR5 is my favourite of their current finishes.
That was my experience with the HH as well.I also prefer the H to the HH. I can live happily without the tones the neck humbucker offers.
Sound wise, I also liked the Sadowsky far more than I thought I would. I've owned a couple of NY Sadowskys and they've never quite gelled for me. But that particular one sounded great.I love the Sadowsky far more than I thought I would, but I suspect folks are right about the Stingray sounding better with fresh strings and it is $1,200 cheaper than the Sadowsky.
Nice test and a tough decision but I prefer the Sadowsky (own 2 MM SR's).
Can the JM Sadowsky also get a similar tone to a Sadowsky JJ?
Absolutely agree with this, in a stingray fan boy, but the Sadowsky sounds better here, super crisp and and punchy, it’s always gonna be more versatile with the two pickups too.Everything within me wanted to vote StingRay5 Special, but that Sadowsky had more presence , clarity, bite, and versatility. That bass is quite impressive.