• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Feedback Wanted on tone preference.

Which of these basses sound best to you?

  • Sadowsky

    Votes: 107 59.8%
  • Stingray Special

    Votes: 42 23.5%
  • You sound the same.

    Votes: 14 7.8%
  • It’s a toss up.

    Votes: 16 8.9%

  • Total voters
    179
To be honest, I think you should go back and play the StingRay again through the Aguilar rig they have in store.
I never really thought my Rumble brought out the best in my StingRays. When I switched to MarkBass it brought more out of them. Then when I switched to Aguilar ….. well now I feel they are at their best.

Also that Sadowsky reminds me a lot of my Sandberg with its pickups and articulation. Basses like that pair well with warmer voiced amps like the Rumbles. Mine sure did. But it also sounds good with the Aguilar .

The strings might look fresh on the StingRay and they come stock with Slinky’s . They sound great but to me they die too quickly . They can look fresh and new and be dead as a doornail.

Your 19mm spacing preference might be a factor here as well.


Go back and play it again through the Aguilar .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lance Bunyon
I voted Sadowsky but IME it's really important how it sounds in a live band setting if that's where you will be using it. You obviously can't try it in a band setting, so your own experience needs to kick in when deciding. Not much help I guess.... It's the old "a P-bass sounds terrible on its own but is a dream in a band mix" thing. :)
 
To be honest, I think you should go back and play the StingRay again through the Aguilar rig they have in store.
I never really thought my Rumble brought out the best in my StingRays. When I switched to MarkBass it brought more out of them. Then when I switched to Aguilar ….. well now I feel they are at their best.

Also that Sadowsky reminds me a lot of my Sandberg with its pickups and articulation. Basses like that pair well with warmer voiced amps like the Rumbles. Mine sure did. But it also sounds good with the Aguilar .

The strings might look fresh on the StingRay and they come stock with Slinky’s . They sound great but to me they die too quickly . They can look fresh and new and be dead as a doornail.

Your 19mm spacing preference might be a factor here as well.


Go back and play it again through the Aguilar .

I won’t be back before January. The folks there were very nice, but I don’t want to come a bunch of times to just kick the tires. When I come again, I want to be in a position to buy something.
 
Everything within me wanted to vote StingRay5 Special, but that Sadowsky had more presence , clarity, bite, and versatility. That bass is quite impressive.
Couldn't have said it better myself. :thumbsup: It was obvious after watching the first 20 seconds of each video.
 
Based on the sound in the videos alone, I'd say I prefer the Sadowsky. But, feel, sizing (string spacing, neck width, etc...) should factor in.

I thought you already had a SBMM Ray5? If that's still the case, I'd be more inclined to go with the Sadowsky. But that SR5 is my favourite of their current finishes.

Yes, I have a SBMM HH, it is good, but not Stingray Special good. I also prefer the H to the HH. I can live happily without the tones the neck humbucker offers. I love the Sadowsky far more than I thought I would, but I suspect folks are right about the Stingray sounding better with fresh strings and it is $1,200 cheaper than the Sadowsky. I like the Sadowsky better, but I know for a fact that I would enjoy the Ray if I got it. I will see what my money looks like in the New Year, and as I said earlier, I may wait until summer, 2026, when I retire because I really want to genuinely get what I want, not simply buy something that is “good enough.”
 
I would never buy a bass with as much fretbuzz as that Sadowsky. Hopefully just a setup issue...?

Apart from that, the sound quality of a recording made with a phone isn't really good enough for any meaningful comparison IMO. The only person who knows what these basses actually sounded like is YOU.
 
I also prefer the H to the HH. I can live happily without the tones the neck humbucker offers.
That was my experience with the HH as well.

I love the Sadowsky far more than I thought I would, but I suspect folks are right about the Stingray sounding better with fresh strings and it is $1,200 cheaper than the Sadowsky.
Sound wise, I also liked the Sadowsky far more than I thought I would. I've owned a couple of NY Sadowskys and they've never quite gelled for me. But that particular one sounded great. :thumbsup: I'm skeptical that new strings on the Stingray might make that big a difference. If I was making a decision between those two basses, it would be that particular Sadowsky, not one that you might find two years from now. YOLO!
 
  • Like
Reactions: bass12