• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Fender Aerodyne Club!

La Bella LTF strings still in the good graces of the bass playing community? If I get a new Jazz I may give them a whirl.
Yes but only on a Precision! Seriously though I really like the set of Gold Flats I have on my Vintera Jazz. Something about Flats and 60s voiced pickups to me is like peanut butter and jelly. I heard about everyone putting Flats on Ps but never much on Js. I figured I'd find out for myself and I'm glad I did. Often times with rounds on a Jazz and I'm playing fingerstyle, I play with the tone rolled off. These Flats allow me to dial back in some of that tone without being too harsh. They sound even better tone off for that "60s" vibe. I have concentric stacked knobs on that bass and I really like playing both volumes full on and the neck tone full off and the bridge tone full on. I've only had them on about six months now and they settled in well. I can't wait to see them in six years!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Kevlanco
I have some labella nickel rounds (the Chicago music exchange collab strings) I’m going to pop on the jazz bass today. Not sure if I want to commit my aerodyne P to using flats or not. I don’t have a need for vintage flat sound and quite dislike chromes, so I was thinking of throwing the green silk fender flats on to see if I can retain some grit.
 
Okay, I went back about 10 pages. Most of the discussion seemed to be about the different colors and how harsh the stock strings sound. So, I'll ask again, what's it like going from a 7.25 radius to a 12 radius ? How do they sound compared to a stock Jazz ? Balance, feel ?
This is purely my own experience and shouldn't be applied to everyone, but for me, my first time trying out a 12" radius was not good.

Here's a true story I've shared across the forum, but I don't believe I've told it here. When I assembled my first parts-bass, I used the neck from a Squier Deluxe Jazz Active IV.

CuCcToN.jpg


Like with any first start, my dissatisfaction with it was actually a great learning experience. As much as I wanted to, I simply couldn't bond with it. One lesson learned was that I prefer two pickup instruments. The other, bigger lesson took me a little while to suss out. For some reason, the neck did not feel comfortable in my fretting hand and for the life of me, I couldn't figure out why! :banghead:

A little later, I went on a trip with my wife. I decided to bring my Aerodyne with me since it hadn't gotten much attention for quite some time. After hauling it out for a little practice-time, I was marveling at how comfortable it felt, especially to my fretting hand. So, I whipped out my phone and called up the specs of the 'Dyne and compared it to the Squier Deluxe. Lo and behold, 7.25" versus 12"! That not only explained why I wasn't bonding with my parts-bass on the ergonomic front, but why similarly radius'd necks from other manufacturers (Ibanez, Warwick, etc...) didn't feel "right" for me.

Do I know for sure why this is? No, but I suspect my very hands-on, half-my-life career has something to do with it. All I know is curvier fretboards are my lane. I can do 9.5" without a problem, but I tend to steer clear of anything flatter. However, in the interest of getting all scientific and stuff, I will eventually sample some second-gen Aerodynes to see how I take to them. Who knows? I could be pleasantly surprised!
DC8qIyw.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: jnewmark
My hands must be changing or something. For years I have been playing a '95 J that, recently has felt " chunky " in my hands. I have other J's with less chunky feeling necks, but I have no idea what the radius is on them, as I'm assuming the '95 has a 9.5. or so I have read. Is there an easy way to measure the radius of a neck, with simple tools? Would love to know about the other necks.
 
My hands must be changing or something. For years I have been playing a '95 J that, recently has felt " chunky " in my hands. I have other J's with less chunky feeling necks, but I have no idea what the radius is on them, as I'm assuming the '95 has a 9.5. or so I have read. Is there an easy way to measure the radius of a neck, with simple tools? Would love to know about the other necks.
Something like this could work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jnewmark
My hands must be changing or something. For years I have been playing a '95 J that, recently has felt " chunky " in my hands. I have other J's with less chunky feeling necks, but I have no idea what the radius is on them, as I'm assuming the '95 has a 9.5. or so I have read. Is there an easy way to measure the radius of a neck, with simple tools? Would love to know about the other necks.

This printout can help you figure it out:
http://pickguardian.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Pickguardian-Neck-Radius-Gauges.pdf
 
I have 3 Jazz basses. All Fender.
Player series with the modern c neck and 9.5 radius
Vintera 60s with 60s c neck and 7.25 radius
Aerodyne with the slim c and 12 radius
While I prefer the vinteras neck of the three, I mainly consider myself a P guy and that has the thickest neck so that's the only reason. Otherwise I have no issue switching between them. Personally I feel that the finish on the back of the neck be it gloss or satin has a bigger impact to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: trseal and jnewmark
Anyone know (or can speculate) why Fender Japan would have changed the radius so drastically…7.25” to 12”?
Customer feedback??? Marketing?
There’s just not many basses with flat 12” boards…you would have expected 9.5” as a logical change, if they felt a change was even needed, not 12”.
 
My speculation is that it's just current trend. Theirs been a lot of new guitar and bass players over the last decade or so. Especially with the pandemic we all know sales skyrocketed. Many modern instruments have the slimmer/thinner necks many would consider to be faster to play. I'd be willing to bet atleast 7/10 people who have never picked up an instrument before would prefer a 12 over 7.25. Again this is just my speculation based on current trends among the music scene.
 
  • Like
Reactions: trseal
Anyone know (or can speculate) why Fender Japan would have changed the radius so drastically…7.25” to 12”?
Customer feedback??? Marketing?
There’s just not many basses with flat 12” boards…you would have expected 9.5” as a logical change, if they felt a change was even needed, not 12”.
My educated guess is it's because FMIC, aka "Fender-America", took over the Japanese market when they dissolved their joint-venture with Kanda-Shokai back in 2015. For the longest time, Kanda-Shokai has kept the curvier, vintage-style necks as their go-to standard. Meanwhile, FMIC has started deprecating their 9.5" radius necks in favor of flatter 12" radii. A great example of this move is the revived Boxer Series. They originated in 1980's Japan and had necks with either 7.25" or 9.5" radii. Now, they're 12".

So, it comes as no surprise the home office is applying (inflicting, perhaps?) their "modern sensibilities" to the current crop of Japanese-made instruments. Whether it's chasing the trend or not, I cannot say. They never let me in to their meetings. :blackeye:
 
  • Like
Reactions: JumboJett35
Anyone know (or can speculate) why Fender Japan would have changed the radius so drastically…7.25” to 12”?
Customer feedback??? Marketing?
There’s just not many basses with flat 12” boards…you would have expected 9.5” as a logical change, if they felt a change was even needed, not 12”.

Since I'm privy to exactly zero inside information, I'm "answering" your question with a question. Could it be that the Aerodynes are 12" radius because the Player Plus series was 12" radius?
 
That could be but more likely, as mentioned, sales on Aerodyne basses (with original specs) may have tapered off so they made some changes (called them “Special”) and reintroduced it as a new model. But judging from the $599 blowout prices offered recently, I wonder if sales were not as expected.
 
  • Like
Reactions: aarono2690
Everyone's Aerodyne J Bass has been light correct? I ultimately think I'm going to get that Choco Burst J Bass.

I need to place an order on some gear and I figured it's time I get a high quality strap for my bass/heavier guitars. I currently use a 2" Dunlop mesh strap which leads to some shoulder fatigue after standing and playing for a while when I'm on my LP or using my MIM Standard Jazz. I'm a smaller guy so 4.5" wide straps feel like I'd be drowning. I was thinking about going with this.

Levy's PM32CH-BRN 3" Wide Garment Leather Guitar Strap - Brown Sweetwater Exclusive
 
I have some labella nickel rounds (the Chicago music exchange collab strings) I’m going to pop on the jazz bass today. Not sure if I want to commit my aerodyne P to using flats or not. I don’t have a need for vintage flat sound and quite dislike chromes, so I was thinking of throwing the green silk fender flats on to see if I can retain some grit.

I love Fender flats but they do settle into a darker, warmer vintage sound. Where I use them, I'm looking for that. I put Roto flats on another Jazz w/PV '74's on it and they have a nice "spank" to them for flats without the brightness of rounds.

Tim
 
Everyone's Aerodyne J Bass has been light correct? I ultimately think I'm going to get that Choco Burst J Bass.

I need to place an order on some gear and I figured it's time I get a high quality strap for my bass/heavier guitars. I currently use a 2" Dunlop mesh strap which leads to some shoulder fatigue after standing and playing for a while when I'm on my LP or using my MIM Standard Jazz. I'm a smaller guy so 4.5" wide straps feel like I'd be drowning. I was thinking about going with this.

Levy's PM32CH-BRN 3" Wide Garment Leather Guitar Strap - Brown Sweetwater Exclusive
EDIT: I ended up going with a different strap. Details are on the next page.

Not a bad price. I've been thinking of getting one of these direct from the manufacturer. Currently, they're on-sale for $40.
guitar-strap-1_2048x.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: aarono2690
Well boys, the Grey Aerodyne J and White Precision are both back in stock. I think I found a buyer for my MIM Jazz Bass. I have a decision to make...

1) If I'm only going to have one bass (for now), then it's probably wiser to go Jazz over Precision I assume. As it's been said P is a one trick pony, but does it well. I've seen a couple of you mention though that the Aerodyne P doesn't have the classic P sound. I'm too ignorant to know if that's true. I will say having the P bass for 4-5 days made me appreciate having the two pickup layout of the Jazz for anchoring.

2) I currently have a Grey Tele and a Chocolate Burst Strat is coming on Wednesday. Do I match the Grey Tele with a Grey J, the Chocolate SSS with a Chocolate SSS, or get nasty with a White P? I will say someone in this thread did a photoshoot with their Dolphin Jazz and man it looked very sharp.

I apologize asking so many questions, but I don't want to make any beginner errors and you guys have good insights.
 
Last edited:
Well boys, the Grey Aerodyne J and White Precision are both back in stock. I have a decision to make...

1) If I'm only going to have one bass (for now), then it's probably wiser to go Jazz over Precision I assume.

2) I currently have a Grey Tele and a Chocolate Burst Strat is coming on Wednesday. Do I match the Grey Tele with a Grey J, the Chocolate SSS with a Chocolate SSS, or get nasty with a White P? I will say someone in this thread did a photoshoot with their Dolphin Jazz and man it looked very sharp.

I apologize asking so many questions, but I don't want to make any beginner errors and you guys have good insights.
It depends. Does this kind of match-up tickle your fancy? (True, these are Satin Pewter Metallic, not Dolphin Grey, but I'd say it lands in that visual tone/groove.)

BE8hlth.jpg

9EOho5e.jpg