Recently I managed to borrow these two babies from a local store to test them for a couple of days before I choose which one to keep. These two models even though they look alike they have significant differencies in my opinion.
The 50s model (to the right of the picture with the maple fretboard) carries a pure vintage 58 pickup, which offers a more metallic (kind of aggresive) sound with more high-end, while the C type neck is considerably thicker than its counterpart. The body has a 2 tone sunburst which is quite brighter than the 60s model and the combination maple/anodized pickguard is killer for me.
The 60s model (to the left) has the perfect mellow P-bass sound that you can listen in so many classic records (from Motown to blues to rock...) because of its pure vintage 63 pup. The neck in this one feels slimmer (they call it 1963-C) and allows a more fluent playing (for me). Aesthetically it cannot be more classic, with a kind of red-ish 3 tone sunburst, tortoise pickguard and rosewood fretboard. I think there are a few less significant differencies which I will not refer here.
My dilemma starts because I like the appearnce of the 50s (with the anodized pickguard+maple= <3), but soundwise I am all in for the 60s. Big problem! I dont say that I dont like the 50s' model sound, but when I have the p-bass sound in mind is the 60s.
To conclude, I would really like to keep the 50s model (appearence wins), but without losing my favourite sound (60s). Does anyone of you believes that if I keep the 50s model with the maple fretboard and change the pickup from the stock pure vintage 58 to the pure vintage 63, the sound will be similar to the 60s model? Or you believe that the metallic/brighter sound in the 50s comes mainly from the maple wood in the fretboard?
Please hit me with question if you have any!
Also you can comment on which one you would keep in my position..
PS: both is not an option!!
The 50s model (to the right of the picture with the maple fretboard) carries a pure vintage 58 pickup, which offers a more metallic (kind of aggresive) sound with more high-end, while the C type neck is considerably thicker than its counterpart. The body has a 2 tone sunburst which is quite brighter than the 60s model and the combination maple/anodized pickguard is killer for me.
The 60s model (to the left) has the perfect mellow P-bass sound that you can listen in so many classic records (from Motown to blues to rock...) because of its pure vintage 63 pup. The neck in this one feels slimmer (they call it 1963-C) and allows a more fluent playing (for me). Aesthetically it cannot be more classic, with a kind of red-ish 3 tone sunburst, tortoise pickguard and rosewood fretboard. I think there are a few less significant differencies which I will not refer here.
My dilemma starts because I like the appearnce of the 50s (with the anodized pickguard+maple= <3), but soundwise I am all in for the 60s. Big problem! I dont say that I dont like the 50s' model sound, but when I have the p-bass sound in mind is the 60s.
To conclude, I would really like to keep the 50s model (appearence wins), but without losing my favourite sound (60s). Does anyone of you believes that if I keep the 50s model with the maple fretboard and change the pickup from the stock pure vintage 58 to the pure vintage 63, the sound will be similar to the 60s model? Or you believe that the metallic/brighter sound in the 50s comes mainly from the maple wood in the fretboard?
Please hit me with question if you have any!
Also you can comment on which one you would keep in my position..
PS: both is not an option!!