TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
You are correct that big companies can become hobbled by their success when technologies rapidly change and obsolescence occurs. I don't see that's the case with Fender because we don't have major technologies taking stringed instruments out of the market like digital did with film, but it's a well-known phenomenon where market leaders can take their success for granted and remain in denial about the impact these sorts of game-changing innovation will ultimately have.Big companies are not immune to stupidity. Have yall heard of Kodak? They were big in the 90's.... has anyone seen them lately? They sat too far behind the technology curve and got phased out.
The fact that YOU don't like/want does not mean much. Contrary to what is thought/written on this thread about fanned fretboard basses, there's a lot of interest and players actually purchasing/drooling over/seriously considering buying one. Otherwise we should consider the whole Dingwall company a bunch of crazy guys. And all the options offered by Ibanez simply an absurd, no gain, losers move, see my point?Why should they ? I love my P-basses as they are c’mon .. say what you want but I don’t need any fanned frets board, I rather need to improve my musical hear and skills
The fact that YOU don't like/want does not mean much. Contrary to what is thought/written on this thread about fanned fretboard basses, there's a lot of interest and players actually purchasing/drooling over/seriously considering buying one. Otherwise we should consider the whole Dingwall company a bunch of crazy guys. And all the options offered by Ibanez simply an absurd, no gain, losers move, see my point?
@Lownote38 I see and agree, obviously. But since Fender is a major player (the biggest?) in the basses/guitars business, it would not be... science fiction, imagining that they would decide one day to include a series of fanned frets basses. And I don't buy the supposed "difficulties" in tooling a production line for that: if Sheldon did it, they can actually do it as well. But, back to the topic, I only wanted to check what fellow bassplayers think about Fender ever doing the fanned fretboard move.![]()
Fender 5 string=1965 (Invented)
Ibanez Rb885 5 string=1986
Seems other are playing catch-up
and innovating on fenders design.
If it aint broke don't fix it!
Fenders first fretless was 69-70
I think if fanned frets really grabs a hold of the market, Fender will jump on and produce a bass with that. Their first example will be a total mess, though (like the spoke wheel truss rod adjustment they tried on the Elite basses not long ago). My point is that they'll do it when the market dictates that they have to.
Come on: be fair!!!Fender is far too traditional to do something like that. I'm not even sure they know how multiscale works![]()
Nah Fender INVENTED 5 string.Fender five string had NOTHING in common with a standard fiver. Same notes range than a 4 just displaced on five strings. Aborted soon. Definitely not an innovation, to me.
Understand the concrete possibility. But... will they dare to push that far as fanned fretted board on a Fender?
Nah Fender INVENTED 5 string.
Bill Wyman he converted a cheap Japanese bass to fretless as early as 1961 and used it with his first band, the Cliftons. The first commercially available fretless was Ampegs AUB-1 in 1966![]()
Right 100%!!! But "Their first example will be a total mess" who knows, really? They live in today's world and they are capable of building good to excellent basses, even at a very low price point. They might surprise the whole bass world!!!![]()
They'll do what they think will sell in the market.
IMO for most bass players, a fanned fretboard is the answer to a question they have never asked. I know that I have never asked that question since I started playing electric bass in 1967.