TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I have a Japanese version with active electronics. I had to shield the cavities and regrounded the bridge because of HUM, also added a KickAss bridge. It’s a nice playing bass once I got it dialed in. Jazz profile Neck is nice.
The bass had been sitting for a long time and I always do a fresh string change setup and put a high mass bridge on any fender I buy that doesn’t already have one, the bent metal bridge is garbage IMO. The shielding paint in these (Active Japanese not MIM) are a joke and these will make all kinds of grounding noises unless you shield them.Thanks for the reply. Was the original setup quite bad?
I tested a new Player jag, very nice bass. Anything with Precision pickups and a Jazz neck catches my eye. I like the simplicity of the Player jag; I much prefer that to all the switches on a typical jag
The one I looked at was Tidepool, very sharp color. I played it when I was looking for a P, didn’t pay too much attention to the balance; but I remember it felt and sounded great, I played it for quite a while, couldn’t put it down!I agree with you, alanloomis1980, regarding the simplicity of the controls on the Player Jags.
I don't need another bass (Ha!) but about a month ago, I went to Sam Ash in Manhattan to see what they had, and the first bass that I took off the wall was a Player Jag in Sonic Red, which is supposed to be a close-out color.
I like the P pickup, and the J, but what I really liked about it was how nicely the two pickups blended together; the P pickup didn't overpower the J. Add in a Jazz width neck, and it was very tempting.
Then, I played a Vintera 50s P-bass.
What a difference in tone. Deeper and mellower.
But the Player Jag is a very nice instrument.
Mike