You're just going to have to try it and see for yourself if it meets your needs or not.Have I got anything in my thought process completely wrong? I think the 100 may actually be exactly what I want.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
You're just going to have to try it and see for yourself if it meets your needs or not.Have I got anything in my thought process completely wrong? I think the 100 may actually be exactly what I want.
Ok, I preface this by saying I may be a bit ahead of myself and it may be a while before I buy (or can buy).
But my family crest has Paratus Semper on it.... So I like to do a bit of study before I buy.
Anyway met a bloke at a conference last weekend that plays guitar, turns out he is only about 1/2 hour from home. So he suggested we jam a bit and maybe try to get out to small venues when we are ready. He has a drum machine as well. I'm guessing my old R15 will be ok for the early days of practise but will likely prove to be too small if and when we progress.
My original plan was to get a V3 R40 for small acoustic shows and keep an eye open for a used V3 Rumble 200 or (been recommended to me - GK MB200) that someone wants to move on because they really want 500w... That doesnt seem to be happening much lol. With the Rumble 200, either combo or head, and in both brands of heads look for a Rumble 210 cab to go with it. Let me stress - this is a long term little piece by little piece strategy. I had been confused of the purpose of the 100.
But - I've now seen a secondhand but still boxed V3 Rumble 100 combo for sale, and my mind is ticking over. It's not that much more than the 40 brand new, and not that much less powerful than the 200 without a 2nd cab. It also has the XLR out (DI?). I have a DI box but I have no idea about it,I picked it up with a bunch of bits n pieces I was given by a bloke downsizing - I'll research that bit elsewhere.
I'm coming to the conclusion that the 100 may do all, or more, than I currently need and with the DI box and/or the XLR output on the combo I'm covered for venues that have their own PA. I am seriously considering jumping on this opportunity, or if I miss out on this one get a new 100 a little down the track when I need (rather than want) the new amp. Probably on the rent/buy scheme.
Have I got anything in my thought process completely wrong? I think the 100 may actually be exactly what I want.
I've an R40 and an R500 w/410, and had the R200 combo before "upgrading" to the head/410 rig. Don't think I've played through the R100, but have an idea how it should sound based on the other three. Even the R40 gets pretty loud.Have I got anything in my thought process completely wrong? I think the 100 may actually be exactly what I want.
OK, so I am now the slightly bemused owner of a Rumble 25 v3 practice amp.
My 14 year old son is wanting to take up bass, and I've been looking for the best bang for your buck in something small and light that sounds decent in a small space. He road trips a lot, and loading him down with anything bigger than a 1x8 seems silly. After hemming and hawing for a while, I decided to see what the Rumble 25 actually sounded like in a bedroom/music room space. I figured if it was good enough, I would hand it over to the kiddo along with whatever bass he end up with. If it was horrid, back to the store it would go.
Um... wow. I've been using an ancient Fender Sidekick 70 for a practice amp for years, and the little rumble 25 just kills it in terms of clarity at the low end. I wasn't expecting a combo that small to handle the low B well at all, but somehow it manages with grace, and I love the vintage tone on this little guy as well.
End of story, I'll be retiring my old Sidekick 70 and replacing it with the Rumble 25 for practice. Definitely not what I expected![]()
You are member #520 


Welcome to the Fender Rumble Club, EclecticLady!You are member #520
We hope you enjoy and your son is welcome any time.
Rumbles Rock!
![]()
Yeah I agree with that, I have that button down a lot playing on my P. When I first got my J, I played for a while not realising it was on the vintage setting. I thought to myself "this is not the tone I wanted or expected from a J" then I realised the vintage setting was on. Was very relieved when I played it with no settings and the eq all at 12.
I have a Jazz with 2 115 cabs. I am running the EQ flat and just pumping the buttons for different sounds. I like it best with vintage, contour and OD all on with OD set at 9/10 o clock. Sounds great to me.
Absolutely! Welcome to the Fender Rumble Club, himluis1!just got my 100w v3 rumble last thursday ... former bg250 112 owner ... love the rumble tone , weight , portability and so far so good ... can i get a number please ? View attachment 711139
You are member #521
MDF. The Rumble 25 is made of denser & heavier MDF. The Rumble 40 of lightweight plywood.I don't know if it has been mentioned before, but I just noticed that the Rumble 25 weighs three pounds more than the Rumble 40. I wonder why. I would suspect the speaker choice for the 25. Not that the weight is an issue; just an observation. And don't ask me why I'd be looking at yet another Rumble.......![]()
Maybe we forgot to tell you it is loud.OK---did it. It was awesome. I lived out a long held dream--to play bass as the main instrument in a band. The venue wasn't large like I thought. It was medium sized but packed. No DI needed. In fact the soundman came up to the stage and said I was too loud for his FOH to please turn down. LOL. On the stage it sounded balanced but a few feet past the stage it dominated the house. WOW! Of course I turned it down as I wanted it to sound right! The soundman gave me the thumbs up after I turned down to 10 o'clock with the bass turned to about 1 or 2. The thing is a blowtorch.
So now you need to buy another for the kid.OK, so I am now the slightly bemused owner of a Rumble 25 v3 practice amp.
My 14 year old son is wanting to take up bass, and I've been looking for the best bang for your buck in something small and light that sounds decent in a small space. He road trips a lot, and loading him down with anything bigger than a 1x8 seems silly. After hemming and hawing for a while, I decided to see what the Rumble 25 actually sounded like in a bedroom/music room space. I figured if it was good enough, I would hand it over to the kiddo along with whatever bass he end up with. If it was horrid, back to the store it would go.
Um... wow. I've been using an ancient Fender Sidekick 70 for a practice amp for years, and the little rumble 25 just kills it in terms of clarity at the low end. I wasn't expecting a combo that small to handle the low B well at all, but somehow it manages with grace, and I love the vintage tone on this little guy as well.
End of story, I'll be retiring my old Sidekick 70 and replacing it with the Rumble 25 for practice. Definitely not what I expected![]()
So now you need to buy another for the kid.
I also use a 25 for practice and have used it for Acoustic gigs as well.
I've never tried this, so I may be way off. It's probably not going to work as you wish.Greetings. I've got a scenario where I'll be playing with a group with a very basic mixer. 4 xlr with 2 1/4 inputs. I tend to do the talking between songs but we're in a transition with gear. I would get 1 xlr input.
Could I run a mic to an XLR to 3.5 adapter and put it in the AUX in of my rumble 500... Sending both my instrument and AUX input from Rumble v3 500 to the board? I've practiced using the Aux 3.5 for playing recordings. I'm not so concerned with quality for now, I'm not singing much backup with these guys. I just want to speak, and have it sent through via xlr out on the Rumble. I'm basically concerned about whether both inputs will be fed through the XLR out to the board.
I realize I could just use that line for the mic and not mix the v3 500.... Just seeing if I can do both.
Thanks.
^^^ This Is True! ^^^ Anything you input through the AuxIn is 'wide open' direct to the power amp. Be Careful!Said another way, the "Master" control is on the pre-amp side, and would control the volume of the instrument, but would not control the AuxIn level.
Thanks WRM. That makes sense. I guess it only costs 10 bucks for the adapter to try it. I haven't had a reason to go past noon on the gain and about 10 pm on the master. I'll give it a shot and report back after practice.I've never tried this, so I may be way off. It's probably not going to work as you wish.
From the wiring diagram, the AuxIn is added after the pre-amp signal, so both instrument (post pre-amp) and AuxIn should go out to the XLR/power amp. However, the AuxIn feeds straight in to the power amp/XLR, so volume of this signal must be controlled at the source. That means that the Mic might be way too loud, if there is no way to control that signal before sending it into the amp via AuxIn. Said another way, the "Master" control is on the pre-amp side, and would control the volume of the instrument, but would not control the AuxIn level.
Cheers,