Cool!
So, if ever needed, I could simply add another cab to the head without issue?
I'm going to be a dummy here - please bear with me - 8+8=4?
He probably teaches common core math at the high school... BWAHAHAHAHA
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Cool!
So, if ever needed, I could simply add another cab to the head without issue?
I'm going to be a dummy here - please bear with me - 8+8=4?
Correctomundo! Yes any two 8 ohm cabinets run in parallel present a total nominal load of 4 ohms to the amplifier. It is important not to go below 4 ohms.Cool!
So, if ever needed, I could simply add another cab to the head without issue?
I'm going to be a dummy here - please bear with me - 8+8=4?
Yes that is true, but just any other cabinet may not match up well and sound good with the Rumble 115 even though the head won't care. 4 ohms is 4 ohms.So in theory, any 8 ohm cab (other brand?) would run okay through the 500 head, alongside the 115?
WOOT!

1/8 + 1/8 = 1/4. That's how you combine parallel resistances.Cool!
So, if ever needed, I could simply add another cab to the head without issue?
I'm going to be a dummy here - please bear with me - 8+8=4?
Got my new (to me) rumble 500 head today!
Now the quest begins!
I think a 210 is how I'm going to go.
I need to (well, should) sell my 350 combo first.
1st choice is obviously a rumble cab, But I'm going to keep an eye on the classifieds to see if something interesting comes up in the meantime.
Congrats !
Digging mine so far.
I personally love, love, love the TC K series cabs they've recently released. I love my K210s and they're only $399 a pop.
Secretsound5Finally made the switch! The old one on top just kept shutting down. tried out the new Rumble V3 500 and fell in love again.
Secretsound5
How did you make the ears to rack the 500 - you are my hero!!!!!!
LennyJ

No really.I've spent over an hour looking at threads on the forums and the consensus seems to be that 16 AWG is fine for anything 10 foot or less.
Seems that the length is more important than wattage.
That's great info, thanks Linnin.
I'm hoping the one cab is enough. Worst case, add a 112. Very small, could go as my front seat passenger!
I've gigged the 500 combo solo many times, and never gone above a 1/4 in volume. Can't wait to try my first ever head.
Thanks to all in the club, I'm always keeping it Rumble!
That's best anyway. When you combine two different cabs with two different configurations of speakers, unless they're specifically made to work with each other, you often have issues with not all of them being the same efficiency. I just think it's easier not to have to think about it. Get the same thing 2x.After much consideration about whether to go for a 115 or 210... I went with the 210. Ordered today, comes Monday. I really liked the idea of the 115 but the symmetrical-ness of having 2 x 210 made me go that way. Looking forward to this!
Pics to follow of course![]()
It's not surprising at all. The 115 configuration has more speaker area and volume than a 210 configuration does, and the 15" driver is quite a bit more efficient than the 10" driver, even with two of them effectively doubling their efficiency.Quick update...got the 500 head today, gave it a quick run with the 115 cab earlier.
All I can say is - wow! It's a monster. When I A/B'd it against the 500 cab, it sounds very different indeed....loads more presence, bottom, and a real vintage crunch - loads od power.
It made the 500 combo sound quite tame in comparison!
We're gig-free this weekend, but have one next week, and two the week after - so it'll be getting some serious stick.
Early days, but just from a home demo, I can't see me needing an extra cab for what we do. I tried identical EQ'ing with both head and combo, and the 115 seemed more powerful. Maybe it's me imagining it!
Pics will follow over the weekend.