Lol! You got nothing. No picture, no profile... Nothing but Wikipedia which shot your argument to hell, but I like you. I like g-dud.My Google Fu is strong.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Lol! You got nothing. No picture, no profile... Nothing but Wikipedia which shot your argument to hell, but I like you. I like g-dud.My Google Fu is strong.
Lose the gold hardware (chrome preferred) and replace the abalone (?) dots with simple white dots, then I may consider one.
Nah, we're all good.Since g-dude and SJan3 will be busy for a while, I will venture to say the p bass is the trumpet of string instruments.
Lol! You got nothing. No picture, no profile... Nothing but Wikipedia which shot your argument to hell, but I like you. I like g-dud.
Oh, I see. Since the 17th century the pattern for violins has been established. It only took Leo about 4 years to establish the current P Bass.
Nah, we're all good.
Oh, I see. Since the 17th century the pattern for violins has been established. It only took Leo about 4 years to establish the current P Bass.
Sure. Little tweaks just like fender but the appearance and function remains unscathed.No, the violin continued to evolve - go back and re-read. There have been 20th century developments as well.
Not bad for an instrument where most of the body of work for it spans hundreds of years.
Again, tweaks to improve the format. This is hundreds of years ago. You're spitting in the wind, g.Oh, since you're probably not in the other thread, take a gander. As you can see, continued evolution.
Modernization around 1800
The upheavals that followed the French Revolution also had far-reaching repercussions in the world of music. The responsibility for organizing and financing musical events shifted from the aristocracy to the bourgeoisie and concerts became a regular feature of society life. Since these were held in ever larger halls, louder instruments with thicker bows were required. Violin makers were therefore forced to make those alterations to the instrument which resulted in the development of the modern violin at the turn of the 19th century; old instruments were "modernized" to meet the new requirements: the bridge was raised to increase string tension and thereby the volume. This also altered the angle of the strings to the fingerboard, so that the musician would have had to apply more pressure to play the high notes. This difficulty was counteracted by placing the neck at a backward angle, thus maintaining equal distance between strings and fingerboard along its length. At the same time both the neck and the fingerboard were lengthened. To cope with the increased pressure of the strings on the table the bass bar and sound post were also reinforced.
The strings were made stronger too, so that they could withstand the increased tension. It had long been customary to cover the G strings, which had a gut core, with metal. Nowadays the G string is often silver-wound. It is not completely clear whether the D and A strings were also covered in the 19th century; today aluminum-wound gut strings are generally used. The E string was also made of gut in the 19th century and was not replaced by a steel one until the 20th century. Nylon and steel strings are currently in use.
The modern bow was developed within the space of a few decades, the French bow maker François Tourte (1747–1835) playing a leading role: the bow became longer and stronger; its weight was changed, the center of gravity moved and the tension increased, which made more powerful strokes possible, such as martelé (hammered, short powerful strokes).
In around 1820 the German composer and violin virtuoso Louis Spohr (1784–1859) invented the chin-rest, which facilitated the sliding movement of the left hand.
Again, tweaks to improve the format. This is hundreds of years ago. You're spitting in the wind, g.
Anyone else notice Fender's lack luster efforts to come up with new designs? The "new" models are just P and J re-treads or re-configurations. When's the last time they introduced a new through
Anyone else notice Fender's lack luster efforts to come up with new designs? The "new" models are just P and J re-treads or re-configurations. When's the last time they introduced a new through neck model?
And let's not forget, they're both regarded as apex predators in their respective environments with no natural predators, especially when you exclude humans and orcas.God's most perfect creatures e.g. sharks and alligators have had no need to change in millennia - so goes the Fender Precision Bass.
And let's not forget, they're both regarded as apex predators in their respective environments with no natural predators, especially when you exclude humans and orcas.